Necessarily, Scott’s influence was felt more drastically in Scotland than
elsewhere. The
enormous interest aroused there by the publication of his poetic romances
and then of his
novels we can now hardly realise. It quite outvied that immediately caused
by the poetry of
Burns, who, to use Burns’s own expression, was less “respected” during
his life than he
gradually came to be after his death. While some aspects of Scott’s presentations
of the past
called forth, at first, some protests from the stricter sectarians, the
general attitude towards
them was that of enthusiastic appreciation; and it is hardly possible to
exaggerate their effect in
liberating Scotland from the trammels of social and religious tradition.
He did not, however,
found a poetic school in Scotland. In England, he had various poetic imitators
that are now
forgotten; and he had, further, a good deal to do with the predominance
of narrative in
subsequent English verse. Byron, also, was directly indebted to him in
the case of his narrative
verse, and echoes of his method and manner are even to be found in Macaulay’s
Lays of
Ancient Rome. In fiction, he may almost be reckoned the founder of the
historical romance, in
which he has had many successors, both in this country and abroad; and,
if Smollett was his
predecessor in the Scottish novel, and is more responsible than he for
the earlier novels of
Galt, Scott may be deemed the originator of a pretty voluminous Scottish
romantic school, of
which the most distinguished representative is R. L. Stevenson; while,
with Smollett and Galt,
he has been the forerunner of a vernacular school of fiction which, within
late years, developed
into a variety to which the term “kailyard” has, with more or less appositeness,
been applied.
On the continent, Scott shared with Byron a vogue denied to all other English
writers except
Shakespeare, and his influence was closely interwoven with the romantic
movement there, and,
more especially, with its progress in France.