SEAMUS HEANEY
THE EARLY PURGES
I was six when I first saw kittens drown.
Dan Taggart pitched them, 'the scraggy wee shits',
Into a bucket; a frail metal sound,
Soft paws scraping like mad. But their tiny din
Was soon soused. They were slung on the snout
Of the pump and the water pumped in.
'Sure, isn't it better for them now?' Dan said.
Like wet gloves they bobbed and shone till he sluiced
Them out on the dunghill, glossy and dead.
Suddenly frightened, for days I sadly hung
Round the yard, watching the three sogged remains
Turn mealy and crisp as old summer dung
Until I forgot them. But the fear came back
When Dan trapped big rats, snared rabbits, shot crows
Or, with a sickening tug, pulled old hens' necks.
Still, living displaces false sentiments
And now, when shrill pups are prodded to drown
I just shrug, 'Bloody pups'. It makes sense:
'Prevention of cruelty' talk cuts ice in town
Where they consider death unnatural
But on well-run farms pests have to be kept down.
DIGGING
Under my window a clean rasping sound
Till his straining rump among the flowerbeds
The coarse boot nestled on the lug, the shaft
By God, the old man could handle a spade,
My grandfather could cut more turf in a day
The cold smell of potato mold, the squelch
and slap
Between my finger and my thumb
Between my finger and my thumb
The squat pen rests; as snug as a gun.
When the spade sinks into gravelly ground:
My father, digging. I look down
Bends low, comes up twenty years away
Stooping in rhythm through potato drills
Where he was digging.
Against the inside knee was levered firmly.
He rooted out tall tops, buried the bright edge deep
To scatter new potatoes that we picked
Loving their cool hardness in our hands.
Just like his old man.
Than any other man on Toner's bog.
Once I carried him milk in a bottle
Corked sloppily with paper. He straightened up
To drink it, then fell to right away
Nicking and slicing neatly, heaving sods
Over his shoulder, digging down and down
For the good turf. Digging.
Of soggy peat, the curt cuts of an edge
Through living roots awaken in my head.
But I've no spade to follow men like them.
The squat pen rests.
I'll dig with it.
They
were published from “Death of a Naturalist” (1966) <(URL:http://www.poemhunter.com/seamus-heaney/poems/poet-6714/page-1/)>
I
am going to analyse two poems of Seamus Heaney, “
The early Puges” and “Digging”. I
would try to comment some of his conflicts, problems etc because his nationality
(Irish). These problems or conflicts are represented in many of his works.
I have chose those poems because Seamus apart from his nationality problems
he reflects other important problems as his childhood or his family.
Seamus Heaney was born in April, 1939. He grew up as a country boy, in
the midst of a traditional, rural environment and family. His father’s
family was more traditional than his mother’s family, which was more connected
with the modern world than with the traditional rural one. This fact has
always influenced Heaney´s poetry,
within this mixture of the Gaelic past and the
Firstly
his poem “The early Purges” is divided in 7 triplets. The rhythm is regular.
Along this poem, Heaney reflects his obsession with life and death using
a metaphorical meaning. The author relates one experience he had when he
was 6 years old when his kittens drowned and “Dan Taggart” threw them on
the garbage telling him: “the scraggy wee shits are better now in the place
they are than before”. That event marked him, first because the scene was
so cruel, and then because he did not understand it. The author uses an
unreal name “Dan” to represent a character in the poem. In the last stanza
the author reflects another meaning that the poem has when the author compares
the urban life and the rural life, where the city people do not understand
that cruelty with animals that the rural people employ to prevent illness.
In my opinion, with this last stanza, the author is trying to explain the
hypocrisy of town people because what they do is exactly the same, not
only with animals, but with other people.
Secondly
his poem “Digging” deals about the confrontation between the rural traditional
hard-working life and the modern and artistic way of living he lives, I
have said before.Along the poem,
Heaney compares his vision of his pen between his fingers, as a vision
of poetry, as the vision of his father working.
This
poem is divided into 2 parts. Each part starts with a couplet and then
develops into an iambic structure. So the poem has a very regular structure.
The poet uses very descriptive verses to describe the figure of his father’s
work. The descriptions of the scene; sounds, rural elements, actions etc
create a strong visual image of what his father is doing exactly and what
he feels. After these descriptive verses, also the author points one of
his common topics along his poetry: the obsession with the past, where
the author also talks about his grandfather, as a representation of the
family pride. Heaney relates a past image with his grandfather, in which
he was carrying him milk and his grandfather drank it and looked at him
as he could smell the turf and the potatoes. All these very descriptive
images create in the author a sensible humour, specially dealing with the
fact that he could never be as them and he has to be “happy” just doing
what he knows to do (handling a pen and writing poetry). So, he can use
that ability to praise his family and the past.
Finally,
as we can observe Heaney is a poet who takes into account the familiar
relationships and his childhood in many senses. Also he expresses his feelings
and fears about
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The
Official Web Site of the Nobel Foundation, “Seamus Heaney”, NobelPrize,org,
Dr. Alf A. Lindberg,