SOLITUDE

 

To sit on rocks, to muse o'er flood and fell,
To slowly trace the forest's shady scene,
Where things that own not man's dominion dwell,
And mortal foot hath ne'er or rarely been;
To climb the trackless mountain all unseen,
With the wild flock that never needs a fold;
Alone o'er steeps and foaming falls to lean;
This is not solitude, 'tis but to hold
Converse with Nature's charms, and view her stores unrolled.

But midst the crowd, the hurry, the shock of men,
To hear, to see, to feel and to possess,
And roam alone, the world's tired denizen,
With none who bless us, none whom we can bless;
Minions of splendour shrinking from distress!
None that, with kindred consciousness endued,
If we were not, would seem to smile the less
Of all the flattered, followed, sought and sued;
This is to be alone; this, this is solitude!

 

 

LORD BYRON

 

POEM ANALYSIS

 

The poem which we have going to analyze is "Solitude", of Lord Byron.

 

Firstly, and speaking about its structure, we can say that it’s divided in two stanzas, with nine verses each one. I thing Byron uses the third person of the plural to emphasize that the protagonist is the human being.

 

In this poem Lord Byron shows us some basic features of the Romanticism, as the exhaustive description of the nature or the exaltation of the emotions.

 

"Solitude" is a clear critique to the contemporary society and its consequences in comparison with the nature and the past. It's so evident that the distinction between two times not just appears in the structure (two stanzas), also appears in the adaptation of the language to each time (Old English in the first stanza, Contemporary English in the second stanza).

 

Byron has an evident perception: the nature and the solitude are uncongenial. He thinks that if we’re experimenting with the options which the nature provides us, we aren't alone. The absolute identifying with the nature, which is expressed by the author in his verses, is in contrast with his view of the contemporary society.

 

In the first stanza, Byron describes us the idyllic aspects of the contact with the nature. He speaks about forests, mountains...

Through a variety of literary recourses (like metaphors, i.e.: "Converse with Nature's charms") the author emphasizes that to be alone in the nature doesn't mean to be in solitude, because the nature itself goes with us.

 

In the second stanza, the poet tries to express us that the city is the place where there is solitude. According to the poem, in spite of that there's civilization and many people around us, we're alone. For example, in the second and third verses, Byron contrasts the reality and the simple appearance. He tries to explain us that in this society nobody is concerned for another one, and this is the genuine solitude.

 

In regard to the rest of his poems, we can say that “Solitude” possesses one of the many singularities in the work of Byron: to have aversion by the society and the social institutions (http://es.wikipedia ).

 

But on the contrary that in most of his poems, in this one is no a protagonist personified in a subject as a hero or antihero, but that we were with a quite abstract protagonist: the human being.

With it, Byron equips with total importance the nature. Although the protagonist is not a human subject, the paper of the human being is displayed; in second stanza, like the one of the antihero of the present society.

 

My first conclusion after reading the poem is so clear. Solitude transmits me that its author has the need to hold on something that it broadcasts him complete certainly. Something that cannot disappoint to him. In this case, the nature.

 

After reading this poem I decided to do research into the life of the author, to understand the reason of the rejection to the society by him.

 

 At first time, I thought that the poet could have had a great deception with an important person in his past. After going deeply into the biography of the author, I thought that the deformity in his foot, the jokes because of that and the fact that his father didn't support him, affect Byron. Because of that, the poet took affection for something which would never fail him: the nature.

 

I have read some opinions about the poem. They said that this poem contribute to a reflexion by the readers about the theme.

My feeling is quite different. I think that the opinion of the people about this theme is too consistent, and a simple poem can't change that.

 

In conclusion, although this poem of Lord Byron doesn't have caused a reflexion to me, I must admit it's beauty.

The exaltation of feelings and its narration by the poet take to the poem a frantic rhythm. It's very interesting.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

 

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/lord_byron