W. BLAKE AND G.M.
HOPKINS
BIOGRAPHIES:
W. Blake was born (1757) and died
(1827) both in
His family was part of the Dissenters, a well-known sect and it is
because of that why his work is influenced by the Bible.
He was taught by Basire and after he took part of the
He married Catherine Boucher but he hadnīt got any sons or daughters.
G.M. Hopkins was born in 1844
and died in 1889 in
because he succeed later than his work appeared. His
innovations were the sprung rhythm which consists on a structure around feet
with a variable number of syllables, generally between one and four syllables
per foot, with the stress always falling on the first syllable in a foot. He
was a little bit confused about his sexuality. In reference to religion he
converted form Anglicanism to Roman Catholicism and he wrote some music for
church occasions. He lived as a Jesuist. He worked as a teacher but he was not
so effective. Referring to his work, it was influenced by erotism and the use
of vocabulary was rich because of the use of rethorical figures such as
alliteration, assonance, onomatopoeia and rhyme.
What are the similarities between these
two poets in general aspects?
Both of them were so much interested in painting.
Any of them had children, Blake and his wife couldnīt have children and
in the case of
Blake based his poems in avoiding slavery, equality of both sex and race
and the rejection of imposed authority and Hopkinsī works were affected by his
state of depression.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Blake
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_Manley_Hopkins
What about Romanticism?
Romanticism is an artistic, political, social and ideologic revolution
so much important that some of its principles such as freedom, nacionalism, democracy,...still
persist nowadays. It appeared between 1770 and 1800 thanks to all the
revolutions taken place in that time; the Industrial revolution, the French
revolution and the American revolution.
Beauty in nature is the most relevant aspect but not the only one
because we can also find funereal reasons as well as supernatural ones in this
period.
For romantics, love to nature can determine their own personality and
mood. Nature is always present in their emotions and pains.
Romanticism is different depending of the country, each country has its
own bases and detailed ideas about Romanticism.
Modernism arrives with Romanticism.
Romantics oppose themselves to the division of reason and feelings and
between reality and unreality.
Nature for these Romantics poets was considered the link between humans
and God.
The arguments more used in poems written by Romantics were: Egocentrism,
freedom and love and death. Innermost psychology was the real theme literature
of this time is going to deal with.
http://www.monografias.com/trabajos6/roma/roma.shtml
What about Victorian
Age?
Victoria Age is a term used to define Queenīs Victoria reign
(1837-1901). During her reign there were lots of big changes in all these
aspects: Politics, culture, economy, industrial and scientific.
There were also social changes which affected women in a possitive way;
women rights permitted them to divorce as well as having their own possessions.
Culture and modernism were strongly linked at that time.
Some purposes which had just been fought in Romanticism were obtained
during Queen Victoriaīs time. (Purposes related to slavery and nature).
In
The most important developments in this time were in political and also
in cultural aspects.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89poca_victoriana
SPRING
By
Now it's mute!
Bird's delight,
Day and night,
Nightingale,
In the dale,
Lark in sky,
Merrily,
Merrily merrily, to welcome in the year.
Little boy,
Full of joy;
Little girl,
Sweet and small;
Cock does crow,
So do you;
Merry voice,
Infant noise;
Merrily, merrily, to welcome in the year.
Little lamb,
Here I am;
Come and lick
My white neck;
Let me pull
Your soft wool;
Let me kiss
Your soft face;
Merrily, merrily, to welcome in the year.
http://poemaseningles.blogspot.com/2006/04/william-blake-spring.html
Comments about the
poem:
As we can see after having read the poem, the most general aspect
William Blake as a romantic poet has based his poem on is nature, a very common
theme as we can see in the definition of Romanticism.
Vocabulary reflects this statement. We can clearly distinguish one
semantic field as there is animals and we can observe also words related to
hopefulness.
For example: Animals: Birds,
lark, nightingale, cock, lamb.
Hopefulness: Merrily, joy, sweet, kiss, soft, welcome.
By reading this poem we can easily recognize which period it comes from
because of the main subject. The title, "spring" which is a beautiful
season indicates us that it is going to talk about changes in environment
(weather and animalīs way of life). On the other hand we have to notice the
publication of the first sentence in which the author writes about an
instrument, a flute, making reference to another important aspect of that time,
music, which was also extremely special for the author, William Blake loved it.
Last sentence in each stanza is the one which defines what spring is for
the author, the welcome in the year, when flowers start to appear and
everything is colourful.
People enjoy this spring time, the importance is in nature, nature can
change peopleīs mood and makes everything different. This statement can be
proved in everyday life, when it is rainy or cloudy we are sad, angry,... and
when the sun is rising we are happy, funny,... isnīt it?
PIED BEAUTY
Glory be to God for dappled things
For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow;
For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim;
Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches wings;
Landscape plotted and piecedfold, fallow, and plough;
And all trades, their gear and tackle and trim.
All things counter, original, spare, strange;
Whatever is fickle, freckled (who knows how?)
With swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim;
He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change:
Praise him.
http://poemaseningles.blogspot.com/2005_09_01_archive.html
Comments about the poem:
In this poem it is clear how
Both Romantic and Victorian poets are interested in the creation of
nature, and because of that in God, who was its creator. These authors who
comprise Romanticism and the Victorian Era consider nature and supernatural
things more important than personal aspects. What for the majority of us is
insignificant and usual, for instance: "a brinded cow" or a
"trout"; living creatures, for the author are marvellous beings that
we have to admire.
The second and last stanza of this poem is like a summary of what do we have
to thank for and also the way these things can be.
Hopkinsī poems are very closely related to God and things like that,
heaven, perfection, wedding,... we can find it in the titles he uses for his
poems. For instance: "HeavenHaven", "At the Wedding March"...
Similarities between
these two poems in relation to the periods in which they were written.
Conclusion:
William Blake and Gerard Manley Hopkins have been two well-known poets but
both of them have been recognised after their death. Only by observing the
title of some of their poems we can notice that nature is present.
"Spring" is a word that
describes a period of time comprising some months of the year in which
environment changes and the author makes use of it to explain how beautiful
things are, specially in nature and how people feel when spring arrives, how an
immaterial thing which you canīt touch can affect so much peopleīs mood.
"Spring" is the title of one of
Blakeīs poems, the one I have chosen to do the paper. In this poem we can find
words related to nature at the same time that we can take into account the
importance of music. Everything seems to be more marvellous if we have got
music.
On the other hand we have got Hopkinīs poem, the one that is also
related to nature but it is nearer to religious aspects because of its
influence in Hopkinīs life.
This poem, "Pied Beauty" is too direct. It is perfectly
addressed to this divinity called God, the Creator. First of all, the poet
gives an explanation of how things are thanks to God, and after that, through
that list of words,
It could be difficult to distinguish poets because the themes treated
were the same, they were leaded by the same canons of the time, and the poems
used to be possitive: beauty of nature, hope in religion,... completely
different from nowadays that we have lots of controversial themes to write
about: bad treatment, contamination, politics,...
The aspect that I want to highlight after having read these two poems is
that nowadays people is not as conscious as they were at that time. We donīt
admire nature because we have artificial things that can replace what the Earth
gave us one day but lots of problems are deriving from this state of
couldnīt-care-less-attitude such as contamination,... and not so far from here
we wonīt be able to stop.