En esta página voy a incluir
el
contacto que he mantenido con la autora mediante e-mails. Cabe decir
que ha
mostrado un gran interés por ayudarme, contestándome
todas las dudas y
cuestiones que le he planteado. Además me ha aportado un
artículo Me, Myself, and Penelope
Hi
My name is
Lourdes Garcia and I am currently in my second year of English
Philology at the
And, if it
doesn’t suppose any problem, I want to be in contact with you for any
problem or question that I could have.
Thanks for
everything.
-----Respuesta de Adrienne
Eisen-----
De: <adrienneeisen@earthlink.net>
Responder
a: adrienneeisen@earthlink.net
Enviado
el: lunes, 17 de mayo de 2004 4:35:27
Para:
Lourdes
García Gimeno <lourdes_lur@hotmail.com>
Asunto:
Re:
Hi! My name is
Hi
I've
answered your questions below.
Are you writing something for school? Which school do you atend?
Adrienne
-----Original Message-----
From: Lourdes García Gimeno
To: adrienneeisen@earthlink.net
Subject: Hi! My name is
Thanks for answering my email. I
have a pair of questions that, if it is possible, I would like you
answer me to
settle my queries, as soon as possible:
Firstly, I found in the
internet that your real name is Penelope Trunk, why do you write under
the
pseudonym Adrienne Eisen?
Penelope
Trunk
is the pseudonym, not Adrienne. When I started writing my business
column,
I was writing about the office where I was working, so I needed a
pseudonym. I
no longer need to be anonymous in my business writing, but people in
the
business world know the name Penelope Trunk, so I keep it. I
actually
have a bunch of names, and I wrote a column about it. I have pasted the
column
below - maybe you'll enjoy reading it.
I’m working
with your hypertext The Interview, as I have seen and compared with
your other
hypertexts; it’s quite different the structure than the others, is
there any
reason or is it only a coincidence?
I
have found
that the structure of my hypertexts is a natural off-shoot of how my
brain is
thinking. Usually, my brain thinks in the structure of the other
hypertexts.
When I came up with The Interview, though, I was just starting out a
business
career in the Fortune 500 and I was obsessed with the power of the
resume. I
was thinking that resumes are really just stories, and the person who
is the
best storyteller has the best resume. So it makes sense that I came up
with a
resume-obsessed hypertext.
What do you prefer: write novels or
hypertexts? And, what kind of process
was involved with taking these stories and placing them within the more
traditional novel form?
My
brain
thinks in non-linear ways. Hypertext writing comes naturally to me.
Putting my
writing togehter into a linear formate nearly killed me. The process
was that I
bring my novel to a writing workshop, and everyone trashes the
narrative arc of
the novel, and then I bring it home and work on it, and take it back to
the
workshop, and everyone trashes it. But each time the people would
trash it
in new, and helpful ways. So eventually, I came up with a linear
structure that
people liked. But the process of writing hypertext is much more
enjoyable to
me.
I have read in an interview that
Nicholson Baker, Kathy Acker, also Martin Amis and Mark Leyner had
influenced
you, why?
Kathy
Acker
writes about difficult topics in a candid way and she made me feel more
comfortable writing about whatever I felt. Nicholson Baker writes
endlessly
about one, single topic and keeps the reader interested with spunky and
insightful prose, which is something I aspire to do in my little
hypertext
snippets. Mark Leyner helped me to see ways of getting non-linear ideas
into
paragraphs, even though, to be honest, I can't really get through
one of
his books.
Thank
you again and I hope it
doesn’t suppose any trouble.
Me,
Myself, and Penelope
My
three brands: Divided, I
conquer.
It started when I was just out of college, and a woman in my office
came back
one Monday with a new name. I remember thinking, "What?! She took her
husband's name?! After 20 years of feminist theory, this!" Then when my
breadwinner mom divorced my dad after 25 years of marriage, she kept
his name. I
remember saying, "Mom, you are so lame. You are an independent woman.
Get
rid of his name." She told me then that she was well-known in her
industry, and her lucrative career would suffer if all of a sudden she
lost her
name recognition.
I
realized how important names are. And I changed
mine. I made one up, went to court, and told the judge that I no longer
wished
to be defined in terms of the men I associated with (in this case, my
father). The
people in family court applauded. I was proud. My family thought I was
going
through a phase.
My
new last name had the trendy flair of having a
capital letter in the middle, like GeoCities or DoubleClick or other
companies
gone bad. I thought it would be the perfect name for posting my digital
master's thesis online. I thought I was so hip and cool, so
self-assured. And
relative to now, maybe I was.
When
I got my first six-figure-salary job, I tempered
the radicalism, dropping the cap in the middle and keeping the origins
of my
name to myself. Lo and behold, my thesis won a software-industry award.
I found
out when my boss told me. He shook my hand and said he was honored to
have me
on staff. I imagined myself winning the first digital Pulitzer Prize or
at
least getting an office with a view.
Then
he called me into his office and, pointing to the
screen, said, "Did you write this?" He said he thought it was
pornography. I thought to respond, "You are an ignoramus, and Philip
Roth
won awards for writing about a boy masturbating with meat," but I
didn't. He
continued, "You will go very far in corporate
So
I changed my name on my website to A---. I sent
news of my award to my mom. I told her to read my stories online. And
she said,
"Oh, my God, did you change your name again?" When I got the eCompany
gig and the name Penelope Trunk, I thought to say, "Wait, I already
have a
pen name," but I didn't. When I sent my mom to the site, she couldn't
find
my column.
Now
I have four names, if you count my given name. When
my brother calls me at work and asks for me by the surname we once
shared, that
person doesn't exist here. When I was on a business trip and the
publisher of
my forthcoming novel called, he had to ask, "Are you A--- there, or
something else?"
In
the process of building a name for myself at work,
I have a pretty good understanding of the issues of branding. And if I
were a
consultant for the brand of me, I'd say, "What a mess." At first I
just wanted to be a good student of feminist theory. Then I became so
mired in
protecting my brand at work that I ended up with two pen names. Two pen
names
means branding twice. Like Corn Flakes and Fruit Loops. Can two brands
be
combined to create a single, more powerful brand? Maybe for
PricewaterhouseCoopers, but Corn Loops sounds stupid. For me, each
brand alone
is stronger than one combined but unfocused brand. So there will be
three
brands (the employee, the novelist, and Penelope Trunk), one brand
manager
(me), and a very small audience of people who knew me when life was
simple, gas
was cheap, and I had just one name.
-----Respuesta
de
Adrienne Eisen-----
De:
<adrienneeisen@earthlink.net>
Responder a: adrienneeisen@earthlink.net
Enviado el: lunes, 24 de mayo de 2004 23:40:23
Para: Lourdes García Gimeno <lourdes_lur@hotmail.com>
Asunto:
Re: Hi Adrienne
Hi
I'm
glad the information is helping
you with your project. I've answered the rest of your questions below.
I
definitely would like to see your web page when you finish. I can't
read
Spanish very well, but I have plenty of friends who can translate for
me.
Adrienne
-----Original Message-----
From: Lourdes García Gimeno
Sent:
To: adrienneeisen@earthlink.net
Subject: Hi Adrienne
Hi
Adrienne,
Thanks
you again for your help.
Yes, I received your answer for my e-mail (sorry for don’t answer you
quickly!!), it helps me a lot and also your article Me,
Myself, and Penelope. My
three brands: Divided, I conquer (that you sent me); I think
that
without your help I wouldn’t finish my work. And you asked me, in the
other
e-mail, where am I studying – well, I’m currently in my second year of
English
Philology at the
I
have some questions:
What is the advantage for you, related with the readers, of writing in
hypertext and distributing it in the web?
I
have read in internet that you have a peculiar way of writing your
hypertexts (using the floor or something similar). I want to know if
you use
any programme for your hypertextual works.
-->I
don't use a program for my
hypertext. I started writing hypertext before there was such a thing as
authoring software for the web, so I had to learn how to code HTML by
hand. I
got used to doing the code by hand, so I still do, since my pages
aren't very
complicated.
In
my work I have to include (more or less) all of your hypertextual
works and also (if it’s possible) your articles published in the
Internet, are
any page where appears all enumerated?
-->Everything
that I write under the
name Adrienne Eisen is at adrienneeisen.com.
And,
finally, have you published any other print novel, apart from
"Making Scenes"? And have you think translate your novels?
-->Making
Scenes is the only print
novel. It would be great if someone would publish a translation, but so
far, no
offers.
If
you want, when I finish my work, I will send you the address of
my web page (but it's in Spanish...) :-)
Thanks!!
Ir
a: [index] [firstpaper] [biografia] [obras
hipertextuales] [análisis
contextualizado] [artículos]
[links]