INTRODUCTION

 

VICTORIAN POETRY (by Inma C. Sanchis Garcia- Astilleros)

 

AESTHETIC PRERAPHAELISM (By Annalisa Garofalo)

 

MODERNISM (By Ani Tadevosyan)

 

NEW ROMANTICS IN THE FORTIES (By M. Elena Mármol Rodríguez)

 

THE GROUP  (By Mari Carmen Mora Vives)

 

THE MOVEMENT (By Mari Carmen Mora Vives)

 

THE MODERNIST TRADITION (by Sara Lozano Aragó)

 

THE EXTREMIST ART POETS (by Sara Lozano Aragó)

THE BRITISH POETRY REVIVAL

The British Poetry Revival was a wide-reaching collection of groupings and subgroupings that embraces performance, sound and concrete poetry as well as the legacy of Pound, Jones, MacDiarmid, Loy and Bunting, the Objectivist poets, the Beats and the Black Mountain poets, among others. Leading poets associated with this movement include J. H. Prynne, Eric Mottram, Tom Raworth, Denise Riley and Lee Harwood.

 (cf.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_poetry#The_British_Poetry_Revival)

But we are going to focus our attention on Lee Harwood and his poem called “The Final Painting”.

 

The Final Painting

The white cloud passed over the land

there is sea always round the land

the sky is blue always above the cloud

the cloud in the blue continues to move

- nothing is limited by the canvas or frame -

the white cloud can be pictured like any

other clouds or like a fist of wool

or a white fur rose

The white cloud passes a shadow across

the landscape and so there is a passing greyness

The grey and the white both envelop

the watcher until he too is drawn into the picture

It is all a journey from a room through a door

down stairs and out into the street

The cloud could possess the house

The watchers have a mutual confidence

with the approaching string of white clouds

It is beyond spoken words what they are

silently mouthing to the sky

There was no mystery in this - only the firm

outline of people in overcoats on a hillside

and the line of clouds above them

The sky is blue The cloud white with touches

of grey - the rest - the landscape below –

 

 

 

In the first stanza I can see that he is describing a single cloud with very sweet words like “a fist of wool” or “a white fur rose”. And he gives the reader a sensation of calm, of freedom. Then, in the second stanza the landscape becomes different because the cloud envelopes with a shadow, so that whiteness disappears and the sky becomes grey. I think that someone is looking to the sky in that moment so, that person starts taking part in the poem. Then, he continues describing the painting. And he tells us that in the picture there are people wearing coats, the sky is blue but the cloud continues with pieces of grey. He ends the poem telling us that the rest is in our imagination. As a whole, I think that he starts making us feel very well, with sensations of calm, but while the poem continues, that sensation decays. Eventually, I think that he describes the landscape of the picture very well.

 

This poem is full of nature because we can find a lot of words related to the semantic field of nature such as “cloud”,  “sky”, “land” but it doesn’t transmit the lyrical intensity or passionate feelings that we find in the romantic poetry, for example in Wordsworth. It also lacks the sensation of being in the open air. The poem gives the impression as if he was in a museum describing a picture.

 

 

I have found some comments to this poem, and I have seen that I share that idea of simplicity with other authors. They said that this is as transparent as poetic language can be (a virtue usually associated with prose), and in Ashbery’s words "is self effacing not from modesty but because it is going somewhere and has no time to consider itself". In this whole poem, the subtlety with which the scene is presented in relation to the reader/observer, and the self-consciousness with which the poem is aware of its own artifice, combines a complexity of thought and perception with an unusual simplicity of language.
(cf.http://www.leafepress.com/litter/harwoodreview01.html )

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

                                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_poetry#The_British_Poetry_Revival

Home: <www.wikipedia.org>17-12-06)

http://www.leafepress.com/litter/harwoodreview01.html

Home: <www.leafepress.com>17-12-06)

 

 

 

THE MERSEY BEAT

The Mersey Beat poets were Adrian Henri, Brian Patten and Roger McGough. Their work was a self-conscious attempt at creating an English equivalent to the Beats. Many of their poems were written in protest against the established social order and, particularly, the threat of nuclear war. Although not actually a Mersey Beat poet, Adrian Mitchell is often associated with the group in critical discussion. Contemporary poet Steve Turner has also been compared with them.

But we are going to focus our atenttion in the poem “The Armada” written by Brian Patten.

(cf. http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/mol/life/displaylife.asp?id=14 )

 

THE ARMADA

hidLong, long ago
when everything I was told was believable
and the little I knew was less limited than now,
I stretched belly down on the grass beside a pond
and to the far bank launched a child's armada.
hidA broken fortress of twigs,
the paper-tissue sails of galleons,
the waterlogged branches of submarines -
all came to ruin and were on flame
in that dusk-red pond.
hidAnd you, mother, stood behind me,
impatient to be going,
old at twenty-three, alone,
thin overcoat flapping.
hidHow closely the past shadows us.
In a hospital a mile or so from that pond
I kneel beside your bed and, closing my eyes,
reach out across forty years to touch once more
that pond's cool surface,
and it is your cool skin I'm touching;
for as on a pond a child's paper boat
was blown out of reach
by the smallest gust of wind,
so too have you been blown out of reach
by the smallest whisper of death,
and a childhood memory is sharpened,
and the heart burns as that armada burnt,
long, long ago.

(cf. http://www.spikemagazine.com/pattenarmada.php ) 

 

I have chosen this poem because it has remained me of the wars that are happening for example in Palestine or Uganda where they take children to be part of the armadas, to be soldiers. And you watch them on television having guns in their hands. I think this is the worst part of wars, those innocent children dying.

In the poem, he represents the landscape very well. He tells us that he saw a child’s naval armada which is fighting against others and he can see how the submarines start getting on flames. Then, he tells us that a child was hurt so he was brought to a hospital where, eventually, the child died. I do not have words to express how I feel, this poem is very dramatic but it’s expressing the cruel reality of the world in which we are living.

It is a very emotional and pessimistic poem, but also very realistic.

We can find some words referring to nature such as “grass” or “pond”, but the poem itself hasn’t  got the intention of concentrating in nature because it deals with war.

It is said that Armada is perhaps Patten's most mature and formal book, dispensing with much of the playfulness of former work.

(cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Patten )

BIBLIOGRAPHY

http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/mol/life/displaylife.asp?id=14

Home:< www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk>17-12-06)

 http://www.spikemagazine.com/pattenarmada.php

Home: <www.spikemagazine.com>17-12-06)

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Patten

Home: <www.wikipedia.org>17-12-06)

 

CONCLUSION