THE WOODMAN’S DAUGHTER.

 

Coventry Patmore

 

‘She went merely to think she helped;
And, whilst he hack’d and saw’d,
The rich squire’s son, a young boy then,
For whole days, as if awed,
Stood by, and gazed alternately
At Gerald, and at Maud.
He sometimes, in a sullen tone,
Would offer fruits, and she
Always received his gifts with an air
So unreserved and free,
That half-feigned distance soon became Familiarity’.

 

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/leisure_heritage/libraries_archives_museums_galleries/guildhall_art_gallery/collection/woodman.htm

 

 

 

PICTURE:

 

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/leisure_heritage/libraries_archives_museums_galleries/guildhall_art_gallery/collection/woodman.htm

 

 

As a starting point, the poem THE WOODMAN’S DAUGHTER, witten by  Coventry Patmore talks about the link created by the relationship between a “rich” boy and a poor girl. The poem is about children and the scene is all the time surrounded by innocence and pure feelings that can only be related to children.

At first sight, the image of the two children sharing some fruits leads the observer to the idea that it is a mere relationship between two youngsters. The scene shows a rich boy offering fruits as “gifts” to a lower class girl. At that time, the scene could only be represented by children, since grown people would not accept the union between members of different social class with the same innocence than those children do.This is a childish behaviour that obbeys to childish feelings. they don´t care about social differences, they don´t even have in mind that they cannot be together because of their social position. As the Victorian Web  defends in THE VICTORIAN WEB: they have a love affair which cannot end in marriage because of the difference in social rank. But they are not conscious, they are just children and obviously they ignore the social rules of the 19th Century society.

The attitude of the girl of the poem is expressed by a semantic field that has certain connotations:”helped”in verse 1, “unreserved and free” in verse 10, that make the reader remember the pure thoughts and acts of children. The fact that “in 1862 the poet’s wife died, leaving him with six young children” NEWADVENT makes the reader think that his relation with children went stronger along time, leading him to his particular vision of children, which is expressed in his poems in general, and in this one in particular. Introducing children on the scene he can criticise society of the time, because he can impute that behaviour to children rather than to adults, and express his ideas about social classes that, in other case would be out of place.

On the other hand, the picture of the scene has several elements that are valuable for the comprehension of the scene. The picture is placed in Nature, place where feelings can be free, place where emotions are not under control, place which is in constant contradiction with society and the cities. In Nature feelings flow from the inside, and get out without restraints and Millais was aware of it. The same scene but placed in society would not have the same meaning.

The picture shows in second plane a grown person, who is supposed to be girl’s father, the woodman. He is giving the back to them, to their relationship, to the scene. He is concentrated in his work. He represents society and its point of view, contrary to feelings and emotions. It is an Impresionistic picture, it gives some traces to give the impression of what he wants to express, to give the viewer an impression of the image, of the characters, of the scene. The picture catches more specific traces that distinguish the different social class of the protagonists, for example the dresses, the shoes, their positions, ... because this is the power of images, they can be more concrete than words if necessary, images are extremely powerful. When observing his painting we can deduce that:

 his later works show with startling clarity how greatly Pre-Raphaelitism must have offended popular taste: PERSEPHONE.

The poem coincides with the painting in verse 7 “in a sullen tone” that can be clearly seen in the picture. The boy looks at her with a special seriousness, appealling to his high class position. In contrast with him, she obbeys to the poetic description of innocence explained above.

But, in contrast, words are more powerful than pictures in the sense that they can evoke different moments in time, different states, and paintings are just able to capture a specific moment and place. This can be seen in the last verse where Coventry Patmore will transform a single moment in a basic element for the development of a futurible story. He uses the words “the half-feigned distance soon became Familiarity”, making reference to the long duration of their relationship in the future, as it is defended in the Victorian Web again. The poet includes the adverb Familiarity which, written in capital letters, gives the idea of the importance of feelngs for the authors, and the value of the true relations and links created by children.

As a conclussion, the comparison between two kinds of artistic representations of the same scene gives the reader/viewer a wider point of view. This way he can bear in mind all the details that  make important such a simple scene at that specific time, the Victorian Age, and place, England, where relations were not seen the same way than nowadays. They were more strict, more based on convenience. Feelings were hidden to the rest of society instead of being the motor and the real motive for a love relation. And, in this context, the scene described in the poem makes much sense.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY