Theatrical lecture Module
“WAITING FOR GODOT”
by Samuel Beckett
“Waiting for Godot. A tragicomedy
in two acts” was written by Samuel Becket in 1955 and was first presented in
There
are two principal characters: Vladimir y Estragon. They have a good relation. I
think they are friends. They are often agree with each other about they are
talking. We do not know about their physical characteristics. About Estragon I
have to say that he loses her memory oftentimes. Their friendship of both
characters is shown for example when they argue about who
first hang oneself. There are other characters in this play. Pozzo and Lucky.
Lucky is ordered by Pozzo. He does all that Pozzo order. He is as his slave. Lucky talks only few
moments. There is another characters who talks to
Two
men meet near a tree and . Estragon is trying to take off
his boot and
The
space in this play is very simple. On stage is a tree
and a kind of stone. The space does not changes during
the play. The play is divided into two acts, both of them share the time, that is to say, the characters are talking in the same
moment of the day, the evening. We can check this at the beginning of the first
act: “A country road. A
tree. Evening”, and at the beginning of the second act: “Next day. Same Time.
Same Place.”
The
language that the characters use is characteristic of the Absurd Theatre plays.
Sentences without clear meaning and the ambiguity of the
whole on many times. The repetitions are present, for example when
Estragon says “Nothing to be done” in
some occasions.
To
conclude I am going to say that this play reflects the wait of people for
someone or something, but never arrives. We can interpret that they are waiting
for God, but we can not ensure it. It is very ambiguous. It is one of the
characteristics that shares the Theatre of the Absurd.
I like and I do not like this play, i.e., there are things that I like, as
sharing days with a friend waiting for something or someone that you do not
know anything of it, it is amazing. But the ambiguity that the plays of this
kind of theatre share, make me confused. It is difficult to understand plays
like this, but they have something that attract me to
read them.