·
Why does Milroy say that sound
change appears to have no “obvious function or rational motivation” (146)?
Milroy
focuses on his test that the sound change doesn’t have “obvious function or
rational motivation”, and this is supported by the comment that says that “the
use of one vowel-sound rather than other is purely arbitrary”; The speakers
don’t follow any pattern so that’s is why the sound change is arbitrary and
they choose which one to use in every moment.
·
What is/are the main
difference/s between Milroy’s approach and that of the Neogrammarians
(147-148)?
The
Neogrammarians were interested in how “sound change”
and it focuses the language as a object, but on the
other side; Milroy believes that it is necessary that sociolinguistics
approaches has to deal with speakers.
·
According to Milroy,
what is language change dependent on? (149)
According
to Milroy “linguistic change is embedded in a context of language” if the
change is admitted or not it will depends on the degree of internal cohesion of
the community. On the other side, the Neogrammarians
depend on documents.
·
Why does Milroy say that sound change actually
doesn’t exist (150)?
He
doesn’t really says that sounds changes do not exist, the only thing he says is
that one sound is substituted for another, and if it persist, it needs to be
maintained by the speakers.
·
Why does Milroy
disagree with Neogrammarians when they say that sound
change is “blind” (150)?
Because he thinks that the
changes on the language is caused by the speakers, in other words a social
process.
·
What is meant by “lexical diffusion” (151)?
A lexical diffusion is a
gradual process and a replacement pattern. It takes a form, then changes it and
the result is really different to the original one.
·
What does dialect displacement
mean? Give an example.(152)
“Dialect displacement is the displacement of one dialect by
another which is, for some reason, socially
dominant at some particular time”. One example is New Zealand English was Southern British in type and displaced by an
Australian type.
·
What are “community” or
“vernacular” norms? What term that we have used in class is similar (152)?
Norms observed by speakers and maintained by communities.
Talking about a vernacular language, it is a original lenguage, that doesn’t uses codes. It’s a norm impossed by
friends or family.
To sum up; there are
non-standard languages.
·
What does Milroy mean when he
says that h-dropping may not ever reach “completion”(153)?
Milroy explains that a change can persist
as a variable state without
ever going to “completion” in traditional sense.
·
Explain what Milroy means by
“speaker innovation” and change in the system. How are they connected (153)?
An innovation is an act of the speaker, whereas a change is manifested within the language
system.
·
Why isn’t borrowing from one
language to another and the replacement of one sound by another through speaker
innovation with a language as radically different as the Neogrammarians
posited (154-6)?
Milroy
says that it’s possible to argue that each single event of “borrowing” into a
new speech community is just an innovation as the “presumed original event in
the original speech community”.
·
What is necessary for a sound
to spread (157)?
It
is just necessary a process of borrowing that permits the sound to spread.
·
Why does believing in the
ideology of standardization lead to believing in “blind necessity”(158)?
standard
languages are not “normal” languages because they are
created by the imposition of political and military power so changes that come about
in these sound patterns do not come about through
blind necessity.
·
What does Milroy mean by
“clean” and “dirty” data (158)?
A “clean
data” is a language that has been already normalized, and on the opposite way,
a “dirty data” is a language considered irregular and chaotic.