Look Back in Anger- by John Osbourne- An Analysis
Osbournes main
theme in ‘Look back in Anger’( 1957) seems to be disillusionment at the state
of society. The press release for the play called the
twenty-six-year-old Osborne "an angry young man"; when the play
became a hit, the phrase stuck as a label for an under-thirty, post-war
generation which felt cynical and disenfranchised.
The
play takes place over a stretch of time encompassing several month, we
therefore follow the life of Jimmy Porter as it develops. As the play starts we
are given detailed stage directions,
‘Down
R. below the bed is a heavy chest of drawers, covered with books,neckties and
odds and ends, including a large, tattered toy teddy bear and soft woolly
squirrel’
This
attention to detail is important as we can see that this is a naturalistic
play, where the fourth wall is removed for the audience to be let into the
action. The play starts with tension between two characters, Cliff and Jimmy,
Jimmy:
You’re too ignorant
Cliff:
Yes, and uneducated. Now shut up, will you?...(Kicking out at him from behind
his paper)Leave her alone, I said
Jimmy:
Do that again, you Welsh ruffian, and I’ll pull your ears off. ( He bangs
Cliff’s paper out of his hands)
Jimmy
is described in the stage directions as, ‘alienating love’ and he has strong
opinions and speaks fervently,
‘Besides
he’s a patriot and an Englishman and he doesn’t like the idea that he may have
been selling out his countryman all these years, so what does he do? The only
thing he can do-seek sanctuary in his own stupidity’
We
see that even Alison, his wife is scared of him, scared to tell him she is
pregnant,
‘
He’d feel hoaxed, as if I were trying to kill him in the worst way of all. He’d
watch me growing bigger every day, and I wouldn’t dare to look at him’
Act
two is set two weeks later, and as Alison is talking to Helena, we see another
theme in the play of love slipping away, seen in the analogy of the games the
couple used to play when they were in love with toy bears and squirrels,
‘
And now, even they are dead, poor little silly animals. They were all love and
no brains.’
Another
issue highlighed in the play is the difference in class and the problems caused
by it, Jimmy was thought of as lower class with his dinner suit covered in oil
and unsuitable for Alison by her parents. This tension and feeling of
inadequacy is clear in the play. It seems that the separation in class
ultimately ended in the separation of the pair as Alison packs to leave to go
back home
The
presence of
‘
She slaps his face savagely. An expression of horror and disbelief floods his
face. But it drains away, and all that is left is pain. His hand goes up to his
head, and a muffled cry of despair escapes him.
In
Act three, it appears
‘Helena
is standing down L leaning over the ironing board, a small pile of clothes
beside her…she wears an old shirt of jimmy’s’
After
Helena and Jimmy seem to be happy together,
As
Jimmy says it seems like everyone,
‘
want(s) to escape from the pain of being alive. And, most of all, from love’
Yet
Jimmy himself seems to be fighting everyone and not saving himself,
‘The
injustice of it is almost perfect! The wrong people going hungry, the wrong
people being loved, the wrong people dying!’
Yet
the dénouement of the play is hopeful, with Alison and Jimmy together, and
comforted in their own world of the fantastical, where one can be squirrels and
bears and not worry about the world,
Jimmy:
And you’ll keep those big eyes on my fur, and help me keep my claws in order,
because I’m a bit of a soppy, scruffy sort of bear’
Alison:
Oh poor, poor bears!