Before all I would like to foretell the big injustice that this novel an his author have suffered during many years. Not only because of its cinematographic adaptacions (generally unworthy of the original) but also because of its illogical exclusition and rebound of the most of literature enciclopedies. Furthermore when this exists is hardly criticize for his supposed literary nullity and laking of style.
    Is all of this true? I don´t think so, the way I see things, the text is much more interesting that any of theirs films and much more enigmatic than many have wanted to see. From my own point of view what it makes a novel as Draculaso suggesting is precisely the multitude of interpretations that can be extrated. If when I was a child I felt a big intrigue and curiousity for what it hid with the passing of the years, my exertion has even grown bigger for the curiousity of what it hid and what he really meant to say. Therefore being this one of the parts that so much fascinates me about Dracula I decided to do an investigation of possibles interpretations, basing my theories in what has been written in the four essays I have chosen carrying out this one and that I quote in my First paper.
    Finnally, I would like to clarify that for a total possible comprehension of my work it´s necesarry knowing well the book or at least to read it once, and if this isn´t the case, I give you the option to create a link to read Dracula from this page.
 
 

                                            © Copyright Miguel Muñoz Grau.
                                                Page maintained by Miguel Muñoz Grau
                                                Created: 19/01/00 Updated: 19/01/00