"... There is no greater assumption
of infallibility in forbidding the propagation of error, than in any other
thing which is done by public authority on its own judgment and responsibility.
Judgment is given to men that they may use it. Because it may be used erroneously,
are men to be told that they ought not to use it at all? To prohibit what
they think pernicious, is not claiming exemption from error, but fulfilling
the duty incumbent on them, although fallible, of acting on their conscientious
conviction. If we were never to act on our opinions, because those opinions
may be wrong, we should leave all our interests uncared for, and all our
duties unperformed . An objection which applies to all conduct can be no
valid objection to any conduct in particular. It is the duty of governments,
and of individuals, to form the truest opinions they can; to form them
carefully, and never impose them upon others unless they are quite sure
of being right. But when they are sure (such reasoners may say), it is
not conscientiousness but cowardice to shrink from acting on their opinions,
and allow doctrines which they honestly think dangerous to the welfare
of mankind, either in this life or in another, to be scattered abroad without
restraint, because other people, in less enlightened times, have persecuted
opinions now believed to be true. Let us take care, it may be said, not
to make the same mistake: but governments and nations have made mistakes
in other things, which are not denied to be fit subjects for the exercise
of authority: they have laid on bad taxes, made unjust wars. Ought we therefore
to lay on no taxes, and, under whatever provocation, make no wars? Men,
and governments, must act to the best of their ability. There is no such
thing as absolute certainty, but there is assurance sufficient for the
purposes of human life. We may, and must, assume our opinion to be true
for the guidance of our own conduct: and it is assuming no more when we
forbid bad men to pervert society by the propagation of opinions which
we regard as false and pernicious."
·The
Argument of the Socialist as countered by Mill:
"I answer, that it is assuming
very much more. There is the greatest difference between presuming an opinion
to be true, because, with every opportunity for contesting it, it has not
been refuted, and assuming its truth for the purpose of not permitting
its refutation. Complete liberty of contradicting and disproving our opinion
is the very condition which justifies us in assuming its truth for purposes
of action; and on no other terms can a being with human faculties have
any rational assurance of being right."
Eccentricity:-
·"That
so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time."
Custom:-
·"The
despotism of custom is everywhere the standing hindrance to human advancement."
[And this is where Mill went wrong.]
Life:-
·"Human
existence is girt round with mystery; the narrow region of our experiences
is a small island in the midst of a boundless sea." (Utility of Religion,
1874.)
Free
Speech:-
·"We
can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false
opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would be an evil still." (On
Liberty, ch. 2.)
Right
to be Let Alone:-
·"The
individual is not accountable to society for his actions, insofar as these
concern the interests of no person but himself." (On Liberty, ch.
5.)
Wise
Words:-
·"He
who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that." (On
Liberty, ch. 2.)
·"The
fatal tendency of mankind to leave off thinking about a thing when it is
no longer doubtful is the cause of half their errors." (On Liberty,
ch. 2.)
_______________________________
NOTES:
_______________________________
Peter
Landry
peteblu@blupete.com
P.O. Box 1200,
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
CANADA.
B2Y 4B8
© Neus Vicens Morant, 2001.