Student: José Martínez Hernández e-mail: jomarhe5@alumni.uv.es
English Philology. First cicle, first course.
English
Theatre XIX & XX Centuries Group B ( evenings ).
Paper
Author:
Samuel Beckett
Title:
Waiting for Godot ( translated
by the author from " En attendant Godot ",
written originally in French language )
Subtitle: A
tragicomedy in two acts
Black Cat Publishing. Printed in
Dramatis personae.
Estragon
He is
basically a beggar, and the character feels really comfortable in his role. He
is the one that is always questioning things, why are the waiting, why they
have to wait, who on earth is Godot, will he come, do
we like him to, etc... He is a bit the counterpoint to
He is the
one that takes for granted that Godot exists ( although he is also subject to doubt ), that will appear,
and so on. Both of them are the main characters, althoug
the other two are as necessary.
Pozzo
The master with a slave. Owner of a the territory at least as long as six hours walk ( what gives even more significance to the idea of isolation
of
Lucky
Ironic name for a slave. He does what he cans as a slave in order to impress Pozzo
and thus avoiding him selling away Lucky. Probably represents many people that
do nothing to get rid of their own slavery.
The boy
A minor but also important character. Could represent innocence although in the play
is portrayed as Cain, the biblical killer of his brother Abel.
Plot
Vladimir
and Pozzo are waiting in a very plain setting ( a country road with a nearby tree ) for Godot. They talk and discuss about it, until Pozzo and Lucky enter. An interesting conversation takes
place, later they go. Later on they come back, but this time Pozzo is blind and in trouble. After a lot of tribulations
The hat and
the boots are symbols as well. The boots are down to earth, the real things,
and a source of pain, too. And the hat is where the eyes are always looking for
an answer, that never comes. "Nothing
to be done". It is a universal play that can be represented
anywhere, since its base is just the conversation ( mostly
) between the two most important characters in a setting that could be anywhere,
in the middle of nowhere, it contains merely a tree. It is an interesting play, with more content
that thought, good theatre of the absurd, although difficult for the non
expert.
The use of
the humour is absolutely different, the humour comes most of the times from the
typical nonsense that the author sees in the comedians, or rather clowns, that
he liked ( Chaplin, Harold LLoyd,
Buster Keaton, Marx Brothers...)
Personal
Opinion:
I tried my
best, but I did not get it at all. Although something seems clear to me; they
are waiting for God, and one character questions the other about faith, the
sense of right and wrong, etc..