CONCLUSION

In my opinion this is a different way of making literature, it’s neither a best way nor a worst one than printed books, and it’s just a way that uses the new technologies in order to increase the reader’s attention, or at least it’s supposed that. Obviously, the lay-out is completely different than in a book, and it allows you to return quickly to those places you have forgotten and to make up your personal way of reading.

It has been the first time I have not written by hand on a paper, but all in the computer. In my First Paper I could not hardly read any Chesterton’s article because I must learn how to load it accurately in “Explorador fitxers”, so that my page to be edited and published.

However, in my Second Paper I have read English literature, or must I say hyper literature? Whatever it can be called, I have made a great effort on both papers and I hope it to be useful and worthy.

In any way, I liked reading this hypertext because its main theme is about feminism and the essential importance of the new women role nowadays, and besides, it has been written in an accurate way. Generically we always refer as “he” or “male” to define a human being. Masculinity is suffering from a crisis about identity, and although there are some machos yet, the strong, protective man is dead in the ‘80s and a new man is appearing since then, at least, I hope so.

Eventually, I think that the author’s purpose for writing the hyper story has been not only to entertain, but also to inform or persuade the hyper reader about her ideas relating the difficult relationship between women and men, not only in the ‘60s nor in the ‘80s, but nowadays, that in spite of being in the era of the new technologies and the whole world has changed enormously, human beings have similar troubles on showing their feelings and on finding their place in a more egalitarian world.

Literary Resources Plot Characters Answer

HOME