ROSENCRANTZ AND
GUILDENSTERN
ARE DEAD
AUTHOR: Tom
Stoppard
TITLE: Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern Are Dead.
EDITORIAL: Samuel
French
DATE AND PLACE OF THE PUBLICATION:
DRAMATIS PERSONAE
In this
play we can see four main characters, and others that are secondary.
-
Rosencrantz: he is friend of Guildenstern. He wears a brown jacket, brown
shorts, brown long socks, a belt, white shirt and brown shoes. He is clumsy and
ridiculous.
-
Guildenstern: he is friend of Rosencrantz. He wears a blue jacket, blue shorts,
blue long socks, white shirt and blue shoes. He thinks a lot. He thinks about
life, the world, the death…
- Hamlet:
he is the character of Shakespeare, but in this play, he has a secondary paper.
He is the prince of
- The Player: he
belongs to a travelling group of actors. He talks with Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern a lot.
PLOT AND SUMMARY
Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern are in some place playing to “heads and tails”. They see the
travelling group of actors, who go to Hamlet’s castle to perform a play in it.
Then, they remember that they should go to that castle. When they arrive,
Claudius and Gertrude explain to them what his work is: they must find the
reason for what Hamlet has a rare behaviour. For that, they change the play
that the actors are going to perform. But Hamlet kills Polonius. Because of it,
Hamlet is sent to
SPACE AND TIME
The space
in the play is different every scene. At first, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
are in some place (the author doesn’t set the place). But then, the actions
take place in different stages: in the castle, in a boat… These two are the
same that appear in Hamlet play of Shakespeare.
The time of
the play is old. The actions take place in olden ages, when there were castles
and Kings and
LITERARY RESOURCES
This play
is divided into three acts. In this play predominates long phrases and long
dialogues, which make the play boring and difficult. The author uses some plays
on words, and sometimes the author confuses the dialogues: for example in the
page 42-43, when the two main characters repeat the same several times, but
each time one says something and then the same character says something that
has been said by the other character… and then this character says something
different… These things make difficult to understand the play.
PERSONAL OPINION
In my
opinion, this play is boring, because the author complicates the play a lot
with the repetitions and the plays on words. But there are some interesting in
this play: first that it is a new version of a play written by Shakespeare; and
second that in this play there are reflections about the life, the death, the
world and the fortune. The author suggests some ideas about if the people are
bosses of their life, or if is the fortune which plans our life. I think that
it is the interesting part of the play, because for me, it is boring.