THEATRE OF THE ABSURD

 

Theatre of the Absurd is a term that refers to the tendency of the dramatic literature that is found in France during 1940-1950. This tendency stirs up the classic notions of the action, the language… in plays; and the plays that can be found in this tendency reflect an illogic chaos, which can be seen in the society, using humour. The founders of this tendency were Eugene Ionesco, Samuel Beckett and Arthur Adamov, and others. In addition, other important dramaturges in this tendency are Edward Bond, Harold Pinter, Tom Stoppard, Jean Genet …

                                                       

   [Teatro Del Absurdo. Ed. Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. 2001. 22 Dec. 2005.]

         http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_del_absurdo

 

Absurd authors wanted to represent the doubts about the life, the world… and to express it, they use metaphors, and a particular language. In Absurd plays the communication among characters isn’t enough. For example, in “Waiting for Godot” (Samuel Beckett), the characters don’t understand one to other, the communication in this play is bad. Using it, authors represent the bad communication that exists in society, among people in general. In the Absurd Theatre plays we can also emphasize that the characters are discovered in a world which they do not understand, and this world is very absurd. In the plays (for instance, in “Waiting for Godot”) characters pass the time talking without sense, without hearing the other, or for instance, they play… (for example in “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead” the characters play to guess “head or tail”). The time isn’t important in these plays.

 

[Lecture on Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Ed. Ian Johnston. 1999. 23Dec. 2005.]

    < http://www.malaspina.edu/%7ejohnstoi/introser/stoppard.htm>

 

Furthermore the characters want to express something but they can’t, they are contradicting other characters or him / herself. Sometimes the action contradicts the words that characters have pronounced. Moreover some techniques of the Theatre of the Absurd are the use of a peculiar decoration in the stage, often very simple, where accessories and objects are stressed, because they are important in the development of the action; and the representation of non-sense situations that express the doubts of the world, the bad understanding of life… The plot in Absurd plays seems to lack meaning and sense, the dialogues are often repetitive, and sometimes the action doesn’t seem to have sequence and sense, too. 

Some important plays in this tendency are “Waiting for Godot” (1952), by Samuel Beckett; “El Rinoceronte” (1956), by Ionesco, “La cantante calva” (1950) by Ionesco, too…and more. We can emphasize that few authors use the label “Absurd” for their plays. But three authors are undoubtedly important in the Theatre of the Absurd: Beckett, Pinter and Stoppard.

 

[Lecture on Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Ed. Ian Johnston. 1999. 22Dec. 2005.]

    < http://www.malaspina.edu/%7ejohnstoi/introser/stoppard.htm>

 

<Enciclopedia Gran Larousee Universal. Ed. Plaza y Janes, 1979>

 

<Enciclopedia Microsoft Encarta 2003>

 

Samuel Beckett with his play “Waiting for Godot” represents very well this type of theatre. In this play, we can see two main characters that are waiting for nothing. They are living, and they are passing the time. Their lives do not make sense, and in the play, for example, they propose to hang themselves. It reflects the absurdness of the world, the absurdness of the life. These characters have ridiculous conversations and sometimes these conversations do not make sense. Both characters have a poor communication, because they don’t hear one to other. The action in this play doesn’t seem to have sense, because it is very repetitive and the reader could not understand the play. The play takes place in a field (very simple stage). Furthermore, the plot and the topic in the play don’t seem to make sense at first, it seems to be ridiculous, but later, it changes.

Beckett served as influence for a lot of authors.

 

< Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. Ed. Faber and Faber Limited. Great Britain, 1956>

 

Another important author is Harold Pinter. We can emphasize his play “The Dumb Waiter”, where we can see two main characters (assassins) that are waiting in a basement for their victim. Similar to “Waiting for Godot”, the characters are waiting, and they pass the time talking but one doesn’t hear the other. In this way, Pinter reflects the life, the wrong society, the absurdness of the world and the poor communication amongst people. The characters often contradict themselves with commentaries that sometimes have different interpretations. Pinter uses poor grammar and a lot of repetitions, and something that is very common in Pinter’s plays: the use of silence and pauses. It gives to the play a frightening atmosphere and in his Absurd plays, an uncertain atmosphere. The decoration is very simple, too, like in “Waiting for Godot”, because the action occurs in a basement.  The action in the play is very common in plays of the Theatre of the Absurd: it has odd acts, very amazing and often illogical.

 

<Pinter, Harold. The Dumb Waiter. England, 1957>

 

To sum up, we can stress other author: Tom Stoppard and his play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead”. In it appear two main characters like in “Waiting for Godot” and “The Dumb Waiter”. They pass the time questioning themselves about life, the world, and fortune, and also they play. Another characteristic that the Theatre of the Absurd uses is to put the death as a normal thing, because it’s a normal process in the life. In this play, the action is very odd, too, because at first we could not understand the play well.

 

<Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Ed. Samuel French. London. 1967>

 

In my opinion, the Theatre of the Absurd is a good tendency, very famous during 1650-1960. The Absurd authors seem to have reasons for the fight against the society, and they want to explain the society, the world, and the life using a different point of view: as an absurd world, an absurd universe. The characteristic used in these plays are very peculiar, and using them, the authors can express these situations that are an extreme position against the society. Some of these authors explain in their plays some doubts that are in the society and in the mind of people. These authors wrote good plays and if we make an effort, we can enjoy a lot with these plays, because they represent the society and the world in a different way.

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES:

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_del_absurdo

http://www.malaspina.edu/%7ejohnstoi/introser/stoppard.htm

-Microsoft Encarta 2003

- Enciclopedia Gran Larousse Universal. Ed. Plaza y Janes, 1979.

- Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. Ed. Faber and Faber Limited. Great Britain, 1956.

-Pinter, Harold. The Dumb Waiter. England, 1957.

-Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Ed. Samuel French. London. 1967.