I am going to focus on the importance that religion had in William Blake
and Gerard Hopkins’ life and try to relate it through a poem by each of these,
let us call them, artists, the first a Romantic author and the second a
Victorian. Anyway, before starting to talk about these two poets, it would be
pertinent to know a little bit about their lives so that a better understanding
of the paper could be achieved.
William Blake:
William Blake was an English poet, painter and engraver who was born
1759 and died and died in 1827 in London, England. Before studying at the Royal
Academy of Art, William Blake studied painting and became and apprenticed,
working along with John Basire. He began working as an engraver showing since
very early his boundless imagination and a certain tendency over the mystic and
imaginary world. In fact, al his work is rather
imaginative and strange since it is full of images and symbolisms quite hard to
interpret. There is a narrow relation between his visual works and his literary
creation. He married an illiterate woman called Catherine Boucher in 1782 and
taught her to write. She also helped him with his paintings. Blake reached the
high point of his career in 1787, when he began to put into practice a new
printing system for his own poems known as “illuminated printings”. He engraved
himself various designs which bore a relation to his poems, often accompanied
with these illustrations. Even though his efforts, his poetry was not enough to
make a living and, as many artists, he began to be well recognized after his
dead.
Gerard Manley Hopkins:
He was born in 1844 in Stratford, Essex, England and died in 1889 in
Dublin, Ireland. He was a Jesuit priest and a poet who since very young had
been encouraged by his father to write poetry. He studied at Balliol College,
Oxford from 1863 to 1867, where he became Catholic and burned all the poems he
had written since then. From 1872 to 1877 studied theology at St. Bueno’s,
Wales, where he learned Welsh. “The Wreck
of Deutschland”, written in 1875, was his first masterpiece. He used
techniques that would improve later on. His structure of the verse, which he
called “sprung rhythm” because of its abruptness in contrast to the typical
verse in the poetry of the time, is very similar to the accents of speech. In
1877 Hopkins became a Jesuit and acted as a preacher and also worked as a Greek
and Latin teacher in England and Scotland until he became Greek Literature
teacher at University College Dublin. In Ireland he became writing some poems
in which he describes his spiritual tediousness. He barely published poems
during his lifetime; his poems were mainly read by his friends. He was not well
recognized until his friend Robert Bridges (1844-1930) began publishing
Hopkins’ poems in 1918.
Once we know a little bit about their lives let us analyze a poem, first
by William Blake and later on the poem by Gerard Hopkins:
THE LAMB by WILLIAM BLAKE
Little Lamb who made thee?
Dost thou know who made thee?
Gave thee life and bid thee feed
By the stream and o'er the mead;
Gave thee clothing of delight,
Softest clothing whooly bright;
Gave thee such a tender voice,
Making all the vales rejoice.
Little Lamb who made thee?
Dost thou know who made thee?
Little Lamb I'll tell thee,
Little Lamb I'll tell thee;
He is called by thy name,
For he calls himself a lamb.
He is meek and he is mild;
He became a little child.
I a child and thou a lamb,
We are called by his name.
Little Lamb God bless thee.
Little Lamb God bless thee.
(Poem
extracted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lamb)
This poem by William Blake was first published in 1789 in his poetry book “Songs of Innocence”. This book, along
with another book called “Songs of
Experience” formed a poetry collection in which Blake expressed many of his
worries such as slavery, religion, children’s exploitation, politics, and so
on. It is divided into two stanzas
composed by ten verses and 6 to 7 syllables each. The rhyme pattern used in
this poem is AAAABBCCAA /AADEFFEDAA. The poem is in 1st person
singular and is written as if the narrator was talking to a second person
present in the poem but who does not speak. As in the great majority of William
Blake’s poems the way it is written and composed makes the poem perfect to be
sung, and, in fact, it has been made into a song by Vaughan Williams and also
set to music by Sir John Tavener.
This poem begins with a child asking to a lamb “who made thee?” He
continues asking to the lamb if he knows who did give it life and who the one
who feeds it is. If we have read something about William Blake we will
immediately know that he refers, most probably, to God. In line 6 the child
refers to the lamb’s fur as “clothing of delight” and more concretely to the
lamb’s white wool as “softest clothing whooly bright”. The poem as a whole is
structured as the question in the first stanza and the answer in the second
stanza. In the first one we are introduced to a child asking simple questions
but later the poem becomes in a certain way more philosophical concerning
theories about life and creation when the child begins to answer to his own
questions. He begins to answer by saying “Little Lamb I’ll tell thee” and then
states that its creator “is called by thy name”. At this very point of the poem
is when we realize who made the lamb, it is God. There is here a direct
reference to Jesus Christ since he is very commonly known as The Lamb of God.
It is then God who made him, as well as the child. At the beginning of the poem
we do not know who is addressing to the lamb, but it is in line 17 where we
realize it is a child when we read “I a child and thou a lamb”.
In my opinion, this poem seems to be mainly about God’s love show in his
care for the lamb and the child, using the paradox that God came back as a lamb
and a child referring clearly to Jesus Christ. It also embodies, in a certain
way, every human’s curiosities about creation and the origins of human
existence since the child questions the lamb about its nature and also its
creation.
God's Grandeur
The world is charged with the grandeur of God.
It will flame out, like shining from shook foil;
It gathers to a greatness, like the ooze
of oil
Crushed. Why do men then now not reck his rod?
Generations have trod, have trod, have trod;
And all is seared with
trade; bleared, smeared with toil;
And wears man's smudge and shares man's smell: the soil
Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod.
And for all this, nature is never spent;
There lives the dearest freshness deep down things;
And though the last lights off the black West went
Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs --
Because the Holy Ghost over the bent
World broods with warm breast and with ah! bright
wings.
(Poem extracted from http://www.dundee.ac.uk/english/wics/gmh/gmh4.htm#p6)
This poem
by Gerard Manley Hopkins was written in 1877. This sonnet is made up of two
stanzas; the first one composed by eight verses and the second one by 6 with 10
syllables almost every line. The rhyme scheme used is ABBAABBA / CDCDCD. The
poem is not in a “sprung rhythm”, which he invented and from which Hopkins is
so famous, it varies somewhat from the iambic pentameter lines of the
conventional sonnet. It has a heavy alliteration and the use of the internal
rhyme makes it also, as in many of Blake’s poems, perfect to be a song.
The
poem begins with a description of the natural world in which the presence of
God is throughout. Then he describes the state of human life at that time
describing the blind repetitiveness of the industrialization and daily hard
work, the “trade” and “toil” as we can read in line 6. It seems that Hopkins
tells us that nobody cares about God nowadays due to the work in this metaphor;
“the soil Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod”.
The foot is like the human being that cannot feel God because his mind is
blurred by work, which would be the shoe. Thus, he tries to tell us that even
the landscape and nature have been damaged due to industrialization when he
says that “the soil Is bare now”. People have
prioritized their economic interests over the spiritual and have robbed the
beauty in the landscape. In the final six lines is where Gerard Hopkins asserts
that even though his contemporaries, or people throughout the world, have
caused such a disaster, nature will always heal with God’s help. In a certain
way he tells us that God’s power will always increase more than we can imagine,
or more than our destructive power. This is seen in lines 11 and 12 where
Hopkins writes that this power of God can be contemplated in the way the
morning is always waiting on the other side of dark night, or “the black West”.
The final image we get of the poem is that of a God who embraces a corrupted world,
“bent World”, with his “bright wings” so that it heals and recovers from all
the wickedness.
COMPARISON BETWEEN BLAKE ANS HOPKINS:
William
Blake and Gerard Manley Hopkins are two men who since very young have been
really close related to religion through their parents. It may seem the
contrary but there are some aspects in Blake and Hopkins’ lives that capture
our attention due to their similarities. To start with, it would be interesting
to mention that both poets’ parents supported and encouraged their artistic
abilities and ambitions. This is quite irrelevant but a little bit more
interesting is the fact that they both were interested in painting. Two of
Hopkins’ brothers became professional painters and as the Victorian Web states, “at
one time he wanted to be a painter-poet like D. G. Rossetti […]and he was strongly influenced by the aesthetic
theories of Pater and John Ruskin […]” (1).
However, Blake’s attempts at painting were more productive than Hopkins’ since
his whole work consists of many paintings and engraved drawings. In some way,
Blake achieved Hopkins’ dream of becoming a painter-poet since he indeed ended
up producing his own paintings and reliefs for poems by him like Songs of Innocence (1789) or Jerusalem (1804-1820). His passion by
painting and engraving was such that, at the end of his life, he did not stop
his task when he was working on Dante’s Inferno.
“Even as he seemed
to near death, Blake's central preoccupation was his feverish work on the
illustrations to Dante's Inferno;
he is said to have spent one of the very last shillings he possessed on a
pencil to continue sketching” (2).
But
dealing with the religious aspect, it is well known that these two poets had a
very deep religious feeling that steeped their poetry and marked their lives.
They both were Protestants and so were their parents. It is believed that
Blake’s parents belonged to the Moravian Church, “a mainline Protestant denomination […] (whose) religious heritage began in late 14th century
Bohemia, now in the Czech Republic, […] (and) places a high premium on
Christian unity, personal piety, missions and music” (3).
However, Gerard Hopkins’ conception of religion seems to have changed due to
the influence of his friend John Henry Newman who had already converted to Roman
Catholicism in 1845. What Gerard Hopkins was looking for, as The Victorian Web states, is “a religion which could speak
with true authority” (1),
that research was what influenced him and made him adopting a new religion. A
year before his conversion Hopkins entered the Society of Jesus and became a
Jesuit priest. His family did not support his choice but some other people like
Newman, of course, encouraged him and he once wrote to him "I
think it is the very thing for you ... Don't call 'the Jesuit discipline hard',
it will bring you to heaven"
(4). Due to the individualistic and self-indulgent character that poetry
had, as Hopkins thought, he ended up burning all his first poems because as a
Jesuit he could not allow himself practicing such a self-purposed art. On the
other hand, Blake had always been a Protestant but also an “anarchist”, in a
certain way, because he was against slavery and racism and wanted all the
people to be equal. In fact, he participated in many struggles against power
and also supported the French Revolution. He had a very modern and tolerant
mind since he was also in favor of sexual equality and against the forced
marriages that used to take place at that time. But religious fervor always
marked Blake’s poems and life; he even is said that from an early age used to
have some spiritual visions, which are believed that “fired
his imagination, enabling him to produce his wonderfully colourful and emotive
paintings” (5).
This may be the reason why William Blake was so interested in painting and the
reason why he thankfully did it. But he was also critic with religion, and as
we can see in Songs of Experience
(1794) he rejected what he thought were oppressive values in the Old Testament
and supported the values exposed in the New Testament. He was even sometimes
forced “to
resort to cloaking social idealism and political statements in Protestnat
mystical allegory” (2).
In some way, Gerard Hopkins also thought that some aspects of religion were not
fair since he adopted another religion and since he finally decided to start
writing poems again, even though he once believed that this practice was not
permitted in the Jesuit order. He finally arrived at the conclusion that his
poetry not necessarily had to conflict with the Jesuit moral, influenced by the
Medieval “theologian,
philosopher, and logician” (6)
Duns Scotus (1265-1308), as the wikipedia website points out.
Taking all this
into account and as we have seen in the two poems above, religion was a topic
in their poems, be it to criticize some of the most Orthodox aspects of
religion, as William Blake did, or to criticize the lack of faith and abandon
of religion for work and material purposes, as we have just seen in Hopkins’
poem God’s Grandeur.His poems were
alse full of Biblical allusions. However, it is clear that in Blake’s poem The lamb what he does is giving us his
personal vision of God, how he conceives God’s love and how he interprets the
religion. I think then that, even though these two poets were not
contemporaries and were rather different in mind and heart, they both have some
aspects which can be related to and which make me think that very deep inside
they shared some principles and ideals.
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES:
-
(1) Glenn Everett, Ph. D. "Gerard
Manley Hopkins: A Brief Biography" The
Victorian Web. 15 Jan 2008, <http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/hopkins/hopkins12.html
3 January 2008>
-
(2)"William Blake." Wikipedia,
The Free Encyclopedia. 13 Jan 2008, 04:32 UTC.
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 15 Jan 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Blake&oldid=183980079>.
-
(3) "Moravian Church." Wikipedia, The
Free Encyclopedia. 3 Jan 2008, 23:15 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 17 Jan
2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moravian_Church&oldid=181983443>.
-
(4) Beth
Randall, 1996 “Gerard Manley Hopkins”, 2 Jan 2008, http://www.mcs.drexel.edu/~gbrandal/Illum_html/Hopkins.html.
-
(5) “The
Revolutionary Mysticism of William Blake”, 7 Jan 2008 <http://www.redflag.org.uk/frontline/six/06blake.html>
-
(6)
"Duns Scotus." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 16 Jan 2008, 00:37 UTC. Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc. 17 Jan 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duns_Scotus&oldid=184614364>.
-
"Gerard Manley Hopkins." Wikipedia, The
Free Encyclopedia. 14 Jan 2008, 04:32 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 14
Jan 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gerard_Manley_Hopkins&oldid=184196995>.
-
"The Lamb." Wikipedia, The Free
Encyclopedia. 16 Nov 2007, 20:12 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 16 Jan
2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Lamb&oldid=171949539>.
-
R.J.C. Watt. “Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins” University of Dundee. 10 Jan 2008,
<http://www.dundee.ac.uk/english/wics/gmh/gmh4.htm#p6>
-
“Illuminated
Printing and Other Illustrated Books, 1789-1792” The William Blake Archive .Ed. Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick and
Joseph Wiscomi 2 Jan 2008,
<http://www.blakearchive.org/saxon/servlet/SaxonServlet?source=/blake/documents/biography.xml&style=blake/shared/styles/wba.xsl&targ_div=d3&targ_pict=1&render=text&clear-stylesheet-cache=yes>