GUILLERMO CARNERO GARRIDO

 

2nd PAPER.

 

ENGLISH POETRY IN THE VICTORIAN ERA AND THE ROMANTICISM. JOHN KEATS, OSCAR WILDE AND LORD BYRON.

 

AUTO-EVALUATION:

I am very proud of this paper because I actually worked very hard in doing it. I’m not referring so much to the mark that I will get, but to the fact that I have devoted a lot of time to get to this final cut, so to speak. If there’s any more information that I did not get, it is because I ignore too many things as to avoid them.

 

ABSTRACT:

This essay attempts to bring together three of the greatest authors of the Victorian English literature, Lord Byron, John Keats and Oscar Wilde. We will prove that Wilde was extraordinarily influenced by Byron’s way of living. Wilde constructs his personality and his image out of Byron’s. They both have in common some biographical aspects, vital experiences, a nostalgic longing for childhood. Wilde really admired the Byronic hero. They both share the same attitude towards the social and political establishment, which they ironically criticize. Both Wilde and Byron have a passion for the classical world. They will end up their lives going into exile.

Keat’s background and life was completely different from Wilde’s, but the former influenced Wilde regarding classical world and Italy, the Mediterranean and his interest in Shakespeare’s works.

What Wilde really admires about Keats is his ability to assimilate impressions so perfectly expressed.

(A. SANDERS The Short Oxford History of English Literature, Oxford Press, N. Y. 1994, p. 385).

We will see how Keats is actually mentioned several times in Wilde’s poems.

Something that strucks me as being obvious, is the fact that with Romanticism the poet, understood as a whole in society, becomes important, and enters a dimension that had never been studied before.

He is not someone “normal” in the traditional sense of the term, and he has some unique, inalienable and original features that make him an extravagant and curious being. Lord Byron was pretty much this way: he was a rebel, original and theatrical; it was the dandy model for the artists that would follow.

Romantic poetry tends towards egotism and subjectivity as never before.

Art will develop until the end of Modernism with this individualism basis coming from the artist himself who considers art as a projection of himself, and also a projection that’s justifiable by him. It’s the famous theory of Art for Art’s sake.

 

 

In the words of Mr. M. H. Abrams, in fact the subjective nature of the artist-poet's experience almost guarantees several things. First, the resulting text or picture will appear to the audience as new, novel, and possibly strange or even weird. Second, the creator will always be ahead of the audience.

As Wordsworth put it, truly great art and literature advance so beyond the audience's expectations that it must create the taste by which it is to be enjoyed. And fourth, manifestos and prefaces, critics and interpretative criticism, become centrally important, as does the notion of an avant garde, since someone has to explain and defend art and artist to audience.  http://www.victorianweb.org/vn/abrams1.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDEX

 

I. JOHN KEATS AND LORD BYRON’S CONTEXT

 

II. BYRON AND KEATS POETRY

1. BYRON

2. KEATS

 

III. WILDE AND HIS CONTEXT: VICTORIAN ERA

 

IV. WILDE’S LIFE AND WORKS

1.     OSCAR WILDE’S BIOGRAPHY

2.     WILDE’S WORKS

 

V. DECADENCE AND ROMANTCISM: ART FOR ART’S SAKE

1. THÉOPHILE GAULTIER

2. RUSKIN AND MORRIS

A) RUSKIN

B) MORRIS

 

VI. THE CONCEPT OF SATANISM

 

VII. HELLENISM: ROMANTICS AND VICTORIANS

 

VIII. COMPARAISON BETWEEN TWO BIOGRAPHIES:     WILDE’S AND BYRON’S.

 

IX. POEMS BY KEATS AND WILDE

A)   KEATS

B)   WILDE

 

X. WILDE’S POETRY AND KEATS

 

XI. COMPARAISON BETWEEN THE POEMS

 

XII. BYRON AND WILDE

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

 

 

 

 

 

I. KEATS AND LORD BYRON’S HISTORICAL CONTEXT.

 

Emerging in Germany with the poetry of Goethe and the influence of theoretical thinkers such as Schlegel, the new lyrics that toured Europe in the late XVIII century was characterized by its confidence in the imagination as a bridge to the transcendental knowledge. The new prominence that reached the individual gave way to the lyrical exploitation of the fight inside and the human experience, while finding correspondences in the nature and meaning to the poet conceived as a subject of knowledge, able to get rid of rational constraints and reborn in a powerful innocence. The rediscovery of the Middle Ages brought with it a new curiosity about the power of love (novel of chivalry, courteous love), while the search for a medieval epic and lyric popular and distinctly national, coupled with the exaltation of the concept of nation brought sometimes growing utopism political and patriotism. In England, Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth announced the Lyrical Ballads in their lyrics, and it was Wordsworth who defined poetry as “Spontaneous flow of powerful feelings". Previously, the poet William Blake explored in his Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience in the form of the ballad, the song narrative Coleridge used for the famous “Ballad of the ancient mariner” and Wordsworth adapted everyday language and conversational in his poems. Along with them, John Keats, Lord Byron’s melancholy and picaresque and the allegorical and political Shelley were at the forefront of English Romanticism.
At a time when the concept of nation was defined and identification of national roots charged emotional resonances, the exploration of the origins in literary and cultural medieval context assumed a great importance.

 

Romanticism is an artistic, literary, and intellectual movement that originated around the middle of the XVIIIth century in Western Europe, during the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution. It was partly a revolt against aristocratic, social, and political norms of the Enlightenment period and a reaction against the scientific rationalization of nature in art and literature. It stressed strong emotion as a source of aesthetic experience, placing new emphasis on such emotions as trepidation, horror, and the awe experienced in confronting the sublimity of untamed nature. It elevated folk art, nature and custom, as well as arguing for an epistemology based on nature, which included human activity conditioned by nature in the form of language, custom and usage.

The ideologies and events of the French Revolution and Industrial Revolution are thought to have influenced the movement. Romanticism elevated the achievements of what it perceived as misunderstood heroic individuals and artists that altered society. It also legitimized the individual imagination as a critical authority which permitted freedom from classical notions of form in art.

Typical manifestations of the spiritual essence of Romanticism have been variously conceived to be a passion for moonlight, red waistcoasts like Théophile Gautier’s, for Gothic churches, talking exclusively about oneself, heroship, for losing oneself in an ecstatic contemplation of nature.

 

The general theme of Joseph Warton’s poem The lover of Nature  is one which had been a commonplace for several centuries: the superiority of Nature to art. The Natural in contrast with the artificial meant that which is not man-made; and within man’s life, it was supposed to consist in those expressions of human nature which are most spontaneous, unpremeditated, untouched by inflexion or design and free from the bondage of social convention.

Consequently, the idea of preferring nature to custom and art usually carried with it the suggestion of a program of simplification, it implied primitivism.

The idea of the sublime is a very important one in the Romantics. Is has been described as “the strongest emotion which the mind is capable of feeling” the sublime is related to the concepts of vasteness, inifinity, astonishment, when for instance we are contemplating nature and its elements of natural and supernatural.

https://correo.uv.es/cgi-bin/postman/filebrowser/dump/noop/val/guicarga/postal.uv.es@JhaIvAZlxCcVAGBD9khRn9Dh/0/2/500/0/::web/firstpaper.html

 

 

II. BYRON AND KEAT’S POETRY

 

1. LORD BYRON.

 

Byron is the writer who expressed the spirit of the Romantic Era. He was the outsider, vexed and amused by the anomalies of his own time and culture. His poetry is informed not by nature or by the contemplation of nature, but by public life and by recent history, by British politics and by the feverish European nationalisms stirred by the French Revolution. It moves easily from different modes of telling and feeling, from the self explorative to the polemic, from the melancholic to the comic, from the mock-heroic to the passionately amorous, from the song to the epic. Byron the libertarian and Byron the libertine assumed the public role of a commentator on his times because he relished his fame and enjoyed the Romantic pose of being at odds with established society.

His role playing both in his convulsed private life and in his poetry had a profound impact on his fellow-artists throughout Europe. Byron’s international celebrity help render his life a work of art which interrelated and interfused with his poetry and plays.

Childe Harold and Don Juan are Byron’s most famous poems.

Byron departed from England in 1809 for an extended visit to the view of the western Mediterranean, scarred by war and the sad relic of Greece decaying under the Ottoman misrule, and we can see this in Childe Harold, Byron’s poem written in 1816-1818. The memories of feuds and passions in the poem were as much historic and public as they were present and

private. (H. Abrams, The Short Oxford English History of English Literature, Oxford Press N. Y. 1994)

 

His style is at times, satirical, pathetic, descriptive or sentimental. Byron aspired to experiment with a verse form which would allow a variety of both expression and mood.

Don Juan introduces a new kind of central character who is at once more passive and more vivacious. His narrator is a dominant one, is relaxed and speculative, digressive and discursive, cynical and droll. The scheme of Don Juan allows for colloquy and polyphony.

Elliot in his article about Byron, published in 1937, says that the last four cantos are the most substantial of the poem.  “My point is that Byron’s satire upon society in the latter part of Don Juan is something for which I can find no parallel in English literature. He was right in making the hero of his house-party a Spaniard, for what Byron understands and dislikes about English society is very much what an intelligent foreigner in the same position would understand and dislike. […] The dedicatory to Southey seems to me one of the most exhilarating pieces of abuse in the language:

Bob Southney! You’re a poet- a Laureate Poet

And representative of all the race

Although ‘tis true that you turn’d out a Tory at

Last, yours has lately been a common case

And now, my Epic Renegade, what are ye at? “.

(H. Abrams)

The qualities of narrative verse which are found in Don Juan are not less remarkable in the early tales (The Bride of Abydos, The Corsair, Lara…)

Byron combined exoticism with actuality and developed most effectively the use of suspense. He has the cardinal virtue of being never dull (T. S. Elliot)

(H. Abrams, The Short Oxford English History of English Literature, Oxford Press ,N. Y. 1994, pages 196-209)

 

 

2. KEATS

 

Keat’s background and education denied him both the social advantages and the ready recourse to classical models shared by those contemporaries to whose work he most readily turned. Throughout his working life, Keats had recourse to Lemprière’s Classical Dictionary and not to a classical memory fostered at school or University. HE was very well read of Shakespeare, and it is to him that he habitually refers in his creation

It is very important to remark Keats’ definition on style as a “Negative Capability”, a concept which meant to him “being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason”. As well as his attempt in distinguishing between the wordsworthian “egoistical sublime” and the “poetical Character” that lives “in gusto”.

His most mature work is collected in 1817. His most famous works are Poems (1817) and Edymion: A Poetic Romance, (1818). Keats’ Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St Agnes and other poems was published in 1820, when his mortal sickness had fully declared itself. Apart from the three substancial poems named in the title, the other poems include the five odes which have since become his best-known works and the fragmentary Hyperion, which was abandoned in 1819.

In some ways his development as a poet confirms his self-analysis, moving as he does from an impulsive attraction to a dedicated absorption and adaptation of stimuli through a process of intellectualization and poetic articulation. Finding metaphors in the natural world, in his responses to architecture, painting and sculpture in his magic reading.

The odes to a Nightingale and on Melancholy: the former takes as its subject the local presence of a nightingale and the contrast of the full-throated wase of its singing with the aching numbness of the human observer, the rapt and meditative poet. The ode progresses through a series of delicate evocations of opposed moods and ways of seeing some elated, some repressed, but each serving to return the narrator to his sole-self and to his awareness of the temporary nature of the release from the unrelieved contemplation of temporal suffering which the bird’s song has offered. The Ode on Melancholy opens with a rejection of traditional and gloomy aids to reflexion and moves to an exploration of the interrelationship to the sensations of joy and sorrow.

Ode on a Grecian urn: the narrator in the poem observes two scenes which decorate an Attic vase; one showing bucolic lovers, the other a pagan sacrifice; both of them are frozen and silent, taken out of time and rendered eternal in its beauty because of art.

(H. Abrams, The Short Oxford English History of English Literature, N. Y. 1994, pages 376-385)

 

 

III. WILDE AND HIS CONTEXT: THE VICTORIAN ERA

 

The Victorian Age was one of conflicting explanations and theories, of scientific and economic confidence, of social and spiritual pessimism, of a sharpened awareness of the inevitability of progress and of deep disquiet as to the nature of the present. Like all ages it was an age of paradox.

Religion remained a powerful source in Victorian life and literature. It was a time of growing doubts as to the very doctrinal and historical bases of Christianity, which were fostered and emboldened by the appearance in 1859 of Darwin’s On the Origin of species by means of natural selection by the steady development of Darwinian theories by his disciples and by intellectual culture very much influenced by scientific materialism.

Mid-Victorian society was still held together by the cement of Christian moral teaching and constructed by the triumph of puritan sexual mores. It laid a particular stress on the virtues of monogamy and family life, but it was also publicly aware of flagrant anomalies throughout the social system. Many individual Victorians saw the family as an agent of oppression and as the main vehicle of encompassing conformity.

The Victorian age has its revivals, its battles, of style, its continuities in painting and architecture, as well as in literature. It was an age of experimental engineering. As the great exhibition of 1851 proudly demonstrated, this was the age both of applied art and of the application of new technologies to all aspects of design and production

New urban prosperity and industrial enterprise gave the middle and working classes a variety of small domestic comforts and ornaments which were once confined only to the very rich. The years 1830-1880 were years of British self-confidence and semi-isolation in terms of European affairs, but the illusion of peace was broken by the Crimean War (1853–1856).

The domestic political scene saw the sacredness of the principles of liberty, of conscience and the freedom of the individual enshrined in law, but these principles most benefited middle-class men, and were of little relevance to many women who were still denied proper education and proper rights and to all the women who were excluded from the franchise. There were those among the poor whose only right was the right to starve. In society as a whole they were challenged by the pressures exerted by a moral majority and by the debilitating freedom of poverty, homelessness and hunger.

If upper and middle-class Britain congratulated itself on avoiding the revolutionary upheavals that shook Europe in the late 1840s it should not be presumed that social and political stability was easily achieved, maintained or won. The Victorian Era was ushered in a series of moderate political reforms that were specifically designed to avert the trade of more radical change.

(A. SANDERS, The short History of English Literature, Oxford Press NY, 1994, pages 398-401)

 

For much of this century the term Victorian, which literally describes things and events in the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901), conveyed connotations of "prudish," "repressed," and "old fashioned." Although such associations have some basis in fact, they do not adequately indicate the nature of this complex, paradoxical age that was a second English Renaissance. Like Elizabethan England, Victorian England saw great expansion of wealth, power, and culture. http://www.victorianweb.org/vn/victor4.html)

 

By the closing years of the XIXth century Mid-Victorian confidence had begun to sound oppressively, even comically outmoded. Oscar Wilde knocked at the very idea in the title of his “Trivial Comedy For Serious People”. Although Queen Victoria, that embodiment of matronly uprightness, reigned until 1901, and although the last years of her reign appeared to patriotic observers to mark the apogee of national and imperial glory, Victorian values, beliefs and standards of personal and social behavior were already being challenged, sometimes angrily by a new generation of intellectuals and writers. 

(, A. SANDERS The Short Oxford English History of English Literature, Oxford Press N. Y. 1994, page 457)

 

 

IV. WILDE’S LIFE AND WORKS

1) OSCAR WILDE. BIOGRAPHY

 

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde (October 16, 1854November 30, 1900) was an Irish playwright, novelist, poet, and author of short stories. Known for his barbed wit, he was one of the most successful playwrights of late Victorian London, and one of the greatest celebrities of his day. As the result of a famous trial, he suffered a dramatic downfall and was imprisoned for two years of hard labour after being convicted of the offence of "gross indecency."

Oscar Wilde was the second son born into an Anglo-Irish family, at 21 Westland Row, Dublin, to Sir William Wilde and his wife Jane Francesca Elgee (her pseudonym being Speranza). Jane was a successful writer, being a poet for the revolutionary Young Irelanders in 1848 and a life-long Irish nationalist. Sir William was Ireland's leading Oto-Ophthalmologic (ear and eye) surgeon.

Wilde's sister, Isola, was born in 1856. Oscar was educated at home up to the age of nine.

Wilde studied classics at Trinity College, Dublin, from 1871 to 1874. He was an outstanding student. He was granted a scholarship to Magdalen College, Oxford, where he continued his studies from 1874 to 1878 and where he became a part of the Aesthetic movement, one of its tenets being to make an art of life.

In November 1878, he graduated with a double first in classical moderations and literae humaniores, or 'greats'.

After graduating from Magdalen, Wilde returned to Dublin, where he met and fell in love with Florence Balcombe. She in turn became engaged to Bram Stoker. Upon hearing the news of her engagement, Wilde wrote to her stating his intention to leave Ireland permanently. He left in 1878 and was to return to his native country only twice, for brief visits. The next six years were spent in London, Paris and the United States, where he traveled to deliver lectures.

In London, he met Constance Lloyd, daughter of wealthy Queen's Counsel Horace Lloyd. She was visiting Dublin in 1884, when Oscar was in the city to give lectures at the Gaiety Theatre. He proposed to her and they married on May 29, 1884 in Paddington, London. Constance's allowance of £250 allowed the Wildes to live in relative luxury. The couple had two sons, Cyril (1885) and Vyvyan (1886).

Publications such as the Springfield Republican commented on Wilde's behaviour during his visit to Boston in order to give lectures on aestheticism, suggesting that Wilde's conduct was more of a bid for notoriety rather than a devotion to beauty and the aesthetic.

Wilde's mode of dress also came under attack by critics such as Higginson, who wrote in his paper Unmanly Manhood, of his general concern that Wilde's effeminacy would influence the behaviour of men and women, arguing that his poetry "eclipses masculine ideals [..that..] under such influence men would become effeminate dandies". He also scrutinised the links between Oscar Wilde's writing, personal image and homosexuality, calling his work and lifestyle 'Immoral'.

 

Wilde was deeply impressed by the English writers John Ruskin and Walter Pater, who argued for the central importance of art in life. He later commented ironically on this view when he wrote, in The Picture of Dorian Gray, "All art is quite useless", a statement meant to be read literally, as it was in keeping with the doctrine of Art for art's sake, coined by the philosopher Victor Cousin, promoted by Theophile Gautier and brought into prominence by James McNeill Whistler. In 1879 Wilde started to teach Aesthetic values in London.

 

Though Wilde's sexual orientation has variously been considered bisexual, homosexual, and paederastic, Wilde himself felt he belonged to a culture of male love inspired by the Greek paederastic tradition. In describing his own sexual identity, Wilde used the term Socratic. He may have had significant sexual relationships with Frank Miles, Constance Lloyd (Wilde's wife), Robert Baldwin Ross, and Lord Alfred Douglas ("Bosie"). Wilde also had numerous sexual encounters with working-class male youths, who were often rent boys.

In the early summer of 1891 he was introduced by the poet Lionel Johnson to the twenty-two-year-old Lord Alfred Douglas, an undergraduate at Oxford at the time.

For a few years they lived together more or less openly in a number of locations. Wilde and some within his upper-class social group also began to speak about homosexual law reform, and their commitment to "The Cause" was formalised by the founding of a highly secretive organisation called the Order of Chaeronea, of which Wilde was a member. Wilde also periodically contributed to the Uranian literary journal The Chameleon.

Lord Alfred’s father, Queensberry, confronted Wilde and Lord Alfred on several occasions. A trial opened on April 3 amongst scenes of near hysteria both in the press and the public galleries. After a shaky start, Wilde regained some ground when defending his art from attacks of perversion. The Picture of Dorian Gray came under fierce moral criticism, but Wilde fended it off with his usual charm and confidence on artistic matters.

Events moved quickly and his prosecution opened on April 26, 1895. Under cross examination Wilde presented an eloquent defence of same-sex love:

Charles Gill (pros.): What is "the love that dares not speak its name?"

Wilde: "The love that dares not speak its name" in this century is such a great affection of an elder for a younger man as there was between David and Jonathan, such as Plato made the very basis of his philosophy, and such as you find in the sonnets of Michelangelo and Shakespeare. It is that deep spiritual affection that is as pure as it is perfect. It dictates and pervades great works of art, like those of Shakespeare and Michelangelo, and those two letters of mine, such as they are. It is in this century misunderstood, so much misunderstood that it may be described as "the love that dares not speak its name," and on that account of it I am placed where I am now. It is beautiful, it is fine, it is the noblest form of affection. There is nothing unnatural about it. It is intellectual, and it repeatedly exists between an older and a younger man, when the older man has intellect, and the younger man has all the joy, hope and glamour of life before him. That it should be so, the world does not understand. The world mocks at it, and sometimes puts one in the pillory for it."

 

On May 25, 1895 Wilde was convicted of gross indecency and sentenced to two years' hard labour. His conviction angered some observers, one of whom demanded, in a published letter, "Why does not the Crown prosecute every boy at a public or private school or half the men in the universities?" in reference to the presumed pederastic proclivities of British upper class men.

Wilde was imprisoned first in Pentonville and then in Wandsworth prison in London, and finally transferred in November to Reading Prison

Prison was unkind to Wilde's health and after he was released on May 19, 1897 he spent his last three years penniless, in self-imposed exile from society and artistic circles.

 Wilde went under the assumed name of Sebastian Melmoth, after the famously "penetrated" Saint Sebastian and the devilish central character of Wilde's great-uncle Charles Robert Maturin's gothic novel Melmoth the Wanderer.

Nevertheless, Wilde lost no time in returning to his previous pleasures. According to Douglas, Ross "dragged [him] back to homosexual practices" during the summer of 1897, which they spent together in Berneval. After his release, he also wrote the famous poem The Ballad of Reading Gaol. Wilde spent his last years in the Hôtel d'Alsace, in Paris, where it is said he was notorious and uninhibited about enjoying the pleasures he had been denied in Britain. Again, according to Douglas, "he was hand in glove with all the little boys on the Boulevard. He never attempted to conceal it.

 Wilde was buried in the Cimetière de Bagneux outside Paris but was later moved to Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_wilde

 

Wilde, for much of his life advocated socialism. He also had a strong libertarian streak, as shown in his poem “Sonnet to Liberty”. He was considered as being a socialist because he stood against Victorian moral.

Wilde lived his life twice: first, in show motion, then faster. During his first “vital period”, so to speak, he was a scoundrel, in his second he would become a victim.

His last three years of his live, after he got out of prison, he saw that people actually despised him, the same people who had helped him before, hated him; his wife left him, he didn’t know where his children were; he had terrible encounters with old adversaries. It was a strange feeling Wilde had: there were those who couldn’t stand him because of his being homosexual, some others couldn’t stand his constant asking for money. Although he still found some youngsters with whom to talk, these activities were carried out in a desolate environment, with the memories of what he had been, and what he was at that time, all the debts which in the first years of his brilliant career were just insignificant problems, were actually real ones. The English law had creased Oscar  Wilde over with a severe punishment, and the English society had given him the coup de grâce by ostracizing him.

Oscar Wilde actually belongs more to our world than the Victorian’s. Wilde is the tireless defender of a new aesthetic, dangerously confronted with a society that was not mature enough to greet him. He carried out a rigorous dissection of the Victorian English society, as well as a radical reconsideration of its values. Oscar Wilde knew about all its secrets and he brought to light all its fictions. The same way Nietzsche and Blake did, Wilde thought that Good and Evil are not what they seem, that moral branding is incapable of covering the complexity of human conduct.

 (Richard Ellman, Oscar Wilde, Edhasa, Barcelona, 1990 p. 663-664,) Free Translation by Guillermo Carnero Garrido.

. He carried out a rigorous dissection of the Victorian English society, as well as a radical reconsideration of its values. Oscar Wilde knew about all its secrets and he brought to light all its fictions. The same way Nietzsche and Blake did, Wilde thought that Good and Evil are not what they seem, that moral branding is incapable of covering the complexity of human conduct. (Free Translation by Guillermo Carnero Garrido.)

 (ELLMANN, Richard Oscar Wilde, Edhasa, Barcelona, 1990, p.14)

 

The English law had creased Oscar Wilde over with a severe punishment, and the English society had given him the coup de grâce by ostracizing him. The puritan elements in the English middle-class showed great disgust in everything that had to do with Oscar Wilde’s way of living, his writings, way of thinking and his activities. The English find repellent everything that relates to sexual excess. In the Anglo-saxon countries the artist and sexual passion are prohibited.(Free translation by Guillermo Carnero Garrido)  (HARRIS, Frank, Vida y confesiones de Oscar Wilde,  Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 1999)

 

 

2) WILDE’S WORKS

 

From the beginning, when Wilde left Dublin to study at Oxford, he seems to have aspired to shine in England and to be the central figure in a fashionable metropolitan coterie of artists, writers, and wits. He also acted out the parts of a London socialite and of a amusingly provocative social critic. Underlying all Wilde´s life and works (he readily acknowledge that there was an intimate relationship with the two). There were both a seriousness and acute, but amused awareness that he was acting.

The contrived style of much of his prose, the excessive elaboration of his poetry and the aphoristic and paradoxical wit of his plays are all subversive. They do more than reject mid-Victorian values in life and art in the name of aestheticism; they defiantly provoke a response to difference. He always questions institutions, moral imperatives, and social clichés Wilde’s delight in provocation and exploration of alternative moral perspectives, mark his most important work of fiction, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890) The novel’s Preface presents a series of aphorisms about art and literature, which end in the bald statement “All art is useless”.

The narrative that follows is a melodramatic demonstration of the notion that art and morality are quite divorced. Aetheticism is both damned and upheld; hedonism both disdained and indulged. Dorian Gray is self-destructive, darkly, sinning central character is at once a desperate suicide and a martyr.

Quite the most influential of his tragedies, Salomé, is a play which draws on the Bible account of the death of John  the Baptist. The striking imaginery of Salomé, and its shocking juxtapositions of repulsion and sexual desire, of death and orgasm, were particularly powerfully transformed in the German version which became the libretto of Richard Strauss’s revolutionary opera of 1915.

Wilde’s comedies of 1890s have a far surer place in the theatre. The importance of being Ernest, Lady’s Windermere’s Fan, A Woman of no importance are the plays on which Wilde shows his talented wit.  At the time of Wilde’s arrest, charged with illegal homosexual practices, both the carefully plotted An Ideal Husband (1895) and its successor The Importance of being Ernest were playing to large theatre audiences. As the scandal developed, Wilde’s name was erased from the hoards outside the theatres.

The real achievement of these plays lies neither in their temporal notoriety, nor in their polished and anti-sentimental surfaces, but in their undercurrents of boredom, disillusion, alienation and real feeling. Despite their delightful evocations of flippancy and snobbery, and despite their shifts in attitudes and judgements, Wilde triumphed in capturing a fluid, intensely funny mood of irresponsibility which challenges all pretension except that of the artifice of the plays themselves. 

Wilde’s central arguments are, however derived from an awareness that art is far more than a mere imitation of nature.

A.   SANDERS, The Short Oxford History of English Literature, Oxfrod Press N. Y. 1994, pages 475-476)

 

 

V. DECADENCE AND ROMANTICISM: THE ART FOR ART’S SAKE.

1.     TÉOPHILE GAULTIER

2.     RUSKIN AND MORRIS

A) RUSKIN

B) MORRIS

        

There is a concept that we have to become acquainted with in order to understand what this is all about, and that concept is decadence, related to Romanticism.

 

Nineteenth-century Decadent literature either describes aspects of decadent life and society or reflects the decadent literary aesthetic.  In a sociopolitical vein, the Romantics' notion of individualism and their revolt against classical form and conservative morality helped formulate decadence into a self-conscious lifestyle choice that allowed individuals not only to accept but to celebrate preferences and tastes that were traditionally seen as deviant, immoral, and counterproductive.

The strongest argument for a connection between Romanticism and a literary or aesthetic form of decadence during the first half of the nineteenth century was made by Désiré Nisard (1806-1888), in his antiromantic work Etudes de moeurs et de critique sur les poètes latins de la décadence (1834). Though focusing on late Roman poetry, the work succeeds in criticizing contemporary Romantic writing for its artificiality and deceptiveness, thus lending support to the frequent claim that the Decadent Movement represents the final phase of the Romantic era.

Even though the terms Decadence and Aestheticism have often been applied to late nineteenth-century literature interchangeably, not all Decadent literature is part of Aestheticism, just as not all Aesthetic literature can be called Decadent. Generally speaking, Aestheticism applies the concept of l'art pour l'art (art for art's sake) to art, whereas Decadence applies it to life and society.

During the heyday of the Decadent Movement, the term Decadent was used to refer to both lifestyle and literature. Comparable tactics can be found in some nineteenth-century art, such as the paintings of Gustave Moreau (1826-1898) and the drawings of Felicien Rops (1833-1898) and Aubrey Beardsley (1872-1898).

Most of the authors associated with the Decadent Movement are known for their writing rather than their lifestyles, just as a number of the Decadent authors who wrote about homosexuality or lesbianism were not overtly gay. A Decadent approach to life and society was theoretically desirable, but it was rarely actually practiced by the authors.

The general notion of decadence in the nineteenth century involved the claim that when a society reached its peak of prosperity, it would no longer have to concern itself with such things as subsistence or regeneration. Therefore, attention would shift from the communal to the individual, with individualism gaining greater import. During a period of social decay, society would be in a state of regression, but it would be marked by artistic genius.

 

THÉOPHILE GAULTIER

Théophile Gautier (1811-1872) states that the style of decadence in literature and art reflects a civilization at the ultimate point of maturity as it attempts to communicate the most elusive remnants of its being, even while it pushes itself to neurosis, depravity, and madness. The nineteenth-century Decadent Movement also reflects the sense of dehumanization and alienation that contemporary progress fostered primarily among members of western European society. Ironically, to signify humanity's position above the secular realm that produced the state of social discord that the Decadent authors were experiencing, they turned their praise to the artificial, itself often a product of the same process of mechanization. An appreciation of artifice, the argument goes, advertises humanity's freedom from, and superiority over, the secular realm. Since virtue was seen to belong to a higher realm, a logical correlation existed between the natural and evil, on the one hand, and the artificial and virtuous, on the other. The cult of the "unnatural" thus could be justified as a valorization of virtue. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9ophile_Gautier

In accord with the tenets of Aestheticism, the proponents of Decadence, disavowing any relation between art and the natural or secular, claimed that life should be viewed from an aesthetic perspective and that art need not serve any moral, political, or utilitarian purpose. Aesthetic strategies of representation that supported social values of morality, industry, perpetuity, and naturalness were challenged by an aesthetic valorization of immorality, indolence, decay, and unnaturalness. The nineteenth-century view of same-sex physical intercourse as unnatural, or "artificial," was a central reason for the affiliation of gay sex with the movement. In addition, the valuation of an ideal, artificial world over conventional lifestyles, as well as the overt disavowal of moral values, was also a major reason for the affiliation of male homosexuality and lesbianism with Decadence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decadence

Though the Decadent Movement was not clearly defined until the second half of the nineteenth century, Gautier, who was not wholly enamored of the term decadence, popularized the associated concept of l'art pour l'art and articulated some of the fundamental tenets of Decadence as early as 1836. In his defensive preface to Mademoiselle de Maupin (1835), which Mario Praz refers to as "the apologia of lesbian love" and "the Bible of Decadence," Gautier argues that only that which is useless can be truly beautiful and that morality is not a product of books.

http://www.glbtq.com/literature/decadence,3.html

 

 Sur la vertu et l’immoralité dans la littérature 

Une des choses les plus burlesques de la joyeuse époque ou nous avons le bonheur de vivre est incontestablement la réhabilitation de la vertu entreprise par tous les journaux, de quelque couleur qu’ils soient, rouges, verts ou tricolores. La vertu est assurément quelque chose de fort respectable, et nous n’avons pas envie de lui manquer, Dieu nous en préserve ! La bonne et digne femme ! (...) mais il me semble naturel de lui préférer, surtout quand on a vingt ans, quelque petite immoralité bien pimpante, bien coquette (...) Les journalistes les plus monstrueusement vertueux ne sauraient être d’un avis différent, et, s’ils disent le contraire, il est très probable qu’ils ne le pensent pas. Penser une chose, en écrire une autre, cela arrive tous les jours, surtout aux gens vertueux.

Sur les critiques littéraires 

Le critique qui n’a rien produit est un lâche. C’est comme un abbé qui courtise la femme d’un laïque : celui-ci ne peut lui rendre la pareille.

Sur l’utilité du beau 

Rien de ce qui est beau n’est indispensable à la vie. - On supprimerait les fleurs, le monde n’en souffrirait pas matériellement ; qui voudrait cependant qu’il n’y eût plus de fleurs ? Je renoncerais plutôt aux pommes de terre qu’aux roses, et je crois qu’il n’y a qu’un utilitaire au monde capable d’arracher une plate-bande de tulipes pour y planter des choux. À quoi sert la beauté des femmes ? Pourvu qu’une femme soit médicalement bien conformée, en état de faire des enfants, elle sera toujours assez bonne pour des économistes. À quoi bon la musique ? à quoi bon la peinture ? Qui aurait la folie de préférer Mozart à M. Carrel, et Michel-Ange à l’inventeur de la moutarde blanche ? Il n’y a de vraiment beau que ce qui ne peut servir à rien ; tout ce qui est utile est laid, car c’est l’expression de quelque besoin, et ceux de l’homme sont ignobles et dégoûtants, comme sa pauvre et infirme nature.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9ophile_Gautier

Mademoiselle de Maupin represents a number of decadent traits, principal among them being the transvestism and same-sex eroticism instigated through subterfugal cross-dressing, with the desire for a variety of sexual pleasures forming the principal narrative.

 

By implying that his text does not influence social morality but exists for its own useless sake, Gautier opened a space for Decadent art and for decadent social transgressions. Gautier's formulation of amoral art was admired by Walter Pater, himself a central influence on the dominant version of Decadence that formed in England.

Another major element of Decadent writing, in both France and England, is the issue of religion, particularly Catholicism. A central paradox in Decadence is the fact that pure artifice, regardless of how much it is emulated, can never be attained. Ultimately, a Decadent individual, whether real or fictional, must either see the Decadent program as a failure or proceed to a higher artifice that is defined as unattainable within the secular world--a spiritual artifice.

English Decadence, as an aesthetic approach, was less extravagant and less flaunting than its French counterpart. The term decadent was used in England as early as 1837, appearing in Thomas Carlyle's (1795-1881) History of the French Revolution.  The major precursors of the English Decadents were Gautier, Baudelaire, Rossetti, and the Romantics, particularly John Keats (1795-1821). Although Rossetti was not fond of Aestheticism or artifice, many Aesthetes and Decadents appreciated his aesthetic tastes and the strong eroticism of his work. The Decadent Movement in England ended almost overnight, with the Wilde trials in 1895.http://www.glbtq.com/literature/decadence,4.html

 

2) RUSKIN AND MORRIS

A) Ruskin

John Ruskin is known for his work as an art critic and social critic, but is remembered as an author, poet and artist. What particularly interests us is his belief that art was essentially concerned to communicate an understanding of nature and that authentic artists should reject inherited conventions. His most famous dictum was “go to nature in all singleness of heart, rejecting nothing and selecting nothing”. He later believed that the pre-raphaelites formed a new and noble school of art that would provide the basis for a thoghroughgoing reform of the art world. For Ruskin, art should communicate the truth above all things. Let’s explain Ruskin’s view: rejection of mechanisation and standarization also informed Ruskin’s theories of architecture, emphasising the importance of the Medieval Gothic Style: its reference to nature and for natural forms. For Ruskin, the Gothic style expressed the meaning of architecture as a combination of values of strength, solidarity and aspiration. For Ruskin, Gothic architecture involved the whole community in its creation and expressed the full range of human emotions.

Ruskin’s accounts on art are descriptions of a superior type that conjures images vividly in the mind’s eye. Certain principles, however, remain consistent throughout his work: 1. Art is not a matter of taste, but involves the whole man. Whether in making or perceiving a work of art, we bring to bear on it feeling, intellect, morals, knowledge, memory, and every other human capacity, all focused in a flash on a single point. Aesthetic man is a concept as false and dehumanizing as economic man.

2. That even the most superior mind and the most powerful imagination must found itself on facts, which must be recognized for what they are. The imagination will often reshape them in a way which the prosaic mind cannot understand; but this recreation will be based on facts, not on formulas or illusions.

3. That these facts must be perceived by the senses, or felt; not learnt.

4. That the greatest artists and schools of art have believed it their duty to impart vital truths, not only about the facts of vision, but about religion and the conduct of life.

5. That beauty of form is revealed in organisms which have developed perfectly according to their laws of growth, and so give, in his own words, 'the appearance of felicitous fulfillment of function.

6. That this fulfillment of function depends on all parts of an organism cohering and cooperating. This was what he called the 'Law of Help,' one of Ruskin's fundamental beliefs, extending from nature and art to society.

7. That good art is done with enjoyment. The artist must feel that, within certain reasonable limits, he is free, that he is wanted by society, and that the ideas he is asked to express are true and important.

8. That great art is the expression of epochs where people are united by a common faith and a common purpose, accept their laws, believe in their leaders, and take a serious view of human destiny. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ruskin

 

 

B) Morris

 

William Morris (March 24, 1834October 3, 1896) was an English artist, writer, and socialist. He was one of the principal founders of the British Arts and Crafts movement, a pioneer of the socialist movement in Britain, and a writer of poetry and fiction. It was at Exeter that Morris met his life-long friends and collaborators, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Edward Burne-Jones, Ford Madox Brown and Philip Webb. He also met his wife, Jane Burden, a working-class woman from Oxford whose pale skin, figure, and wavy, abundant dark hair were considered by Morris and his friends the epitome of beauty.

These friends formed an artistic movement, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. They eschewed the tawdry industrial manufacture of decorative arts and architecture and favored a return to hand-craftsmanship, raising artisans to the status of artists. He espoused the philosophy that art should be affordable, hand-made, and that there should be no hierarchy of artistic mediums.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_morris

 

VI. THE CONCEPT OF SATANISM .

For Rousseau, man is good; however society exerts too much pressure on him, and he gets corrupted and suffers a great deal. So, what Rousseau is claiming for is a modification of society, just so that it would actually rise to the individual’s occasion and their demands of happiness, something that could only be obtained through a virtuous situation. Doing good, as Rousseau put it once, is enjoying oneself. Pleasure was a moral fundament of life (that is something Diderot and other philosophers defend). In Diderot’s times the philosopher stands for someone who because of his dissolute behaviour, stands up to the obligations of the Christian life. Someone could only be happy if he rejected moral prejudices, feelings. This definition of “Man of pleasure” did lead to the greatest critique about philosophical thinking, the so called, libertine theory. Fighting for the liberation of desire lead to the defending of sexual perversions. This liberation of desire lead to amoralism from the aesthetes of evil.

 

A sadist needs something to infringe, some God he shall profane and blaspheme, and in doing so, he would get to an endless source  voluptuousness which implies the horror and the division that the former acts would produce in a believer. That’s why Lacan said that moral theory defending the liberation of desire was doomed to failure.

 

At the end of the XVIII century aesthetics changes and that implies the end of the conception of classical beauty, and the beginning of the romantic conception, with a tormented concept of beauty, in which pain was to be part of the voluptuousness. After the French Revolution, aesthetics is not governed by cannons of beauty but by the cannons of the sublime.
The term Satanism was first used in 1821 referring to Lord Byron. We do encounter this term in the Byronic heroes-bandits, pirates…-, his stories are usually about melancholy, desperation, guilt, the indefinable disease called fin de siècle, an irresistible inclination towards being evil.

The personal experiences of the so called satanic authors, has been related to wild, dissipated lives, just like Byron’s, but in their works they show some ironic disgust as to the atrocities with which they fantasize in their works.

 Free translation by Guillermo Carnero Garrido.  http://www.scb-icf.net/nodus/007Felicidad.htm

 

 

VII. HELLENISM: ROMANTICS AND VICTORIANS

Hellenism, as distinct from other Roman or Greco-Roman forms of neoclassicism emerging after the European Renaissance, is most often associated with Germany and England in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Germany, the preeminent figure in the movement was Johann Joachim Winckelmann, the art historian and aesthetic theoretician who first articulated what would come to be the orthodoxies of the Greek ideal in sculpture (though he only examined Roman copies of Greek statues, and was murdered before setting foot in Greece). For Winckelmann, the essence of Greek art was noble simplicity and sedate grandeur, often encapsulated in sculptures representing moments of intense emotion or tribulation. Other major figures include Hegel, Schlegel, Schelling and Schiller.

In England, the so-called "second generation" Romantic poets, especially John Keats, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron are considered exemplars of Hellenism. Drawing from Winckelmann (either directly or derivatively), these poets frequently turned to Greece as a model of ideal beauty, transcendent philosophy, democratic politics, and homosociality or homosexuality (for Shelley especially). Women poets, such as Mary Robinson, Felicia Hemans, Letitia Elizabeth Landon and Elizabeth Barrett Browning were also deeply involved in retelling the myths of classical Greece.

The Victorian period saw new forms of Hellenism, none more famous than the social theory of Matthew Arnold in his book, Culture and Anarchy. For Arnold, Hellenism was the opposite of Hebraism. The former term stood for "spontaneity," and for "things as they really are; the latter term stood for "strictness of conscience," and for "conduct and obedience." Human history, according to Arnold, oscillated between these two modes. Other major figures include Swinburne, Pater, Wilde, and Symonds.

In the early nineteenth century, during the Greek War of Independence, many foreign parties--including prominent Englishmen such as Lord Byron--offered zealous support for the Greek cause. This particular brand of Hellenism, pertaining to modern rather than ancient Greece, has come to be called philhellenism. Byron was perhaps the best-known philhellene; he died in Missolonghi while preparing to fight for the Greeks against the Ottoman Turks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenism_(neoclassicism)

 

 

VIII. COMPARAISON BETWEEN TWO BIOGRAPHIES: BYRON AND WILDE

 

It’s well known that some of Byron’s and Wilde’s experiences, thrust upon such tractable young souls, helped produce a narcissistic self-love in Oscar Wilde and a nostalgic longing for boyhood in Byron, who would later idealize his school boy years at Harrow School as an ideal time, rife with passionate friendships, which were the natural consequent of Greek ideals in action. As a result, both literary figures entered manhood teeming with contradictory desires, mood dysphoria and an underlying insecurity, which with some self-awareness they used to construct the foundation of their public charismatic personas, ultimately the very creation which enslaved them and led to their disgrace.
Both Byron’s and Wilde’s matriculation proved embarrassing due to culture clash between school atmosphere and personal background. J.E.C. Bodley, a one-time friend to Wilde during his Oxford days, said Wilde was “naïve, embarrassed, had a convulsive laugh, a lisp and an Irish accent.” Similarly Byron, though the sole nobleman of freshman year, “arrived at seventeen, still gauche and immature…and left at almost twenty, a poet of growing reputation.” In response to this initial awkwardness, Wilde worked to develop a polished demeanor, eradicating his Irish brogue so completely that he often spoke with a London accent purer than many of his native-born peers. He also looked to Byron as a source of inspiration for fashioning himself into a charismatic and compelling personality: “Visually the young Oscar modeled himself on Byron. A series of photographs…depicts the poet in knee breeches and black velvet jacket reclining luxuriously on a fur rug placed on an eastern carpet. Wilde too knew very well how to manipulate his image: ‘I give sittings to artists, and generally behave as I always have behaved - dreadfully.’ Wilde like Byron understood, and had reason to regret, that nothing succeeds like celebrity.” In addition to mimicking the romantic bard’s dress, he also capitalized on Byronic eccentricities and flamboyant behavior, choosing to have himself photographed in Greek costume while on a trip to Greece, perhaps a tribute to the Albanian one Byron wore in a portrait painted as a homage to his Mediterranean trip. Likewise, he wore lilac shirts and embellished his room with lilies, two behaviors vaguely reminiscent of Byron’s fondness for donning black and his reputation for keeping a bear on his college premises. Without a clear, defining personality of his own, young Oscar appears to have adopted Byron’s, merging it with his mothers to create a new persona in keeping with the times.
While Oscar’s efforts were predominantly successful - his charming, eccentric and wittily egocentric disposition earning him numerous speaking opportunities both within Britain and abroad - Byron’s were met with intermittent failure due to an authentic, turbulent nature that resisted suppression. The young lord’s “violent passion” - words he often used to describe his own emotions - were responsible for both his brilliant poetry and for the deviant and socially unacceptable behavior that occasionally erupted from below the constrained, placid surface.
Although Byron’s reputation portrayed him as an almost mythological, romantic hero, he usually failed to live up to the romantic standards he set forth in his verse, perhaps due to the traumatic experience he suffered as a child at the hands of his nurse, May Gray. Hired to help treat Byron’s lame leg when he was 9 years old, Gray in fact not only neglected him, but abused him as well: “She had treated him with cruelty.( p22) When Byron was nine years old, at his mother’s house, a free girl used to come to bed with him and play tricks with his person.” But wanton molestation was not all Byron suffered. The combination of her deceitful, nocturnal activities coupled with her strident hyper-Calvinism created a rift in Byron’s mind that he was never able to surmount: “The May Gray episode had important repercussions. Byron’s nurse was ostentatiously religious, and the coexistence of pious Bible study and lascivious behavior sharpened his awareness of hypocrisy and cant, deepening his scorn of false religious religiosity and over-zealous Calvinism in particular.<snip> The memories of female dominance, the large nurse in the small bed, affected his later attitudes to sex with women. Byron found a mature woman a complicated structure, threateningly flabby. He preferred the physique of young teenage boys, or the girls dressed as boys that became a feature of his early days in London.”
Throughout his college days, Byron’s developing “romantic suitor” persona would be macerated with rumors of infidelity, coldness and homosexuality, with alternating patterns of wooing, then scorning beautiful women, seducing his female servants, and copulating with younger if not socially inferior boys. Meanwhile, his views on religion, while superficially agnostic - betrayed a deep-rooted conviction that he was reprobate, or eternally condemned to Hell by God. Underneath his idealistic, aristocratic mask, an inveterate self-hate brewed, an overweening passion that would eventually send him head-long into despair and consequently destruction.

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40...

 

 

IX. POEMS BY KEATS AND WILDE

 

1. KEATS

 

ON SEEING THE ELGIN MARBLES FOR THE FIRST TIME

 

My spirit is too weak; mortality
Weighs heavily on me like unwilling sleep,
And each imagined pinnacle and steep
Of godlike hardship tells me I must die
Like a sick eagle looking at the sky.
Yet 'tis a gentle luxury to weep,
That I have not the cloudy winds to keep
Fresh for the opening of the morning's eye.
Such dim-conceived glories of the brain
Bring round the heart an indescribable feud;
So do these wonders a most dizzy pain,
That mingles Grecian grandeur with the rude
Wasting of old Time -with a billowy main,
A sun, a shadow of a magnitude.

http://www.netpoets.com/classic/poems/037024.htm

 

 

HAPPY IS ENGLAND

 

Happy is England! I could be content
To see no other verdure than its own;
To feel no other breezes than are blown
Through its tall woods with high romances blent:
Yet do I sometimes feel a languishment
For skies Italian, and an inward groan
To sit upon an Alp as on a throne,
And half forget what world or worldling meant.
Happy is England, sweet her artless daughters;
Enough their simple loveliness for me,
Enough their whitest arms in silence clinging:
Yet do I often warmly burn to see
Beauties of deeper glance, and hear their singing,
And float with them about the summer waters.

http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/happy-is-england-i-could-be-content/

 

 

ODE ON A GRECIAN URN

 

Thou still unravish'd bride of quietness,
Thou foster-child of silence and slow time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fring'd legend haunts about thy shape
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?

 

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave
Thy song, nor ever can those trees be bare;
Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal yet, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!

 

Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed
Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
And, happy melodist, unwearied,
For ever piping songs for ever new;
More happy love! more happy, happy love!
For ever warm and still to be enjoy'd,
For ever panting, and for ever young;
All breathing human passion far above,
That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy'd,
A burning forehead, and a parching tongue.

Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
To what green altar, O mysterious priest,
Lead'st thou that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
What little town by river or sea shore,
Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel,
Is emptied of this folk, this pious morn?
And, little town, thy streets for evermore
Will silent be; and not a soul to tell
Why thou art desolate, can e'er return.

 

O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed;
Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold Pastoral!
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say'st,
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty,--that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."

http://www.artofeurope.com/keats/kea3.htm

 

 

ODE ON MELANCHOLY

 

No, no! go not to Lethe, neither twist
Wolf's-bane, tight-rooted, for its poisonous wine;
Nor suffer thy pale forehead to be kissed
By nightshade, ruby grape of Proserpine;
Make not your rosary of yew-berries,
Nor let the beetle nor the death-moth be
Your mournful Psyche, nor the downy owl
A partner in your sorrow's mysteries;
For shade to shade will come too drowsily,
And drown the wakeful anguish of the soul.

 

But when the melancholy fit shall fall
Sudden from heaven like a weeping cloud,
That fosters the droop-headed flowers all,
And hides the green hill in an April shroud;
Then glut thy sorrow on a morning rose,
Or on the rainbow of the salt sand-wave,
Or on the wealth of globed peonies;
Or if thy mistress some rich anger shows,
Emprison her soft hand, and let her rave,
And feed deep, deep upon her peerless eyes.

 

She dwells with Beauty -- Beauty that must die;
And Joy, whose hand is ever at his lips
Bidding adieu; and aching Pleasure nigh,
Turning to poison while the bee-mouth sips;
Ay, in the very temple of delight
Veiled Melancholy has her sovran shrine,
Though seen of none save him whose strenuous
tongue
Can burst Joy's grape against his palate fine;
His soul shall taste the sadness of her might,
And be among her cloudy trophies hung.

http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/melancholy.html

 

 

ON SITTING DOWN TO READ KING LEAR ONCE AGAIN

 

O golden-tongued Romance with serene lute!
Fair plumed Syren! Queen of far away!
Leave melodizing on this wintry day,
Shut up thine olden pages, and be mute:
Adieu! for once again the fierce dispute,
Betwixt damnation and impassion'd clay
Must I burn through; once more humbly assay
The bitter-sweet of this Shakespearian fruit.
Chief Poet! and ye clouds of Albion,
Begetters of our deep eternal theme,
When through the old oak forest I am gone,
Let me not wander in a barren dream,
But when I am consumed in the fire,
Give me new Phoenix wings to fly at my desire.

 

 

ON THE GRASSHOPPER AND CRICKET

The poetry of earth is never dead:
When all the birds are faint with the hot sun,
And hide in cooling trees, a voice will run
From hedge to hedge about the new-mown mead;
That is the Grasshopper's--he takes the lead
In summer luxury,--he has never done
With his delights; for when tired out with fun
He rests at ease beneath some pleasant weed.
The poetry of earth is ceasing never:
On a lone winter evening, when the frost
Has wrought a silence, from the stove there shrills
The Cricket's song, in warmth increasing ever,
And seems to one in drowsiness half lost,
The Grasshopper's among some grassy hills.

http://www.everypoet.com/archive/poetry/John_Keats/keats_On_Sitting_Down_to_Read_King_Lear_Once_Again.htm

 

 

THE FALL OF HIPERION (FRAGMENT)

 

Fanatics have their dreams, wherewith they weave
A paradise for a sect; the savage too
From forth the loftiest fashion of his sleep
Guesses at Heaven; pity these have not
Trac'd upon vellum or wild Indian leaf
The shadows of melodious utterance.
But bare of laurel they live, dream, and die;
For Poesy alone can tell her dreams,
With the fine spell of words alone can save
Imagination from the sable charm
And dumb enchantment. Who alive can say,
'Thou art no Poet may'st not tell thy dreams?'
Since every man whose soul is not a clod
Hath visions, and would speak, if he had loved
And been well nurtured in his mother tongue.
Whether the dream now purpos'd to rehearse
Be poet's or fanatic's will be known
When this warm scribe my hand is in the grave.

http://www.john-keats.com/

 

 

B) OSCAR WILDE.

 

KEATS GRAVE

 

Rid of the world’s injustice, and his pain,

He rests at last beneath God’s veil of blue:

Taken from life when life and love were new

The youngest of the martyrs here is lain,

Fair as Sebastian, and as early slain.

No cypress shades his grave, no funeral yew,

But gentle violets weeping with the dew

Weave on his bones an ever-blossoming chain.

O proudest heart that broke for misery!

O sweetest lips since those of Mitylene!

O poet-painter of our English Land!

Thy name was writ in water—it shall stand:

And tears like mine will keep thy memory green,

As Isabella did her Basil-tree.

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8344/

 

 

IMPRESSION DE VOYAGE

 

The sea was sapphire coloured, and the sky

Burned like a heated opal through the air;

We hoisted sail; the wind was blowing fair

For the blue lands that to the eastward lie.

From the steep prow I marked with quickening eye

Zakynthos, every olive grove and creek,

Ithaca’s cliff, Lycaon’s snowy peak,

And all the flower-strewn hills of Arcady.

The flapping of the sail against the mast,

The ripple of the water on the side,

The ripple of girls’ laughter at the stern,

The only sounds:—when ‘gan the West to burn,

And a red sun upon the seas to ride,

I stood upon the soil of Greece at last!

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8298/

 

 

SONNET ON APROACHING ITALY

 

I reached the Alps:  the soul within me burned,

Italia, my Italia, at thy name:

And when from out the mountain’s heart I came

And saw the land for which my life had yearned,

I laughed as one who some great prize had earned:

And musing on the marvel of thy fame

I watched the day, till marked with wounds of flame

The turquoise sky to burnished gold was turned.

The pine-trees waved as waves a woman’s hair,

And in the orchards every twining spray

Was breaking into flakes of blossoming foam:

But when I knew that far away at Rome

In evil bonds a second Peter lay,

I wept to see the land so very fair.

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8335/

 

 

TAEDIUM VITAE

 

To stab my youth with desperate knives, to wear

This paltry age’s gaudy livery,

To let each base hand filch my treasury,

To mesh my soul within a woman’s hair,

And be mere Fortune’s lackeyed groom,—I swear

I love it not! these things are less to me

Than the thin foam that frets upon the sea,

Less than the thistledown of summer air

Which hath no seed:  better to stand aloof

Far from these slanderous fools who mock my life

Knowing me not, better the lowliest roof

Fit for the meanest hind to sojourn in,

Than to go back to that hoarse cave of strife

Where my white soul first kissed the mouth of sin.

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8339/

 
 

FLOWER OF LOVE

 

Sweet, I blame you not, for mine the fault was,

Had I not been made of common clay

I had climbed the higher heights unclimbed yet,

Seen the fuller air, the larger day.

From the wildness of my wasted passion I had

 Struck a better, clearer song,

Lit some lighter light of freer freedom, battled

With some Hydra-headed wrong.

Had my lips been smitten into music by the

Kisses that but made them bleed,

You had walked with Bice and the angels on

That verdant and enamelled mead.

I had trod the road which Dante treading saw

The suns of seven circles shine,

Ay! perchance had seen the heavens opening, as

They opened to the Florentine.

And the mighty nations would have crowned me,

Who am crownless now and without name,

And some orient dawn had found me kneeling

On the threshold of the House of Fame

 

I had sat within that marble circle where the

Oldest bard is as the young,

And the pipe is ever dropping honey, and the

Lyre's strings are ever strung.

 

Keats had lifted up his hymeneal curls from out

The poppy-seeded wine,

With ambrosial mouth had kissed my forehead,

Clasped the hand of noble love in mine.

 

And at springtime, when the apple-blossoms

Brush the burnished bosom of the dove,

Two young lovers lying in an orchard would

Have read the story of our love.

 

Would have read the legend of my passion,

Known the bitter secret of my heart,

Kissed as we have kissed, but never parted as

We two are fated now to part.

 

For the crimson flower of our life is eaten by

The canker-worm of truth,

And no hand can gather up the fallen withered

Petals of the rose of youth.

 

Yet I am not sorry that I loved you- ah! what

Else had I a boy to do,-

For the hungry teeth of time devour, and the

Silent-footed years pursue.

 

Rudderless, we drift athwart a tempest, and

When once the storm of youth is past,

Without lyre, without lute or chorus, Death a

Silent pilot comes at last.

 

And within the grave there is no pleasure, for

The blind-worm battens on the root,

And Desire shudders into ashes, and the tree of

Passion bears no fruit.

 

Ah! what else had I to do but love you, God's

Own mother was less dear to me,

And less dear the Cytheraean rising like an

Argent lily from the sea.

 

I have made my choice, have lived my poems,

And, though youth is gone in wasted days,

I have found the lover's crown of myrtle

Better than the poet's crown of bays.

http://infomotions.com/etexts/literature/english/1800-1899/wilde-flower-603.htm
 

APOLOGIA (FRAGMENT)

 

Is it thy will that I should wax and wane,
Barter my cloth of gold for hodden grey,
And at thy pleasure weave that web of pain
Whose brightest threads are each a wasted day?

Is it thy will---Love that I love so well---
That my Soul's House should be a tortured spot
Wherein, like evil paramours, must dwell
The quenchless flame, the worm that dieth not?

Nay, if it be thy will I shall endure,
And sell ambition at the common mart,
And let dull failure be my vestiture,
And sorrow dig its grave within my heart.

Perchance it may be better so---at least
I have not made my heart a heart of stone,
Nor starved my boyhood of its goodly feast,
Nor walked where Beauty is a thing unknown.http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Apologia_%28Wilde%29

 

SONNETS: WRITTEN AT THE LICEUM THEATRE: PORTIA

 

I marvel not Bassanio was so bold
To peril all he had upon the lead,
Or that proud Aragon bent low his head,
Or that Morocco's fiery heart grew cold:
For in that gorgeous dress of beaten gold
Which is more golden than the golden sun,
No woman Veronese looked upon
Was half so fair as thou whom I behold.

Yet fairer when with wisdom as your shield
The sober-suited lawyer's gown you donned
And would not let the laws of Venice yield
Antonio's heart to that accursed Jew---
O Portia! take my heart: it is thy due:
I think I will not quarrel with the Bond.

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Sonnets:_Written_at_the_Lyceum_Theatre:_Portia

 

 

X. WILDE’S POETRY AND KEATS’

 

Oscar Wilde shared John Keats’s views and feelings on the aesthetic role of poetry. Although they stand at the temporal extremes of the nineteenth century, there is no division, intra Keats and Wilde, but continuity; they have much more in common than either of them has with the intervening Victorian versifiers. M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp, examines

the four, main critical-theoretical currents prevailing in the early

XIXth century. He writes that poetry, within the “objective” school (where he places Keats), was thought to be a self-sufficient entity, independent of external factors; its aim was not to instruct or give delight but, simply, “to be”, existing in its own “perfect” sphere of reference.

Abrams selects Keats as its leading exponent because of the poet’s belief in the power of the Imagination which, free from all social and moral constraints, can grasp the ultimate Truth and reach a superior Reality. This makes him a precursor of what the later Victorians were to call “art for art’s sake”.

 

Keats himself had declared, in a famous letter to Benjamin Bailey, that “what the Imagination seizes as Beauty must be Truth for I have the same idea of all our passions as of love; they are all, in their sublime, creative of essential Beauty.” It is precisely this aspect of Keats’s poetry that appealed to Wilde

Keats was the one poet to whom Wilde constantly referred while he travelled up and down the northern half of the American continent in 1882,

lecturing on what he called “The English Renaissance”, whose spirit, he said, “in Keats it seemed to have been incarnate, and in his lovely ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’. In a letter written while he was still in the United States (in Omaha, Nebraska, dated 21 March 1882), he expressed his most sincere gratitude to Emma Speed for having given him the manuscript of Keats’s “Sonnet on Blue” (“Blue! ’Tis the life of heaven ...”). Emma Speed was the daughter of George Keats, the poet’s younger brother. Wilde had mentioned that particular sonnet in the course of a lecture held at Louisville (in Kentucky).

“It is a sonnet I have loved always”, Wilde wrote, with typical

exuberance, “and indeed who but the supreme poet and perfect artist could have got from a mere colour a motive so full of marvel.

M.H. Abrams, again in his The Mirror and the Lamp, states that

Keats’s overwrought (“tortured”) manuscripts not only reveal the fact that poetic vision often lies in revision, but also show a kind of donnée which can be of an involuntary and unexpected nature. The bard and the playwright shared a predilection for dandysm, Greek ideals and dangerous liaisons. Perhaps the greatest commonality shared between these two lies in their fundamental philosophy, the unique combination of neo-Hedonism, religion and gothic elements that pervade their lives and consequently, work. http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40...

 

 

XI. COMPARAISON BETWEEN THE POEMS

 

The scent of Keats poetry in the Romantic Era is present everywhere in Wilde’s poetic works. (Apologia Is it thy will---Love that I love so well---
That my Soul's House should be a tortured spot/ Wherein, like evil paramours, must dwell / The quenchless flame, the worm that dieth not? ; Perchance it may be better so---at least/ I have not made my heart a heart of stone, / Nor starved my boyhood of its goodly feast,/ Nor walked where Beauty is a thing unknown)
these verses could be considered a synthesis of Romanticism and Oscar Wilde’s idea of the aesthetic.       

 

Flower of love is a romantic lamentation (I had climbed the higher heights unclimbed yet) moreover, he makes some interesting references to the classic poets, and to Dante (I had trod the road which Dante treading saw…) and, of course, to his “mentor” Keats ( Keats had lifted up his hymeneal curls from out. The poet is also referring to the fact that he is actually prouder of being a lover rather than a poet, for loving is the most important thing in Romantic poetry (I have made my choice, have lived my poems, /And, though youth is gone in wasted days,/  I have found the lover's crown of myrtle/Better than the poet's crown of bays... In this poem he also talks about  death and (Rudderless, we drift athwart a tempest, and/ When once the storm of youth is past,/ Without lyre, without lute or chorus,  Death a/ Silent pilot comes at last); and the rapid passing of time when we are young (For the crimson flower of our life is eaten by/  The canker-worm of truth,/  And no hand can gather up the fallen withered/ Petals of the rose of youth).

 

The whole poem by Wilde referring to Keats Grave, obviously is showing us the great admiration that Wilde felt for Keats.

 

The so usual vital tiredness, the spleen  the tedium of life, the “malditism” do appear in Wilde’s Taedium Vitae.

 

Both Wilde and Keats have Hellenism as a present element (for instance we have got the On seeing the Elgin Marbles for the first time, by John Keats; and also in the famous Wildean poem Sonnet on approaching Italy). We do have to talk about one last poem in this section Impression de voyage, a poem that could have been written by Lord byron, because it is his style that Wilde copies. In this poem we have got the topic of Greece as a fabulous place.

 

Now we are going to talk about Keats’ poems. All the romantic sorrow is mixed with the “Grecian grandeur” from the poem On seeing the Marbles for the first time. The Fall of Hyperion is a poem about the poet and his role; it is furthermore a characteristic poem from a decadent, inspired on Romanticism, and that was the case in Keats.as we can see in the following example For Poesy alone can tell her dreams,/With the fine spell of words alone can save / Imagination from the sable charm/ And dumb enchantment. Who alive can say/ 'Thou art no Poet may'st not tell thy dreams?

We can actually get an idea of how much Wilde liked the Urn to a Grecian urn, because Wilde’s conception of art, what was beautiful, and what was true wwere the same as Keats’. As Keats  mentions in the latter poem, "Beauty is truth, truth beauty,--that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."  We have the feeling that Wilde may have also liked the poem Ode to melancholy, for it mixes the classical and the romantic;  it explains how beauty, sadness and pleasure are mixed together hoplessly  in life.

 

 

XII. BYRON AND WILDE

Byron’s Manfred is the poem primarily responsible for producing the legacy of the Byronic hero, whose characteristics are the following: having great talent; exhibiting great passion; having a distaste for society and social institutions; expressing a lack of respect for rank and privilege; thwarted in love by social constraint or death ; rebelling; suffering exile; hiding an unsavory past; arrogance, overconfidence or lack of foresight; ultimately, acting in a self-destructive manner. http://in.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gordon_Byron%2C_6th_Baron_Byron

For Byron, the epoch of sensation was the feeling produced through observation of an union with the beautiful and the sublime, both in nature, as demonstrated in his panegyric to the Mediterranean, Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage, and in human face and form. Unfortunately for Byron, giving act to every agreeable impulse resulted in tragedy, most notably incest with his half-sister and his subsequent guilt and exile, events that became constent for his Faustian, gothic poem Manfred. In Manfred, the protagonist, ridden with remorse, appeals to supernatural spirits for forgiveness and commits suicide when he realizes he cannot alter the past. For the bard beauty and sensation were forever entwined with love and death, themes that became his legacy via the Byronic hero- the bipolar dark figure of literature, plagued with passion and besieged by guilt, a figure complete with a sadistic superego and a contumatious id, both self condemning and eternally condemned.

The tyrannical forces of beauty and sensation re-emerged in the Aesthetic and Decadent movements, albeit in a different form, of which Wilde was the predominant figure. Forsaking the sense of guilt that characterized beauty and sensation to the exclusion of any moral conscience,as exemplified in his Faustian gothic novel, “The Picture of Dorian Gray”, a book that has been recognised as being the Picture of a Narcissist personality.

Although Wilde proposed that “no artist has ethical sympatihes” Dorian’s downfall clearly signifies Wilde’s awareness that a neo-hedonism devoid of morality destroys, the exact sentiment reflected in Byron’s Manfred. What Byron laid bare in a single protagonist, Wilde had concealed in allegory, transforming contradictory impulses into characters, and demonstrating that Dorian’s narcissistic pathology, his inability to sympathize and his apathy towards his own state, did not mitigate his condition nor thwart his fate. Manfred and Dorian Gray both idolize beauty and sensation at the expense of their souls, resulting in Faustian-like destruction and both works juxtapose such gothic elements as supernaturalism and terror with religious sentiments, predestined reprobation (Byron) and Catholic damnation (Wilde). If the poet’s legacy is the bipolar Byronic hero then certainly the playwright’s could be called the narcissistic Wildean protagonist. Though these two literary authors are separated by time and different disorders, they lived similar lives and produced similar legacies: mythological characters reflecting their own personalities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

HARRIS, F. Vida y confesiones de Oscar Wilde,  Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 1999

 

ELLMANN, R. Oscar Wilde, Edhasa, Barcelona, 1990, p.14)

 

SANDERS, A. The Short Oxford History of English Literature, N. Y. 1994

 

http://www.victorianweb.org/vn/abrams1.html 20-12-07

 

http://www.scb-icf.net/nodus/007Felicidad.htm 22-12-07

 

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9ophile_Gautier 26-12-07

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9ophile_Gautier 27-12-07

http://www.glbtq.com/literature/decadence,4.html 29-12-07

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decadence 29-12-07

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_wilde 30-12-07

https://correo.uv.es/cgi bin/postman/filebrowser/dump/noop/val/guicarga/postal.uv.es@JhaIvAZlxCcVAGBD9khRn9Dh/0/2/500/0/::web/firstpaper.html 31-12-07

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenism_(neoclassicism) 02-01-08

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_morris 03-01-08

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ruskin 03-01-08

 

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Sonnets:_Written_at_the_Lyceum_Theatre:_Portia) 04-01-08

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Apologia_%28Wilde%29 04-01-08

http://infomotions.com/etexts/literature/english/1800-1899/wilde-flower-603.htm 04-01-08

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8339/ 04-01-08

 

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8335/ 04-01-08

 

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8298/ 04-01-08

 

http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/8344/ 04-01-08

 

http://www.john-keats.com/ 04-01-08

 

http://www.everypoet.com/archive/poetry/John_Keats/keats_On_Sitting_Down_to_Read_King_Lear_Once_Again.htm04-01-08

 

http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/melancholy.html

04-01-08

 

http://www.artofeurope.com/keats/kea3.htm 04-01-08

 

http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/happy-is-england-i-could-be-content/ 04-01-08

 

http://www.netpoets.com/classic/poems/037024.htm 04-01-08

 

(http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40 05-01-08

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40... 09-01-08

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40... 10-01-08   

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40... 10-01-08

http://in.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gordon_Byron%2C_6th_Baron_Byron 11-01-08

http://www.victorianweb.org/vn/victor4.html) 12-01-08

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=8500&entry=40... 13-01-08

http://www.glbtq.com/literature/decadence,3.html 15-01-08