James Milroy: Some new perspectives on
sound change: sociolinguistics and the Neogrammarians
·
Answer the following questions using the book and other sources.
1. Why does
Milroy say that sound change appears to have no “obvious function or rational
motivation” (146)?
Because
sometimes we can’t observe any progress of language and sound change is a
mysterious aspect of change in language.
2. What is/are
the main difference/s between Milroy’s approach and that of the Neogrammarians
(147-148)?
The main
differences are: they tend to be dichotomous, they are non social in character
and Neogrammarians recognize the importance of present dialects (in listening
way) although they have written sources.
3. According to Milroy, what is language change dependent on
(149)?
The change
depends on the degree of internal cohesion of the community, and change from
outside. It has to be maintained by social acceptance and social
pressure.
4. Why does
Milroy say that sound change actually doesn’t exist (150)?
Because we
must consider the possibility that sound change is not triggered at this level:
a sound change perceived by observes at the segmental level may be secondary
phenomenon (e.g.: as a change from [e:] to [i:], what
we can observe it at the micro-level)
5. Why does
Milroy disagree with Neogrammarians when they say that sound change is “blind”
(150)?
Because sociolinguistics
approaches are not very likely to give support to the idea of "blind
necessity". Dichotomies are very important to the sound change.
6. What is
meant by “lexical diffusion” (151)?
Lexical diffusion
is both a phenomenon and a theory. The phenomenon is that by which a phoneme is
modified in a subset of the lexicon, and spreads gradually to other lexical
items.
Example: /uː/ has changed to /ʊ/ in good
and hood but not in food.
7. What does
dialect displacement mean? Give an example. (152)
8. What are
“community” or “vernacular” norms? What term that we have used in class is
similar (152)?
The norms of
language are maintained and enforced by social pressures. It is customary to
think of these norms as standardizing norms. These norms manifest themselves at
different levels of generality.
9. What does
Milroy mean when he says that h-dropping may not ever reach “completion” (153)?
In a paper on
/h/ - dropping a change can persist as a variable state for seven or eight
centuries without ever going to ‘completion’ in the traditional sense.
10. Explain
what Milroy means by “speakers innovation” and change in the system. How are
they connected (153)?
11. Why isn’t
borrowing from one language to another and the replacement of one sound by
another through speaker innovation with language as radically different as the
Neogrammarians posited (154-6)?
12. What is
necessary for a sound to spread (157)?
13. Why does
believing in the ideology of standardization lead to believing in “blind
necessity” (158)?
14. What does
Milroy mean by “clean” and “dirty” data (158)?
A reason for
the inadequacy is that whereas standard languages provide the investigator with
relatively ‘clean’ data which have already been largely normalized, the
vernaculars that we actually encounter in the speech community are relatively
intractable: the data we encounter is to a greater extent ‘dirty’ data.