Paper IV

A Vision Of The Future

Student: Asier Escrivà Gonzàlez (aesgon@alumnii.uv.es)

Suject: English Theatre From The XIX & XX Centuries

Teacher: Vicente Forés

Course: Filología Inglesa I

Date: January – 12th – 2006

What is the art? Can anybody explain exactly the term “art”? Sure that many people think that is possible to answer this question, but the truth is that everyone of us has one singular definition for that term: from my point of view, the art is the only quality human have for ourselves and it is the only thing that distinguishes us from the rest of animals, -the art is the quality we have to express our feelings and emotions-; we consider that music is art as the same we consider the drawing, cinema, literature or theatre, etc. The difference between them is that all these are different forms of ilustrating the art.

Theatre is always present in people: everybody have their own role, and they are needed to interpret it in an infinite scenario, that is our world; this is a subjective view of theatre. However, we are going to talk about the formal view of theatre, this is the theatre we know.

From my point of view, theatre is one art that has been reduced by the pass of time to an alternative way of entertainment (this is only in general, for the great part of people), but the problem we have today is that there are another (most common) ways of entertainment, this is the case, for example, of cinema. However, it is stupid to think that theatre is going to be subordinated to the rest of arts: theatre is evolving, theatre is joining new tendencies.

Recently, I saw a film that explained approximately my idea of a vision of future of the theatre, this was the spanish film “Noviembre”. This film is about a revolutionary group of young actors, called “Noviembre”, that decide to challenge the classical view of theatre making a sort of vanguardistic plays outside the scenarios, in the street, and making them always free, without earning money, so the result will be very negative because the extremism of some members of the group (it shows metaphorically the differences between the spanish progressive parties). The only fact I am not agree is that extremism. The original idea of making a new theatre outside, more popular, and the illusion of making their own art without the idea of being profited with it.

This is what I think it might be the theatre in the future, but I prefer to go deeply into this idea: our education since we are child does not prepare us to develop our artistic features, if we want to create a new generation with people who had a minimum artistic culture we need to give importance to it with the education, this is the most important thing we have to do: education is the first step. From the other hand, modern theatre does not have to follow the model of “Noviembre” like a realistic model, it is only an utopic vision, and this is because “Noviembre” rejects classical theatre, and I think that to be real innovative you need to combine classical ideas with the last tendences, for me it is easy to see it with the music (I am a musician): Mike Olfield is a musician who has never rejected the classical tendence of the classical authors and he has combined them with his ideas, so he is now one of the best musical innovators of this century.

Theatre will evolve with the rest of the arts, theatre needs not only good and new actors influenced by good old actors, theatre needs too good spectators influenced by an evolved education. Are we going to be good actors and good spectators? Only time will tell!

Bibliography:

Spanish Film “Noviembre”

www.theatrehistory.com

www.uv.es/fores/teatrouvp.html

Modern Theatrical Tendences (Internet communication via Google)

Back