Paper
2
“The oppressión”
“The Dumd Waiter, “The Collection”
and “Ashes to Ashes”
Harold Pinter
Consuelo Hernández Rubio
The three plays by Harold Pinter, “The Dumb Walter”, “The
Collection” and “Ashes to
Ashes”, are developed in an only act, where the scenes are
played in closed spaces. The three plays start with the presentation of
these closed places:
-“The Dumb Waiter”: pag.129: “Scene: A basement room. Two beds,
flat against the back wall. A serving hatch, closed,
between the beds….”
-“The Collection”:pag.120:”The
stage is divided into three areas, two
peninsulas and a promontory….”,”Upstage centre on
promontory,
telephone box”.
-“Ashes to Ashes”: pag.393: “A house in the country. Ground-floor
room….”
This presentation
of the space where are developed the plays produce “OPPRESSION” in the characters and this aspect is transferred
to the lector or spectator with the intention that he think.
There also is a “OPPRESSION” of the human being
through a manipulative language, and with a vocabulary with negative
connotations.
And we can also see and
feel this “OPPRESSION” in some
moments through the kind of illumination that is used.
-“The Dumb Waiter”: -pag.133-134: Gus: “I wouldn’t like to
live in
this
dump. I wouldn’t mind if you had a window, you could see what it
looked like outside”; Gus: ”Well, I like to have a bit of a view,
Ben….”;
-pag.134: Gus: ”Don’t you ever get a bit fed up?.
I would say that the
dump means the oppressive life that the
characters are living and
the window means the liberty that they need to
go out of this kind of
life.
-“The Collection”: -pag.120: Upstage centre on promontory, telephone
box;-pag.127: Fade to blackout. Fade up moonlight in flat;
-pag.128:
Bill(closing
door). “Do forgive me”; James: (foot
in door).Look . I want
to speak to you”; Bill: ”You can’t just barge into someone’s house like
this, you know.
What do you want?”; “I could call the police”;-pag. 129:
Bill: “You’re not my guest,
you’re an intruder”.
Bill wants avoid listening the
truth, he doesn’t want listening the
problems which himself
is causing as a lover of Stella. It’s the reason
why he closes the door.
He leaves out what is out of his space and his
control.
-“Ashes to Ashes”: -pag.393: At the end of the play…The lamplight has
become very bright but does not illumine the room;-pag.399: Devlin: “I
know nothing…I’m in the dark. I need light”;-pag.406-407: Rebeca:
”...He used to go to the local railway station and walk down the
platform and tear
all the babies from the arms of their screaming
mothers”;-pag.408: Rebeca: “I
hate it fading away. I hate it echoing
away. I hate…”.-pag.412: Devlin: I’m in a quisksand; -pag.413: Devlin:
“I
inferred from this that you were talking about some kind of atrocity.”
-pag.414: Devlin: “The
man who tried to murder you”…”Do you to
death.”-pags.429-433: echo (SUFFERING, OPPRESSION)
All of the sentences shows us the own suffering of the
life lived by the
characters.
In these closed
spaces, the characters keep unpredictable and intriguing dialogues
through which the author is showing up us the relationships between them.
Harold Pinter doesn’t tell us what is the relation between the characters.
We’re who have to guess it through their conversations. So, in:
-“The Dumb Waiter”, Ben and Gus have a job’s relation:
-pag.131:
Gus: “I hope it won’t be a long job, this one”;
-pag.135: Ben: “We’ll be
on the job in a minute”.
-“The Collection”: -Stella and James are married: -pag.131:
James:
“ My wife was in there”.
-Bill and Harry are living in a flat
together: -pag.123:
Harry:
“I tripped on the stair rod!”…
Bill: “I did fix it”
Harry:...”Well...Where’s my fruit juice?”
-Stella and Bill are lovers: -pag.131: James: “That’s where you slept
with her”
-All of them are neighbour: -pag.153: Harry:
“You and your wife…
Funny we’ve never met, living so close, all in the
same trade, eh?”
-“Ashes to Ashes”, Rebeca and Devlin are couple:
-pags.397-399:
Devlin: “Do you feel you’re being hypnotised?”…
Rebeca: “Who by?”
Devlin: “By me”….”I’m compelled to ask you
questions….Or do you
think my questions are
illegitimate?”
OPINION
I think that the
three plays are enough difficult. When I was reading and analysing it looking
for some aspects in common, I have discovered the excellent and intelligent
ability of the author to get a oppressive
sensation, a sensation of necessity
of breathing, a sensation of necessity
of complain inside me through a manipulative and intriguing language
and dialogues between the characters.
In my opinion it’s exactly
that sensation what the author is looking for.