THE FEMALE VOICE IN THE VICTORIAN POETRY: REPRESENTATIONS OF WOMEN

 

 

In this paper I am going to analyse, in a general sense, the female voice in some Victorian works and the use of women as subjects in Victorian Art. Moreover, to carry out a good analysis and to understand the way women were treated in the Victorian period, I am going to introduce a general analysis of the role that women had in the Victorian poetry as voices, in some poetical works, and as writers. Firstly, I have mentioned the different representations that women have suffered as subjects in the Victorian Art. Secondly, I have exhibited the role women have displayed analysing five authors and some of their works, to understand that the female figure or her voice is often represented or repressed in a way that reduces her to a fixed meaning, or in a way that praise her rights. Finally, I want to end up explaining the paper that women have played in the society of the 19th century, the way they lived and the way they fought to improve their social and political situation.

 

To start with the enumeration of the different representations that women have suffered as subjects in the Victorian Time, I want to make clear that, generally, women have been represented in a lot of different ways. For that reason, the way we can enumerate the different representations of women is too vast and too subjective and I have decided to use the list that we can find in the Victorian web.

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

According to the Victorian web, the different representations of women can be grouped in five groups.

 The first group talks about the female power. It is where we can see women represented as goddesses, heroines, powerful monsters and the famous femme fatale. One example of a woman represented as a goddess is the painting by Dante Gabriel Rossetti called Astarte Syriaca (1), which is the representation of the Roman goddess Venus as a powerful, sensual woman. In other works, women are represented as heroines, playing the role of Diana, the Greek goddess, or Judith, the Biblical figure. In the representation of powerful monsters, the Victorian web emphasizes the representation of vampires, mermaids, sirens and harpies. I can stress, for example, the paintings of mermaids and sirens of the famous painter John William Waterhouse, and the paintings of Medusa (2), the Greek monster, which has been represented during time in all the periods, underlining the Classical Period and the Victorian Time. To end up with the representation of the female power, I have to dedicate some lines to the representation of the femme fatale. In the Pre-Raphaelite School, the powers of the femme fatale were promoted. Sometimes women were represented with supernatural powers, and in other works, especially in the late Victorian Art, the authors underlined the female sexuality and its power over men. The representation of the dangerous woman, as Cleopatra, Salomé and Delilah, was also typical in the Victorian Time. 

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

The second group deals with the representation of women as victims. The themes of women destroyed by love, by tragic lovers, is also typical of this period. The Pre-Raphaelites and most of the Victorians represented the woman as a victim of a tragic love, as a sexual frustration, or they represented a punishment of the female. One example is the lyric Marianna by Lord Tennyson, where the disconsolate heroine waits in vain for her lover (I will analyse this work later). Other subject is the representation of the fallen woman (women who had given in to seduction, living a life in sin). For example, in Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s painting Found (3) we can see a fallen woman who resist the man. A question that has been studied for several years and that is studied nowadays is if when we see a representation of a fallen woman, it is really the representation of a fallen woman or it is the representation of Ophelia, the Shakespeare’s female character of Hamlet. One example of that representation could be seen in the painting Ophelia (4) by the British artist Sir John Everett Millais. In addition, most Victorian authors have represented women as martyrs, women in chains or as slaves. Some examples are The Greek Slave (5) by Hiram Powers, Orpheus and Eurydice (6) by George Frederick Watts and St Eulalia (7) by John William Waterhouse. Moreover, women have been represented as victims of their own condition of female subjects, and as victims of her situation in society (without election, opportunities and aims in life).

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

The third group is called in the Victorian Web “Objects of Desire”. In that selection, the sleeping beauty myth has a lot of popularity. One example is the painting by Edward Burne-Jones Sleeping Beauty (8). Moreover, another theme which is repeated in a lot of cases is the representation of the Lady of Shalott (Lord Tennyson’s poem), as we can see in the painting by Arthur Hughes (9) with this name, the various by John William Waterhouse (10) or the own interpretation made by Dante Gabriel Rossetti (11) that was published in Tennyson’s Poems in 1857.

 

One thing that has surprised me is the horror of the nude. Normally, we see a lot of nudes portraits and pictures in other periods and cultures, but during the Victorian Period, the nudes are rather few than a lot. According to the Victorian Web, the horror of the nude did not come from a cult of chastity; it seemed to have been part of the enormous façade of the 19th century, with its code of respectability. They distinguish between two kinds of nudes: one due to the classical tradition when goddesses and heroes were represented nudes, and the second due to an exotic representation.

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

The fourth group is the representation of women as the Ideal. If we analysed Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s work, we can see that he had an Ideal of woman and it changed during his career. Firstly, the representation he made of women was a stereotype: a blond, slender, round-armed, straight-nosed, white-skinned… It could be seen in The Girlhood of Mary (12). Then, he moved beyond the unreachable saintly figure of Mary to convert the features of his sister to his favourite ideal type. But after that, he met Elisabeth Eleanor Siddall, in whom he met his Ideal. As a result, Rossetti’s Ideal took on different forms: sinful woman, with complete fantasies, victimized woman…in conclusion, the femme fatale. Otherwise, the role of a woman in her house, supporting her husband, was too current in the Victorian Time. It is showed in the painting I have mentioned before, The Girlhood of Mary, where we see the first Ideal woman of Rossetti and also a woman learning the task of embroidery (which can be the physical and the psychical ideal of that period, a woman looking for her husband, her house and her children).

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

The fifth group, and the last one, is called in the Victorian web “Miscellaneous”. In this group I have found the representations of women as servants, Governesses, workers and artists. In one hand, it is necessary for a woman to belong to a family with a high economical level to be an artist, and only the higher-class women had the education to be a Governess. On the other hand, needlework and teaching were seen as “natural” professions for women, and so would have been appropriate for those from the middle- and upper- classes. Furthermore, seamstress and dressmaker were employments for the women who had enough money to pay to learn the trade. And the women of lower classes had to work as servants or in a factory. These differentiations were introduced in the Victorian Art, too. In 1840s, the figure of a seamstress appeared in the work of Charles Kingsley Alton Locke and Cheap Clothes and Nasty. Similarly, a lot of works tried to fight to improve the labour situation, and to get better the situation of women in the labour field (for example, The Condition of the Working Class in England, by Friedrich Engels).

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

To sum up with the first part of my paper, I have to add a few lines about the Pre-Raphaelite women. The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood (also known as the Pre-Raphaelites) was a group of English painters, poets and critics, founded in 1848 by John Everett Millais, Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Holman Hunt. The group's intention was to reform art by rejecting what they considered to be the mechanistic approach first adopted by the Mannerist artists who succeeded Raphael and Michelangelo. They believed that the Classical poses and elegant compositions of Raphael in particular had been a corrupting influence on academic teaching of art.

 

 

"Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 8 Dec 2007, 18:52 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 7 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pre-Raphaelite_Brotherhood&oldid=176611969>  

 

 

The Pre-Raphaelite artists used women as their primary subject (as victims, old maids, prostitutes, etc.). These artists hated to see their ideal creatures so degraded and they raised them to the higher state they deserved. Some Pre-Raphaelite women were Elisabeth Eleanor Siddall (ideal woman of Dante Gabriel Rossetti), Georgia Burne-Jones, Jane Morris, etc.

 

 

“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

 

Starting with the second part of my paper, I must explain that I have tried to exhibit the role women have displayed analysing five authors and some of their works. First, I want to analyse the male authors and some of their works, to continue with the analysis of women authors and some of their main works. The male figures that are analysed in this part are Robert Browning, Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Lord Alfred Tennyson. To introduce the ideas of these authors, I have to emphasize that, in a general sense, the male speakers use their narrative voices to suppress the female point of view and to enforce the patriarchal domination, putting words in the female’s mouth, assigning a meaning to them or imposing their views on them. Due to that, women are reduced to a fixed meaning.

 

Talking about Robert Browning, I have selected two of his poems, called My Last Duchess and Porphyria’s Lover.

 

My Last Duchess is a great example of the dramatic monologue. It first appeared in 1842 in Browning’s Dramatic Lyrics. It is a 28 rhymed couplet, with iambic pentameter, and it tells us the story of a Duke who, presumably, killed his wife. The poem is preceded by the word Ferrara, which seems to indicate that the Duke of the poem is really the Duke of Ferrara, who married with Lucrezia de’ Medici, a fourteen years old young girl. The history says that Lucrezia died three years later in strange circumstances, probably poisoned by her husband, but there are not any clues. The poem is supposed to refer to that Duke, and the Duchess is supposed to be Lucrezia. Moreover, some critics have seen in the silent listener, the courier, the person of Nikolaus Mardruz, the real courier of the Duke when he was in charge of arranging his second marriage.

Analysing the poem, it start with the word “that’s”, which involves a conversational style: Browning treats to involve the readers in the situation, in order to understand it; the monologue the speaker is making to the silent listener is also a monologue for the readers. The first sentence put us in situation, because the speaker explains us that he is going to talk about his last wife pointing to a painting of her in the wall (“That’s my last duchess painted on the wall”). Then, the speaker explains us how the painting was made: he expresses that Fra Pandolf (a monk) made it. The sentence (“looking as if she were alive”) shows us that the Duchess is dead, and that the picture is put in the wall to contemplate her. Another important sentence in the beginning of the poem is when the Duke betrays himself as a selfish and jealous person (“strangers like you this pictured countenance,/that depth and passion of its earnest glance,/but to myself they turned since none puts by/ the curtain drawn for you”). In that point of the poem the reader understands that the Duke is a jealous person who seems to have murdered his wife because he is the only one who can contemplate her beauty. In that sense, the Duke explains that the painting only can be seen when he wants to and nobody has the power to display it, and there is not any need to say that thing because the painting stands on the house of the Duke and for that reason, he is the owner of it and nobody can enter without his consent. I understand that the Duke murdered his wife in an action of jealousy and once she is dead he has absolute control over her, he thought he should be the only person at whom she can smile directly, and she is an art object in the Duke’s collection of paintings and statues. Another sentence that has this meaning is when the Duke says (“much the same smile? This grew; I gave commands;/Then all smiles stopped together”). In my opinion, the Duke is saying that he gave commands to somebody to stop the smiles of his wife, so, to kill her as the solution of his jealousy. Afterwards, the Duke draws back the curtain and asks to the listener about his lord’s daughter, because the listener is a courier who is arranging for the Duke his second marriage, and in that point, he demonstrates his male chauvinism and egocentrism again when he calls the girl as his object (“at starting is my object”). Finally, the Duke hints his intentions by looking a second piece of art, a sculpture of Neptune (“Notice Neptune, though,/ taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity”).

 

Porphyria’s Lover is another example of dramatic monologue which appeared in 1836 as “Porphylia”. Then, it was republished in Dramatic Lyrics in 1842 under the name of “Madhouse Cells”, and it received its actual name in 1863. The poem describes a man who kills her beautiful lover because she loves him. It is a sixty-line poem consisting of one long stanza, written in a conversational style, but with a maintained rhyme (ABABB) and a strictly meter. The speaker, a man who is in a cottage, sees her lover, Porphyria, coming in out a storm and proceeding to make a fire. The girl takes off the wet clothes and calls her lover, but she does not receive any answer (lines 14-15 “she sat down by my side/ And call'd me./ When no voice replied/”). So, she makes herself comfortable with her lover and she starts to talk about the problems she had with her relationship and the social strictures that she has to suffer to be with him. She is defying her family to be with him, because she says she loves him a lot (lines 21-25“Murmuring how she loved me/she Too weak, for all her heart's endeavour,/ To set its struggling passion free/ From pride, and vainer ties dissever,/ And give herself to me for ever.”).  In that moment, the speaker is thinking the way they can stay together forever, the way to preserve the love moment, and he warps her hair around her neck and strangles her (lines 35-40: “While I debated what to do./That moment she was mine, mine, fair,/ Perfectly pure and good: I found/ A thing to do, and all her hair/ In one long yellow string I wound/ Three times her little throat around,/ And strangled her.”).  Then, the man states that she does not suffer, as if she wanted to die (lines 41-42: “No pain felt she;/ I am quite sure she felt no pain.”). After the murder, the man places the body with him and he stays all the night with it, as a symbol of love. Finally, he is sure that his acts have been good because God has not show any sign of disapproval (line 60: “And yet God has not said a word!”). The speaker of this poem has been criticised and analysed several times and there are different interpretations of the poem in that sense. My opinion is that the speaker is crazy by love, he wants to stay with his lover and for any reason, it is too difficult, and so he goes mad and thinks that the only manner they are going to stay together is in heaven. He is convinced that the action is correct, because he says she felt any pain and he justifies himself saying that God agrees with him. In a deeper level, the poem is expressing the union of violence and sex. Sex was something hidden in the Victorian Time, and Browning is expressing it as a natural thing. Moreover, it is confronted with violence, as a reaction in front of the Romantic love. For example, the poem is against the Romantic Movement in the sense that the moment the girl is killed is a Romantic moment (nature, countryside, rain, storm…), the poem is against the Romantic idealisation of love. Moreover, the moment she takes off her wet clothes is a sexual moment, and the total amount of these things (violence-sex) is a reaction in front of the society.

 

To conclude with these two poems, I must say that both poems describe a possessive speaker, a male chauvinist character who locates women in an inferior level. We do not hear the female voice in these poems, we suppose what the women think because the male speakers tell us it. The male’s objection of a female is taken to an extreme, and the result is fatal for the women. The male speaker possesses the female character as an object, and he strangles her in both cases because of the sense of domination over the woman. Robert Browning is, from my point of view, criticizing the idea of domination over women, he is illustrating that nobody can posses other person and anybody who tries to posses something that does not belong to him acts against it and destroys it, because the sense of superiority and domination is too difficult to control. The author is contradicting the idea of inferiority of women using a “part-real” story and an imaginary story in his poetry, so these poems depict the women as victims in a society that take them as inferiors.

 

The following author I want to stress is Dante Gabriel Rossetti and his works Jenny and The Blessed Damozel. 

 

Jenny is a long poem (400 lines) written in 1869 and published in 1870 in Poems. It narrates the thoughts of a young scholar when he is looking at Jenny, a young prostitute, who falls asleep in her room. The young scholar starts a dramatic monologue (where the speaker does not represent the poet and the statements are not what the poet believes) analysing his view of the young prostitute, in an attempt to explore the womanhood of the Victorian Time. The young scholar, the speaker, assumes to have a dissolute lifestyle (a careless life). He leaves his readings to enjoy the pleasure that a woman can offer to him. Jenny is supposed to be a high class prostitute because of the description of her room. Moreover, she is in her room because it is the safest place where she can stay, all is different outside the room. Otherwise, the poem separates the line between a man and a woman, a prostitute. The speaker has an active role, he controls the woman (for example, he reads her mind, as a book: line 158-162 “Why, as a volume seldom read/ Being opened halfway shuts again,/ So might the pages of her brain/ Be parted at such words, and thence/ Close back upon the dusty sense”). He attempts to discern her thoughts without talking to her. The woman has a passive role, she is like an object in a subordinate position (for example, her head is upon his knee, in a lower position in reference with the man). Jenny has no voice, there is silence for the scholar to think, and he is the one who can punish her, condemn her and forgive her, too. On the other hand, the speaker’s monologue stands for the fine line that separates the fallen woman and the “correct” lady. The speaker thinks about Jenny, her social position and her pure heart. Instead of sexual excess when she falls asleep, he begins to speculate about her past, her humanity. He expresses that she is not different from other women (line 178: “Just as another woman sleeps!”). The scholar compares Jenny with the women of Raphael and Michelangelo, normally Madonnas (the ideal woman), but with an added of sex and sin. In conclusion, the speaker makes a reflection about the role of the fallen women, of the prostitutes in society, in favour of the rights of these women, and against the “natural” thinking, where they are inferiors and sick persons. The speaker realises that Jenny is like another woman, a delicate person with a pure heart, and he admits that the blame is on the hands of men, because the prostitutes do not have any election and probably the circumstances force them to practise prostitution. He disputes about the role of the prostitutes in the Victorian society, asking if Jenny and the prostitutes are the bad influence for the society or if it is the society which influences badly these women. But all these things are taken out without any real condemnation, I mean, the younger knows that the society mentality is quiet different and that it is too difficult to change it.

 

The Blessed Damozel is a 151 lines poem first published in 1846, and it is a painting of the same author (1871). In that sense, we have a double approach, the text and the image. In the painting, the poet appears and he is visualising a dream of her blessed damozel in heaven, where we can see the clear difference between life and death (he is alive, because he is separate of heaven, and she is dead because she is in heaven). The poem, which I am going to analyse, presents a damozel (a poetic version of a damsel, a young unmarried lady) who is observing her lover from heaven. The two lovers are separated by the death of the damozel and she is praying God to enter to the paradise only with her lover and not alone. There are two narrative voices in the poem, which are the voices of the two characters, the damozel and the lover. She is described as a damsel, a young unmarried lady, with yellow hair, as a Madonna (ideal woman). It assumes the purity and the innocence she has (lines 7-12: “Her robe, ungirt from clasp to hem,/ No wrought flowers did adorn,/ But a white rose of Mary's gift/ On the neck meetly worn;/ And her hair, lying down her back,/ Was yellow like ripe corn”). Moreover, she loves him a lot although for her in heaven one day counts as ten years, and the way she looks at him is the same that it was when she was on earth, despite the fact that time passes on earth but not in heaven (lines 18-19: “her day/ Had counted as ten years”). On the other hand, her lover is thinking about her and he describes her voice like a birds’ song, and he says he can heard her voice. The young lady tries to justify that they should be together saying that they are two, two prayers with the same aim, and she tells us how the relations are between other lovers in heaven. Finally, we know she is at the outer gates of heaven because she accepts her situation and she understands that she must wait until his lover’s death (lines 140-141-142: “She gazed, and listen'd, and then said,/ Less sad of speech than mild,--/ 'All this is when he comes.'”; lines 148-149: “And then she cast her arms along/ The golden barriers”). The lovers admit their situation and at the end of the poem he declares she is crying, as he could heard her voice and her tears, as if he knows she is suffering due to his absence: (lines 150-151: “And laid her face between her hands,/ And wept. (I heard her tears.)”). In that poem, Dante Gabriel Rossetti expresses his Christian belief: she is in heaven with the angels, with Christ the Lord, with the Mother Mary and with Dove (the Holy Spirit), and their love must also be accepted by God. Consequently, and following what some critics have decided, the poem is considerate as an optimistic love poem, because the lovers stand for hope and they accept to pray for their reunion in heaven.

 

If we compare these two poems we can assure that both are presented from a male’s point of view. Jenny is related by a man, and we do not hear any feminine voice. The Blessed Damozel is recounted from the man’s view, too, because the lady only tells us what she sees in heaven and her requests to God. The women are a desire object and all their feelings are supposed by the man’s voice. Rossetti’s speaker imagines the woman saying what he wants to hear, although in the last poem we can hear a little of the female’s voice, but it is not enough to assert that the woman is a complete character and the main idea we have of her is by the male’s speech. Moreover, the love story of the second poem is a classical story, where the woman needs her lover even when she is dead, but I ask if it is the real life, because I think that it is not, even in that time (what can be called “idealize love story”). In addition, the author provides an unreal communication between the male and the female figure in both poems. In the first one, there is no real communication between them. Jenny is asleep and the only speaker is the man who assumes what the lady is thinking, and even though the speaker does not control the woman by putting words in her mouth, he imposes his views on her.  In the second poem, the young lady has her own voice but it is insufficient in comparison with the man’s voice, and he supposes things without any real prove (when he says he is hearing her tears, for example). As a conclusion, in spite of these assumptions, Rossetti’s work is not against the female figure. In Jenny, Rossetti is trying to dispute about the role of the prostitutes in the Victorian society, asking if Jenny and the prostitutes are the bad influence for the society or if it is the society which influences badly these women. In the second one, the author is representing an idealized love, where the woman is the most damaged figure but it is a God’s decision (because she is dead in the heaven). In my opinion, the two women of these poems represent women as victims due to they are victims of their own life: Jenny is a prostitute, so she is a victim of her social position (her job), and The Blessed Damozel represents the woman as a victim of a tragic love.

 

Now I have selected another author, Lord Alfred Tennyson, and two of his major works: Mariana and The Lady of Shalott.

 

Mariana is a poem of seven twelve-line stanzas that uses the iambic tetrameter and the rhyme ABAB CDCD EFEF. It was published in Poems, Chiefly Lyrical, in 1830. The poem talks about a lady who is isolated of the world. Tennyson describes the lady and her complicate mental condition using the landscape, her house: (“With blackest moss the flower-plots/ Were thickly crusted, one and all:/ The rusted nails fell from the knots/ That held the pear to the gable-wall”; lines 61-64: “All day within the dreamy house,/ The doors upon their hinges creak'd;/ The blue fly sung in the pane; the mouse/ Behind the mouldering wainscot shriek'd,/ Or from the crevice peer'd about”). The author describes an old house, too dreary, dark and sad, and that description can be used to describe the lady’s character. The author is addressing the issue of an individual and her lack of connection with society. She laments in all the stanzas that her life is dreary and her loneliness encourages her to wish her death: “She said, 'I am aweary, aweary,/ I would that I were dead!”, (according to the Victorian Web, it is a typical characteristic of the Victorian Time).  Moreover, she is depressed and the reader knows it, but I cannot give a correct interpretation of why she is depressed and what the meaning of the poem is. Probably she has lost her lover or she is waiting for a lover who never comes (as Shakespeare’s Mariana poem), and for that reason she is isolated from the world and that situation is killing her, and maybe Tennyson tries to show the situation of subordination that women suffered in that time and he encourages them to face their fear with that poem. Despite that interpretation, which is my own vision of the poem, the Wikipedia encyclopedia offers two interpretations of the poems, one that supports that the poem is an allegory of Tennyson’s early life, and the second that assumes that the poem is an allusion of Tennyson’s father mental illness.

 

 

"Mariana." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 9 Jan 2008, . Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 9 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariana&oldid=183146557

 

 

 

The lady of Shalott is a poem with two versions: one published in 1833, of twenty stanzas, and the other on 1842 of nineteen stanzas. The poem talks about a young lady who is trapped in a tower by a curse: she cannot go outside the tower, and what is worse, she cannot look outside the tower. She only has a mirror where she sees some things from the outside world: the river, the road, red cloaks, damsels and knights, etc. The young lady is weaving all the time but one day she notices the knight Lancelot and she falls in love with him. The young woman decides to face her fear and she looks outside to see Lancelot, and she abandons the tower. Luckily, she finds a boat in the river, where she writes her name, and she decides to go to Camelot. But the curse was real and she must die. At the end, Lancelot sees the lady dead in the boat. That poem exemplifies the tragic love; a woman forgoes everything for love.

 

An interesting thing which implies that poem is the visual repercussion it has. There are a lot of paintings that follow the topic of The Lady of Shalott, and it was one of the most important topics in the Victorian Time, mainly in the Pre-Raphaelite authors because of its eroticized medieval setting and tragic subject, popular themes in the Pre-Raphaelite art. According to Elisabeth Nelson, the Lady of Shalott inspired many Pre-Raphaelite artists because of its tragic subject and the treatment of the role of the artist. For the male artists, the lady is represented as an object of desire, depicting her as an idealized woman: pure, beautiful, mysterious, unattainable, embowered, spiritual and dedicated to her tasks. Some examples are the works of Sidney Harold Meteyard, William Holman Hunt and Dante Gabriel Rossetti. For the female artists, the lady is defined by her position, in relation to her surroundings and her situation of imprisonment, or in relation to her status in society. Some examples are the works of Elizabeth Sidall, Florence Rutland and Inez Warry. What is clear is that each author makes his own representation, for example, some of them paint the lady in the tower, in front of the mirror, others paint the lady in her boat, or her death, etc.

 

 

Erin Frauenhofer '09, English 151.  “Men vs women: illustrating “The Lady of Shalott””. Brown University, 2003. The Victorian Web. Inc. 3 Jan 2007 <http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/tennyson/frauenhofer.html>

 

Extracted from: Nelson, Elizabeth. "Tennyson and the Ladies of Shalott. " Ladies of Shalott: A Victorian Masterpiece and its Contexts. Providence: Brown University Department of Art, 1985.

 

 

Moreover, some critics, whom I agree with, have stated that that poem, as many other poems, shows the role of the Victorian women. The lady is inside her “home”, and she cannot look outside, the external world. It could be a parallelism of the women’s situation: their place is the house and they are not able to look further because they have not any possibility of changing the society, and any decision to take. The responsibility of the lady lies in her acceptance of her passive role in life, as the Victorian women, and her death is the consequence of being in the place reserved to men. William Holman Hunt, creator of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, assumes that “the poem epitomized the failure of a human soul towards its accepted responsibility… in her isolation, she is charge to see life with a mind supreme and elevated in judgement”.

 

 

“The Lady of Shalott: Pre-Raphaelite attitudes toward women in society”.  Meg Mariotti '05.5, English/History of Art 151, Pre-Raphaelites, Aesthetes, and Decadents, Brown University, 2004.  The Victorian Web. Inc. 3 Jan 2008  

http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/prb/mariotti12.html

 

 

Comparing the two poems, I can affirm that this critic approach can be applied to Mariana. In both poems we can see a woman isolated of the world, with any opportunity to change their situation. Both ladies should assume their passive role and the no-acceptance implies a fatal ending: when the lady of Shallot gets away from the tower, she goes from one way of captivity (the tower) to another (her death).  Similarly, the poem starts with a description of the landscape where she is imprisoned (as in Mariana), and in both cases the landscape is a way to express the women’s situation: the isle of Shallot is isolated and silent, as Mariana’s house (that reveals their situation of isolation). In the second poem, the author does not mention what the lady looks like, what she thinks or why she is cursed. We only hear her voice twice: when she looks out of the window and when she realises that the curse was real (and in Mariana we really hear her voice in two different phrases, too). What differs from one poem to the other is that the lady of Shallot faces her fear, not Mariana, despite the fact that she is a victim of her situation and there is nothing she can do to change it. In my opinion, what Tennyson has showed in these two poems is the embowered women, the female victim of her situation, her society and her condition of woman, and regarding The Lady of Shalott, it is the representation of the woman as an object of desire (the idealized woman who is surely desired by all men).

 

 

Now it is the turn of the female authors, who are Christina Rossetti and Elisabeth Barret Browning. During the Victorian Time a new kind of woman appears as a generous creature, capable, modest, something franker than a Frenchwoman, more to be trusted than an Italian, as brave as an American but more refined, faithful, with innate dignity and purity of her nature. There were a lot of discussions of women’s political and social rights and they extended themselves into a wide range of possibilities in different fields (as artists, workers, politics, critics, etc).

 

 

“The Victorian Age: Topic 2: Text and Contents”.  The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 2003-2008. W.W. Norton and Company. 20 Dec 2007 http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nael/victorian/topic_2/linton.htm

 

 

The first female author I have selected is Christina Rossetti and two of her works: Song and Monna Innominata.

 

Song is a short individual poem written in 1862. It is the speech of a dead lady to her lover. The female speaker claims to her lover that she must not be unhappy and sad because of her death, because she is happy. She does not want the devotional ritual that people make when a dear person dies (to sing sad songs, to offer roses, to plant cypresses). The lady assumes her death and she knows she maybe will be happy in heaven, and her lover maybe could be happy on earth. So, it is as if the lady says: “I know that the normal things are to pay tribute to the dead person, to be sad; but I am different, I am happy in heaven and I want for my lover to be happy, too. Darling, you do not need to be sad, because in a future time you will forget me, and in my case, I probably will forget you”.

Christina Rossetti provides a female view in front of other Victorian works that make women into objects as The Lady of Shalott or Mariana. Moreover, it is as if the author faces her brother’s poem The Blessed Damozel, where the lady needs her lover to be happy after her death. In Song, the lady is able to be happy in heaven on her owns. She feels no pain; there are not fears for the lady. Further on, the lady expresses indifference towards her lover when she says (lines 7-8: “And if thou wilt, remember,/ And if thou wilt, forget”), which is not typical of the love poems. Despite the fact that we do not have any clues about her age or if really the speaker is a woman, the way the speaker talks and the way the speaker thinks and acts is what make us think that it is a woman. Basically, the author of the poem rejected the traditional male role as the speaker and uses a female voice to tell to the readers her poem and to offer her view about love. Christina Rossetti offers a different perspective which we have not seen in other poems. For example, in The Lady of Shalott, the woman is an object of desire submitted to a curse; in Jenny, the lady is an object of desire again and there is any female voice; in Mariana the lady is subordinated to a lover who never comes; in The Blessed Damozel the damsel needs her lover to be happy in heaven (again the subordination of women to men); in My last Duchess the man has all control over her; and in Porphyria’s lover we do not hear the female voice, too, and she is dominated by the male. For those things, I can assure that we are in front of a new kind of poetry, the female poetry, where the female figure acts in the poems, she has narrative voice and she is not dependent of a man, she is free. In Song, Rossetti stands for the freedom of women who do not need a man to be happy and to triumph in life, they are equal than the men and they have the same rights than them, as well as they have voice and no-men can talk instead of them or can think by them. Song is not the typical love poem, where the lady suffers for his knight; it is a love poem where the author treats to express her view in favour of the equality of women, where the female voice reconfigures the poetic tradition.

 

Monna Innominata is a composition of sonnets written in 1881 and published in Poems in 1890 that shows a lady talking to her lover. At the beginning, the lady claims her love with the man, but as long as the poem improves its content, the lady assumes her role of being a free woman and decides to take the spiritual love, the love that merges herself with God.  For example, in the first sonnet we see the scene of the lady waiting for her lover (“O love, my world is you”). After, she talks about the first day they met, which she cannot remember, and the beautiful things he transmits to her, but then she states that she loved him at first, but now she gives preference to the spiritual love, with God in heaven. For that reason, death is a good option and she is not afraid of it. She suggests that her lover is free as she is free, too; and he can look for another girl (“If there be any one can take my place/ And make you happy whom I grieve to grieve,/ Think not that I can grudge it, but believe/ I do commend you to that nobler grace”). So, she is declaring that she prefers to die and to have a spiritual love with God in heaven where she is going to be happy eternally than their love on earth, she choose to forgo the pleasures of the earthly love for her faith. Moreover, the author states the idea of love and death, as she has done in other poems like Song. On the other hand, in the prelude of the poem Christina Rossetti states that she wants to give voice to the female figures that had been silenced during time, the heroic ladies of the world, the main characters of many poems and writings that had not voice in the past. We can see that in the fragment of this prelude: “The heroines of world-wide fame were preceded by a bevy of unnamed ladies 'donne innominate' sung by a school of less conspicuous poets; and in that land and that period which gave simultaneous birth to Catholics, to Albigenses, and to Troubadours, one can imagine many a lady as sharing her lover's poetic aptitude, while the barrier between them might be one held sacred by both, yet not such as to render mutual love incompatible with mutual honour. "Had such a lady spoken for herself, the portrait left us might have appeared more tender, if less dignified, than any drawn even by a devoted friend ...”. As well as she gives importance to what the main purpose of the poem is, she underlines Dante and Petrarch, and their heroines Beatrice and Laura.

 

 

Ian Lancashire for the Department of English, University of Toronto. Christina Rossetti: Monna Innominata: a Sonnet of Sonnets.  The Representative Poetry Online. 2005. RPO. 7 Jan 2008

http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poem/1754.html

 

 

At the beginning of each stanza, which is a complete sonnet, the author adds a short sentence or phrase from the writings of Dante and Petrarch, and it has been seen as the result of her admiration to these personalities or as a way to emphasize the importance of the female voice in her poem in contrast with their works. In my opinion, the Women “Innominate” are the unnamed ladies with no voice, and Rossetti wants to give real voice to Beatrice and Laura, the female characters of Dante and Petrarch, and she wants to express that the female figures have voice on its own as well as the male figures have it. It is like Christina Rossetti says: “it’s time to give to the historical muses the voice they deserve”. Although there are a lot of studies about the relations of Dante and Petrarch and their writings to the poem, and despite the fact that the poem has a literary-historical complexity due to the references to Dante, Petrarch, Keats and other writers, I have only read the poem in the topic of the female voice and the role of the woman in the poem. In that sense, the author strengthens that the female figure is not a silent object, she has voice, her own conscience and her own right and she takes her own decisions without asking to her lover. She is a woman who choose the spiritual salvation and who argues that her lover can have other beloved because her decision is well-rationalised and she is sure of it. The fact that the lady chooses the spiritual “love” reflects also the deep religious beliefs of the author, because the composition is plenty of biblical references as the River Jordan, or Esther, a biblical character.  Moreover, if we compare this female character with other female characters of the time, as the cursed lady of The Lady of Shalott, the dependent lady of The Blessed Damozel or the prostitute with no voice of Jenny, Christina Rossetti’s character is free, rational, and she handles her own life and her own decisions. 

 

Comparing these two poems, I can assure that Rossetti expresses some kind of reminiscences of devotion and the self-sacrifice of the woman who understands that her lover needs another woman to be happy. I both poems the author represents an independent woman, virtuous and self-confident, who decides what she wants to be, what she wants to do without any troubles with her lover, and who only needs the spiritual love that God gives her on earth and in heaven. The women are not objects of desire, there are voices that claim their rights and their freedom. As we have seen in the analysis of Song, Christina Rossetti offers a different perspective which we have not seen in other poems. For example, in The Lady of Shalott, the woman is an object of desire submitted to a curse; in Jenny, the lady is an object of desire (a prostitute) with no voice; in Mariana the lady is subordinated to a lover who never comes; in The Blessed Damozel the damsel is dependent of her lover to be happy, even in heaven; in My last Duchess the man has all control over her; and in Porphyria’s lover we do not hear the female voice, too, and she is dominated by the male. In these poems, all women are victims of their condition of woman due to the inequalities of their society. So, in my opinion, Christina Rossetti creates a new poetry that emphasizes the female voice and fights against the male domination not only in poetry, but also in literature and in the whole society, too.

 

The following female author I have analysed is Elisabeth Barret Browning and her “novel in verse” Aurora Leigh.

 

Aurora Leigh is called “novel-poem” due to its extension, the way the author relates the acts and actions, the complete story it presents and its blank verse. This poem (1856) presents the autobiography of Aurora Leigh who tells us the story of her life through nine books. This poem, which is a long poem, is considered one of the most powerful poems in its meaning, because it reflects much of the author’s feelings in different fields.

 

Summarising the poem, it presents Aurora, a female poet, who relates her autobiography for her better self. She tells us that she “have written much in prose and verse/ For others' uses, will write now for mine,–/ Will write my story for my better self,

As when you paint your portrait for a friend,/ Who keeps it in a drawer and looks at it/ Long after he has ceased to love you, just/ To hold together what he was and is”.

 

First Book: It presents Aurora’s childhood in Florence. Her mother (a Florentine) dies when she is four years old, and her father (an Englishman) has to educate her. They move to the mountains to be with the nature, and her father teaches her Greek and Latin. When she is thirteen, her father dies and she is sent to Leigh Hall (the family ancestral home) in England with her aunt, who tries to educate Aurora as a good lady, but she discovers her father’s library and she starts to read the books, enjoying the reading a lot. So, she acquires a great culture in literature and English poetry (she reads Keats, Byron and Pope’s works), as well as she learns Maths, Science, German, French, royal genealogies, music and dance, and catechism. Moreover, she meets Romney, her cousin.

 

Second Book: He is twenty years old, and she is woman and artist, but incomplete. Her cousin proposes marriage to her but she declines, because her artistic career is not compatible with her woman-wife role, and because Romney believes that women do not have the capacity of being artists. Her aunt gets upset because of her denial due to the fact that she was educated as a good lady and a responsible wife and she tries to teach it to Aurora. After a while, Aurora’s aunt dies. Romney is the heir of the family’s fortune and he offers to Aurora a share of money, but she prefers to move to London to start her artistic career as a poet on her own.

 

Third Book: Aurora is in London. She had written for cyclopaedias, magazines, weekly papers, and tales and articles holding up her name. One day, Lady Waldemar, a stranger, visits her and she explains that she loves her cousin Romney, but he wants to marry with Marian Erle, a low-class woman. Lady Waldemar wants Aurora to go to speak with Marian and she goes. Marian’s story was astonishing: her mother sold her as a prostitute and she escaped. Finally, she had met Romney and he provided her a job as a seamstress.

 

Fourth Book: Aurora continues with Marian. Marian assumes that, despite her lower class, she is going to be a devoted wife, but when the wedding is going to be celebrated, Marian sends a letter telling Romney that she is not good enough for him. The book ends explaining that Romney is displeased because he cannot help the people he wants to, and Aurora has not succeeded in writing yet.

 

Fifth Book: At the beginning, Aurora talks about her poetry and the difficulties she has because she is a woman. Moreover, Romney is going to marry with Lady Waldemar. At the end of the book, Aurora, to find her inspiration, decides to travel to Italy, her mother’s land.

 

Sixth Book: Aurora is in France. She describes Paris as a beautiful place. There, she sees Marian with a baby. She tries to find her during a week, and finally, they meet again and Marian invites Aurora to her house. Marian tells her that Lady Waldemar sent her to France with her maid and then she was left in a brothel where she was raped and she got pregnant.

 

Seventh Book: Marian continues her narration: she was taken as a maid but she was fired due to her pregnancy. Aurora decides to look after Marian and her baby, and they travel to Italy together. Aurora also writes a letter to Lady Waldemar saying that she must make happy her cousin because she is aware of the way she treated Marian. Moreover, Aurora receives a letter to congratulate her on her book from a friend.

 

Eighth Book: They are in Florence. Romney arrives to tell Aurora that the Leigh Hall, which was transformed in a refuge for poor people, had been burned. Furthermore, he congratulates her on her book. Aurora finds out that her cousin is not married yet and he gives her a letter from Lady Waldemar.

 

Ninth Book: Aurora reads the letter and she notices that Romney lover her, not Lady Waldemar. Despite of that, Aurora proposes to her cousin the idea of been married with Marian, but she rejectes. Finally, Aurora admits that she loves him (she denied his proposal of marriage in the past because Romney believes women cannot be poets, but he had congratulated her and he admitted that she was good as a man could be). The long poem ends with the hug of two lovers.

 

Aurora Leigh is supposed to be a autobiographical poem, because at the beginning of it we read: “Of writing many books there is no end;/ And I who have written much in prose and verse/ For others' uses, will write now for mine,–/ Will write my story for my better self, / As when you paint your portrait for a friend,/ Who keeps it in a drawer and looks at it/ Long after he has ceased to love you, just/ To hold together what he was and is”. What is not clear is if the poem is the part-real story of Elisabeth Barret Browning, or an invention used to show her ideals. Analysing her biography, we notice that Browning’s mother died when she was twenty-two years old. Aurora lost her mother when she was four years old, and it could reflect her feelings of loss for her own mother. Moreover, Aurora’s father also died when she was young. It contradicts with Elisabeth Barret Browning’s life, because her father died four years before her own death. But both fathers encouraged her daughters in their literary career: Aurora’s father taught her Greek and Latin, and Browning’s father helped her in the publication of The Battle of Marathon when she was only fourteen years old. Finally, Aurora accepted Romney when he congratulated her on her book, and Elisabeth Barret Browning met Robert Browning when he wrote her a letter after the publication of Poems. These are the main coincidences in the lives of Elisabeth Barret Browning and Aurora Leigh, and these are the coincidences that raise the question of the autobiography or fictional biography in Aurora Leigh.

 

 

Wayne Huang '97 (English 168 Sec. 2, 1996).  “Problems of Autobiography and Fictional Autobiography in Aurora Leigh”. The Victorian Web. Inc. 4 Jan 2008

http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/ebb/huangal.html

 

 

What is really important of that poem in our analysis of the female voice and the women’s role in Victorian Time is that Aurora Leigh is one of the better expressions of feminism in the Victorian poetry. It is a clear representation of the women’s role and a statement of intent: a declaration against the oppression and the inequality that women suffered during the Victorian Time. Elisabeth Barret Browning uses Aurora to defend her ideals in this field: she is an independent woman, intelligent, educated in very different fields, who rejects the “normal” female role in that time: the woman must stay at home, looking after her husband and her children, she cannot be an artist and she cannot enjoy her world as a free person. Aurora defends her right to be a poet, and she relates the difficulties she has to become a well-known and a prestigious artist. Moreover, Browning uses Aurora as an example that women can break these difficulties to reach their dreams, because they do not have to follow the standard mind.

 

First of all, I want to emphasize that the author shows some different representations of women. In the First Book, she describes the different incarnations of women in literature by male writers:

 

“Ghost, fiend, and angel, fairy, witch, and sprite,–

A dauntless Muse who eyes a dreadful Fate,

A loving Psyche who loses sight of Love,

A still Medusa, with mild milky brows

All curdled and all clothed upon with snakes

Whose slime falls fast as sweat will; or, anon,

Our Lady of the Passion, stabbed with swords

Where the Babe sucked; or, Lamia in her first

Moonlighted pallor, ere she shrunk and blinked,

And, shuddering, wriggled down to the unclean;

Or, my own mother, leaving her last smile

In her last kiss, upon the baby-mouth”

 

 

Elisabeth Barret Browning. Aurora Leigh. London: J. Miller. 1864. A celebration of women Writers. Mary Mark 1994-2003. <http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/barrett/aurora/aurora.html>

 

 

Elisabeth Barret Browning’s female figure is not a ghost, not an angel or a Medusa; she is the culmination of all these representations, the complete women, who is able to score a hit in her life, who can obtain whatever she wants to. This fighter woman teaches us the power that a woman has, and she showed to the Victorian society, and to their readers, that the power of a pen is stronger than any other weapon. I have selected some passages of the poem where the author, through the speaker, takes a stand in the Woman Question:

 

SECOND BOOK:

-“Men and women make the world as head and heart make human life” (Romney)

-“If your sex is weak for art, it is strong for life and duty” (Romney to Aurora)

-“You misconceive the question like a man, who sees a woman as the complement of his sex merely. You forget too much that every creature, female and male, stands single in responsible act and thought, in birth and death” (Aurora to Romney)

-“This boy is generous and prepared to carry out his kindest word and thought to you”/ “I instruct you how to eat, drink, stand or sit, even lie” (Aurora’s aunt to Aurora)

 

FOURTH BOOK:

-“If marriage be a contract, contracting parties should be equal” (Aurora)

-“How arrogant men are. Who try to take a wife up in the way they put down a subscription-cheque? / I suppose we women should remember what we are” (Aurora)

 

FIFTH BOOK:

-“We women are too apt to look to one, which proves a certain impotence in art” (Aurora’s aunt)

-“Must I work in vain, without the approbation of a man? It cannot be, it shall not be” (Aurora)

-“My ballads prospered, but the ballad’s race is rapid for a poet who bear weights of thought and golden image” (Aurora)

 

SEVENTH BOOK:

-“The world’s male chivalry has perished out, but women are knights-errant to the last- and if Cervantes had been greater hill, he had made his Don a Donna” (Aurora)

 

EIGHTH BOOK:

-“If he cannot work with us (women), he will work over us. Does he want a man, much less a woman?” (Aurora)

-“Let us be content, in work, to do the thing we can, and not presume to fret because it’s little” (Aurora)

“A woman cannot do the thing she ought, which means whatever perfect thing she can, in life, in art, in science, but she fears to let the perfect action take her part and rest there: she must prove what she can do before she does it, -a prate of woman’s right- of woman’s mission, woman’s function, till the men (who are prating, too, on their side) cry, poor souls, they are very reasonable vexed! They cannot hear each other speak” (Aurora’s declaration of women’s rights)

-“By speaking we prove only we can speak: which he, the man here, never doubted. What he doubts, is whether we can do the thing with decent grace, we’ve not yet done at all” (Aurora)

 

NINTH BOOK:

-“Male poets are preferable, tiring less and teaching more” (Lady Waldemar)

-“I, Aurora, fell from mine: I would not be a woman like the rest, a simple woman who believes in love, and owns the right of love because she loves, and, hearing she’s beloved, is satisfied with what contents God: I must analyse, confront, and question; just as if a fly” (Aurora).

 

 

Elisabeth Barret Browning. Aurora Leigh. London: J. Miller. 1864. A celebration of women Writers. Mary Mark 1994-2003. <http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/barrett/aurora/aurora.html>

 

 

As we can understand reading this long poem, Elisabeth Barret Browning uses the fictional characters to show her own feelings and thoughts. Aurora Leigh is a declaration of her author in the sense of the Woman Question: she urges to fight the situation women suffered, and she demands to the women to finish with their unequal situation, and using her poetry, she tries to make aware of this situation to help to the women to fight it, to change the society and the social mind. In Aurora Leigh, the author represents different kinds of women: Aurora’s aunt is the “ideal” woman in society, the “perfect” lady; Marian is the lower-class woman who decides to start her life in her own way (the first step in this fight) and Aurora is the incarnation of the fighter woman, who depends only on herself, who faces up to the society and who breaks the rules. As Aurora states in the poem: “I would not be a woman like the rest, a simple woman who believes in love, and owns the right of love because she loves, and, hearing she’s beloved, is satisfied with what contents God: I must analyse, confront, and question; just as if a fly” (Ninth Book).

 

Aurora was different, she recognises it. But she was different in a positive way: she tries to get better the society in the things that were wrong. The Woman Question was an important issue during the Victorian Time. It was when many women start to raise their voices to get equality in the society, in politics, economics and religious terms. The role of women was to have children and tend to the house, in contrast to men, according to the concept of Victorian masculinity. They could not hold a job unless it was that of a teacher or a domestic servant, nor were they allowed to have their own checking accounts or savings accounts, and much less to be artists. Moreover, women were under men’s domination: sisters had to treat their brothers as they would treat their future husbands. They were dependent on their male family members until they get married (men ensure certain stability). In addition, women were educated unequal: subjects such as history, geography and general literature were of importance, whereas Latin and Greek were of little importance (in contrast with Aurora’s education: her father taught her Latin and Greek). In the legal aspect, there were inequalities, too. Fathers had all the responsibility over their children (they received custody). Furthermore, while the husband only had to prove his wife's adultery, a woman had to prove her husband had not only committed adultery but also incest, bigamy, cruelty or desertion.

 

 

"Women in the Victorian era." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 10 Jan 2008, 17:58 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 10 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_the_Victorian_era&oldid=184778646.

 

 

Changes started during the 19th century, when in 1873 the Custody of Infants Act extended access to children to all women in the event of separation or divorce. In 1878, after an amendment to the Matrimonial Causes Act, women could secure a separation on the grounds of cruelty and claim custody of their children. An important change was caused by an amendment to the Married Women's Property Act in 1884 that made a woman no longer a property of a men but an independent and separate person. Another improvement in that sense was made through the Guardianship of Infants Act in 1886, when women could be made the sole guardian of their children if their husband died.

 

 

"Women in the Victorian era." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 10 Jan 2008, 17:58 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 10 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_the_Victorian_era&oldid=184778646

 

 

In conclusion, the Victorian Era was a period of inequalities between women and men, but also the period when important changes started in this field. We have seen that, using poetry, and art in general, people have fight the inequalities of their society. Thought the analysis of the main poems in that époque, we can understand the women’s role in that Era, and also the female voice which was projected, or invented, in some cases. Using the male authors I have analysed we can understand the female role in poetry and the lack of voice that women had, despite the fact that these male poets represented women as victims of the society in general (because of a tragic love, of death, of her status…).

 

As a summary, Robert Browning talks about a woman in My last Duchess but we do not hear her voice, and what is show is that the man has all control over her, and in Porphyria’s lover we do not hear the female voice, too, and she is dominated by the male. Dante Gabriel Rossetti represents in Jenny a prostitute, the lady is an object of desire again and there is any female voice and The Blessed Damozel shows that the damsel needs her lover to be happy in heaven (again the subordination of women to men). Additionally, Lord Alfred Tennyson uses The Lady of Shalott to represent a woman as an object of desire submitted to a curse, and, in Mariana, the lady is subordinated to a lover who never comes. On the other hand, the female writers represent another kind of woman. Christina Rossetti, in her poem Song, stands for an independent woman who do not need a man to triumph in life, equal than the men and with the same rights; and Monna Innominata is a poem where we can see the power of a female voice. Finally, Elisabeth Barret Browning represents a fighter, a woman who knows what she want and who tries to reach their aims without any men’s help. I think that it is a declaration of the women’s rights but using a poetical form.  

 

In my opinion, this analysis is a great way to study an era, but using poetry. And what is greater is the fact that some poets used their poetry to show their inclinations in order to improve what they thought that was unequal in society. Despite the fact that women belonged to different social classes, and each had its own organisation (higher-class women were presumably happy with their situation); what is clear is that it was not equal for all the people, and as an irregularity, it must be changed.

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES:

 

(1)- Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Astarte Syriaca. 1877. Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagen:Astarte_Syriaca.jpg

 

(2)- Fernand Khnopff. Medusa. 1900. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/khnopff/sculpture/3.html

 

(3)- Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Found. 1853/1859. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/dgr/paintings/11.html

 

(4)- Sir John Everett Millais. Ophelia. 1852. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Millais_-_Ophelia.jpg

 

(5)- Hiram Powers. The Greek Slave. 1851. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/sculpture/usa/powers2.html

 

(6)- George Frederick Watts. Orpheus and Eurydice. 1817-1904. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/watts/paintings/1.html

 

(7)- John William Waterhouse. St Eulalia. 1885. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/jww/paintings/eulalia.html

 

(8)- Edward Burne-Jones. Sleeping beauty. 1870-1890. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeping_Beauty

 

(9)- Arthur Hughes. The Lady of Shalott. 1873. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/hughes/paintings/7.html

 

(10)- John William Waterhouse. The Lady of Shallot. 1888. The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/jww/paintings/shalott2.html

 

(11)- Dante Gabriel Rossetti. The Lady of Shalott. 1857. Published in Lord Tennyson’s Poems (London: E. Moxon, 1857). The Victorian Web. http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/dgr/8.html

 

(12)- Dante Gabriel Rossetti. The Girlhood of Mary. 1848-1849. The Artchive. http://www.artchive.com/artchive/R/rossetti/rossetti_girlhood.jpg.html

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

 

-“Women as subject in Victorian Art- representations of women”. 25/12/2006. The Victorian Web. Inc. 21/12/2007

http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/arts2.html

 

-"Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 8 Dec 2007, 18:52 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 7 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pre-Raphaelite_Brotherhood&oldid=176611969>  

 

-"Mariana." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 9 Jan 2008, . Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 9 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariana&oldid=183146557

 

- Erin Frauenhofer '09, English 151.  “Men vs women: illustrating “The Lady of Shalott””. Brown University, 2003. The Victorian Web. Inc. 3 Jan 2007 <http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/tennyson/frauenhofer.html>

Extracted from: Nelson, Elizabeth. "Tennyson and the Ladies of Shalott. " Ladies of Shalott: A Victorian Masterpiece and its Contexts. Providence: Brown University Department of Art, 1985.

 

-“The Lady of Shalott: Pre-Raphaelite attitudes toward women in society”.  Meg Mariotti '05.5, English/History of Art 151, Pre-Raphaelites, Aesthetes, and Decadents, Brown University, 2004.  The Victorian Web. Inc. 3 Jan 2008  

http://www.victorianweb.org/painting/prb/mariotti12.html

 

-“The Victorian Age: Topic 2: Text and Contents”.  The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 2003-2008. W.W. Norton and Company. 20 Dec 2007 http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nael/victorian/topic_2/linton.htm

 

- Ian Lancashire for the Department of English, University of Toronto. Christina Rossetti: Monna Innominata: a Sonnet of Sonnets.  The Representative Poetry Online. 2005. RPO. 7 Jan 2008

http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poem/1754.html

 

- Wayne Huang '97 (English 168 Sec. 2, 1996).  “Problems of Autobiography and Fictional Autobiography in Aurora Leigh”. The Victorian Web. Inc. 4 Jan 2008

http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/ebb/huangal.html

 

-Elisabeth Barret Browning. Aurora Leigh. London: J. Miller. 1864. A celebration of women Writers. Mary Mark 1994-2003. <http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/barrett/aurora/aurora.html>

 

-"Women in the Victorian era." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 10 Jan 2008, 17:58 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 10 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_the_Victorian_era&oldid=184778646.

 

-G. B. Harrison. A book of English Poetry: Chaucer to Rossetti. Harmondsworth (Gran Bretaña). Penguin Books. 1986.

 

-Tennysson, Alfred; traducido por Antonio Rivero taravillo. La dama de Shalott, y otros poemas. Valencia: Pre-textos, 2002.

 

-M. Gent, et al. Victorian Poetry. Edinburgh :Edward Arnold, 1972.

 

-R. W. Hill. Tennyson’s Poetry. New York; W.W. Norton and Company, 1999.