Bride of Frankenstein
By CLAUDE RAWSON
Published: October 7, 2001
MARY SHELLEY
By Miranda Seymour.
Mary Shelley was only 19 when
she wrote ''Frankenstein,'' the book that made her famous. Published in 1818,
the novel had spawned at least five stage versions by 1823. There are almost
two dozen film and television adaptations, from Thomas Edison's silent film
(1910) to Kenneth Branagh's star-encrusted
spectacular (1994), with Robert De Niro as the
monster. The story has been so deeply mythologized -- embedded into the public
imagination independently of the book itself -- that the name ''Frankenstein''
is often assumed to belong to the monster, and not, as is actually the case, to
the man who made him and was appalled by the result. Frankenstein's experiment
depended more on electrical impulses (then a hot scientific topic) than on cell
biology, and Mary Shelley was not very knowledgeable about the science anyway.
But the novel still speaks to our time, largely because human cloning is now
frighteningly achievable.
''Mary Shelley,'' Miranda
Seymour's affectionate and well-written biography, concisely sketches the
background of scientific inquiry that influenced Shelley's early intellectual
development. Mary Shelley was born in 1797, the daughter of Mary
Wollstonecraft, author of ''A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,'' and William
Godwin, the radical philosopher whose works include ''An Enquiry Concerning the
Nature of Political Justice'' and the novel ''The Adventures of Caleb
Williams.'' Two weeks after Mary Shelley was born, her mother died of puerperal
fever. She had evidently been infected by the hands of those attending to
complications after the birth. These circumstances may have had a bearing on
the genesis of ''Frankenstein,'' in which a humanoid creature is
''scientifically'' brought into the world without a mother. Seymour wonders,
suggestively, ''to what degree Mary felt that her own birth had robbed this
beautiful, vital woman of her life.''
In an age of poor hygiene and
inefficient contraception, the idea of ''scientific'' rather than biological
reproduction, of painless nonvisceral birth, provoked
an ambivalent fascination. Seymour keenly brings out how fraught Mary Shelley's
own life was with tragedies of childbirth and infant mortality. Not only did
her mother die as a result of childbirth, but her father's first child with his
new wife did not survive. Neither did Mary's two daughters. Her son William
died of malaria at the age of 3, and her fifth pregnancy miscarried. Only one
son, Percy, grew up. It is possible that her stepsister Claire Clairmont was pregnant by Percy Bysshe
Shelley, Mary Shelley's husband, and that the child was aborted or miscarried.
Births and deaths coexisted violently in Mary's world. Her mother had twice
attempted suicide during her unhappy affair with her lover, Gilbert Imlay.
Their child, Mary's half sister Fanny, did commit suicide, perhaps out of love
for Percy Bysshe Shelley. His first wife, Harriet,
killed herself while pregnant. Byron's friend John Polidori,
an admirer of Mary Shelley, committed suicide too (but not, as Seymour thinks,
at the age of 21.)
Mary grew up in the brilliant
company of her father's friends, the critic Hazlitt, the essayist Lamb, the
poet Coleridge and others. Coleridge, whom Mary sometimes met in later years,
recited his ''Rime of the Ancient Mariner'' one evening, with Mary ''hiding
behind a sofa when she should have been in bed.'' The poem's icebound sea, its hero stalked by ''a frightful fiend,'' were
remembered in ''Frankenstein.'' In 1812, Percy Bysshe
Shelley came into Godwin's circle. He had been expelled from Oxford for
circulating an atheist pamphlet, and had eloped with Harriet Westbrook. He had
quarreled with his landowner father, and looked to Godwin for a father
substitute with good revolutionary credentials. He offered Godwin financial
patronage, but the relationship was troubled. Shelley was more radical than his
mentor, and Godwin cared more for Shelley's money than his discipleship.
Mary and Shelley fell in love.
They eloped to France, with Jane (later Claire) Clairmont
in tow, in 1814. The discarded Harriet was pregnant by Shelley. Mary became
pregnant too, but the baby died. Shelley also encouraged his women to have
sexual relationships with others. He thought he was implementing ideas of free
love once advocated by Wollstonecraft and Godwin. (Godwin, more bourgeois than
his own principles, was scandalized.) This history haunted Mary Shelley's reputation
when she settled in England again after Shelley's death in a sailing accident
in Italy. In spite of the success of ''Frankenstein,'' she never had the
rewards of celebrity, only a bad name.
They returned to England from
Switzerland in 1814, but went back in 1816, settling near Geneva, where Byron,
by whom Claire was pregnant, had moved. Mary Shelley, whose account may not be
reliable in some details, says Byron suggested they all write a ghost story.
''Frankenstein'' was Mary's contribution. In 1818, the Shelleys
moved to Italy. In 1822, they settled, with their friends Edward and Jane
Williams, at Lerici, near Pisa, where Byron now was.
They formed a tense and inbred circle, sharply evoked by Seymour: the women
eyeing each other jealously, each serially or simultaneously in love with
Shelley or Byron or both.
By then, the Shelleys' marriage was on the rocks. Things worsened after
Mary's miscarriage. Then Percy Shelley and Williams drowned while sailing back
to Lerici from Livorno, where they had visited Leigh
Hunt, the writer and editor. Mary Shelley returned to England and wrote other
novels, including ''Valperga'' (1823) and ''The Last
Man'' (1826). She supported herself by writing stories for ladies' annuals and
jobbing for publishers.
Her mission was to edit her
husband's works and shape his reputation. In this, and much else, she was
obstructed by her father-in-law, Sir Timothy Shelley, who had disowned the poet
in his lifetime and now harassed her with restrictions in exchange for grudging
financial support for her and her son Percy. In spite of ostracism, Mary
Shelley insisted for years on disclosing frankly that she had eloped with
Shelley while he was married to another woman and was angered by the efforts of
friends to sanitize the story. Only in the 1830's, struggling to place her son
in an upper-class school, did she seek conventional social acceptance. By then,
her opinions were becoming less revolutionary, and her increasing conservatism
showed itself clearly in the revolutionary climate of 1848.
Her life as a widow was
punctuated by inconclusive flirtations, one of them with the young French
writer Prosper Mérimée, future author of the story on
which Bizet based his opera ''Carmen.'' John Howard Payne, author of the lyric
''Home, Sweet Home,'' courted her. She hoped to marry Maj. Aubrey Beauclerk, a neighbor of Sir Timothy, who twice chose other
wives. She remained friends with him, as with many others, male and female, who
disappointed or behaved unkindly toward her. She was seldom really happy, and
seems to have been a victim in almost every social relationship. She responded
by taking increasing pride in her mother's feminist achievements and by helping
other women in hardship. After her death in 1851, survivors often tried to fake
the record, either blackening or cleaning up her or her husband's reputation.
Miranda Seymour is a novelist
as well as an experienced biographer whose earlier subjects include Lady Ottoline Morrell and Robert Graves. She has vivid narrative
gifts and a perceptive understanding of the main personalities. Her account of
Mary Shelley's writings is generally competent but pedestrian, and her view of
''Frankenstein'' inflated. The novel, Seymour tells us in a fit of
much-recycled nonwisdom, ''is a great work because we
can read what we will from it.'' Is there any work in the world from which, if
we put our minds to it, we cannot read what we will? For all its interest as a
cultural icon and its tapping of sensational fantasies, ''Frankenstein'' is an
immature production, overburdened with literary baggage, by a gifted young
person living in highly literate company. The monster is an unassimilated
amalgam of bookish ogres: Caliban, Milton's Satan,
travel-book giants. The novel cannot make up its mind whether this creature is
an obscene freak or a lonely and generous savage with a cruelly unrequited
yearning for love. The book is, in parallel ways, politically confused in its
view of conquered peoples. That it laid itself open to
vulgar adaptations onstage and elsewhere should not be put at Mary Shelley's
door. But when, for example, the monster becomes a staple of political cartoons
about rebellious Irishmen, as it did in Victorian times, our ability to ''read
what we will'' from the book falls well short of conferring genius upon it.
Copyright 2008The New York Times Company
More articles: Next
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]
Academic year 2008/2009
© a.r.e.a./Dr.Vicente Forés López
© Lorena Levy Ballester
lolevyba@alumni.uv.es