
"Defoe's Journal of the Plague
Year "
This article
discussed why Daniel Defoe wrote his
Journal. The author of
the article states that Defoe wrote the piece for monetary gain.
The author of the article also examines the use of repetition in the Defoe
piece. He actually counts how many times Defoe uses phrases like:
as above, I mentioned before, I have spoken of it already, I say, as I
may say, that is to say, of which in its Place, of which I shall say more
hereafter, I may speak of that again, as I shall take notice of in its
proper Place.
Also talked
about in the article was what kind of plague struck London in 1665.
It was found that the 1665 plague was both pneumonic and bubonic.
The author
also touched upon the idea that Defoe had to make some of the information
up in his journal. Defoe's Journal was NOT an eye witness account
of actual events; it was a fiction piece inspired by stories he had heard
from his family and his uncle, Henry Foe. During the plague year
of 1665, Daniel Defoe was only about 5 years old.
MAIN IDEA OF THIS ARTICLE:
Defoe uses a lot of repetition when explaining/talking
about things. This could make the reading audience think he was hedging
the issue, fishing for something to say, or not telling the whole truth---which
he wasn't.
WHY THIS ARTICLE IS IMPORTANT:
Personally, I'm not really sure why this article is important. I
don't know why someone would go through a 200+ page piece looking for repetitive
phrases like, "I say." This seems foolish to me. What does
it prove? That Defoe wasn't telling the truth? That's what
his goal was, to tell a story. This piece wasn't meant to be read
as non-fiction.